Leaderboard

Hi Nuzza, You can change time formats in Windows settings. Open Settings > Time & language > Language & region > click on Regional format to expand it > Change formats. Choose a time format without AM and with or without a leading zero. If you want to use your own custom time format, open Run (Win+R) and run intl.cpl. Click Additional settings > Time tab and enter your custom format. Hope that helps!

This is because of the bug below, someone reported it, too. Softpedia has Cloudflare "anti-human protection", https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/867

No longer able to visit softpedia with the new release.

I'm on rest, no desktop PC around, could you kindly tell, what about the buggy CH implementation you wrote about? Is it solved?

On one hand, yes, on the other, kinda scary future. 126 version still had some remnants of the old GUI, which were completely removed now, but the China fork counterpart is already at version 129 for quite some time, so.... looks like the creator solved the GUI removal problem. That said, I trust in win32.

For starters, the "rep" on this web site is B*LLSH*T. You know it! I know it! You yourself are amongst the KIDS on this site that REP FARM. You know it! I know it! Everybody else on MSFN knows it! Second, the ch40m1um.qjz9zk is DODGING THE CLAIM YOU MADE !!! Everybody, and I do mean EVERYBODY is aware of the .qjz9zk. You missed one, for the record, there is also .9oo91e.qjz9zk. THAT WAS NOT YOUR CLAIM. Your claim was that these are BROADCASTED. THEY ARE NOT BROADCASTED !!! THEY CANNOT BE BROADCASTED! You can create a web site with a .com, or a .net. or a .gov, or a .edu. YOU CANNOT CREATE A .qjz9zk - THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF UNGOOGLED USING THAT "CODE". The "patches" are PUBLIC DOMAIN. Anybody can "ungoogle" a Chrome/Chromium fork. Supermium doesn't create the patches, they use what UNGOOGLED shares PUBLICLY. ps - I don't use the CAPS LOCK, I hold a SHIFT key down and type with a SHIFT key held down, NO CAPS LOCK WAS USED IN THE MAKING OF THIS POST.

It is the same syntax as the ini file uses: WinNTSetup_x64.exe NT6 -sysPart:HDD0:1 -tempDrive:Z: -sysLetter:C: -bcd:EFI -silent -setup

You'd have to put your money where your mouth is with that claim. Post the link/discussion. Otherwise, don't believe you, don't care, and won't believe future advice from you either without documentation/links to back up such claims. Let's be honest, if *I* posted such a claim, you'd have yourself and a couple Lemmings jumping all over me. So yeah, I think it is fair to ask for proof/link in this case. If you cannot find proof of such a claim, then I don't mind informing the Ungoogled Team so they too can learn the name "D.Draker" and the others that will come by to post the "like". I'll sit on the sidelines... Ball is in your court...

The first Server 2012 ESU update was released in November 2023 so Monthly Rollups or security-only updates released before that can still be applied to Windows 8.0

The last few weeks, or rather the last few months, I have expanded my JavaScript and CSS knowledge considerably. I started to develop not only new custom buttons for the legacy extension Custom Buttons and custom CSS stylesheets, both targeting Mypal 68, but also UC.JS scripts for Mypal 68 and compatible browsers. Additionally, I have tested and analysed all available methods for loading UC.JS scripts. I also put my favoured method, which I presented in the first post of this thread, to the test. The loading method in my download package MYPAL_68_CB_requirements.7z is based on the loading method of Nuchi and Sporif. At the time, I assumed that additional code inside the config.js file was needed to load UC.JS scripts. This code comes from the alice0775 project and, however, it is not needed at all for the loading method I have provided, as I have realised in the last few days. It is only needed if there is no binding via the userchrome.xml file. Fortunately, it didn't do any harm either, but I have nevertheless tidied up my package and got rid of unnecessary ballast. I will now create and upload a new download package which will also contain my fix for the error "ReferenceError: XPCOMUtils is not defined" in two different ways. What I can already say at this point is that my favourite Nuchi-Sporif method is one of the best of all regarding Mypal 68. More on this soon. Greetings from Germany, AstroSkipper

No, no, no, no, no. Again for those in the back row - No, no, no, no, no! Why? Because then the browser opens a new tab when you UNINSTALL the extension! The whole POINT of that MOD is for NO TAB TO BE LAUNCHED when the extension is UNINSTALLED! Especially no PHONE-HOME tab to the HOME PAGE. But why replace the phone-home HOME PAGE URL with a EMPTY TAB URL ??? Try your advice! It launches an empty tab (with a certificate error). Again, the entire PURPOSE of that MODIFICATION is so that I can uninstall the extension WITHOUT ANY TAB AUTO-LAUNCHING. None, naughta, zero, zilch, null, zewo, nula, nol, cero! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_for_the_number_0 Please, please, please - listen to my raving wisdom.

It doesn't explain why people started to see that triggered protection with this release. I assume they are still using their old IP.

Per your provided link, it says it's basically a garbage file (for us, on older OS, which the topic is about), it's allegedly intended to fix a Win 10 icon bug. Edit. Don't you think it's waaaaay too big for that?

Which 100% confirms what I write before about non-standard browsers.

"Major" Chrome release happens every month, not 2 to 3 weeks. But the future of non-standard browsers on XP is getting very grim for us, as you might see with the many reports about Softpedia, Cloudflare "anti-human protection" sites (which are now countless). Oh, but as we saw recently, you have nothing to worry about with your cross-devices identical fingerprint, at least now I know why you were able to pass through cloudfare, while others couldn't.

I don't know, but I always delete it, some reporting tool, maybe?

ProxHTTPSProxy can be configured to the user needs in its configuration file config.ini. And in 360Chrome, as already described by @VistaLover, you can alternatively switch between "Use IE proxy" and "Do not use proxy".

When it comes to my package ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3, closing the main window of ProxHTTPSProxy automatically removes its entries from the system proxy settings. This is not the case when using ProxyMII.

If you want to have a pure ProxHTTPSProxy, then you can use @cmalex's ProxyMII. Read from the section 8. to 8.4.! In case of ProxyMII, however, there is no starter programme, and therefore the necessary settings in the system proxy of Windows XP have to be done manually by the user. And no additional features like minimising to systray and so on are then available.

In Chrome, there should be a setting to use the system proxy which has to be enabled. When starting ProxHTTPSProxy via the PopMenu, my self-created starter programme StartProxy automatically sets the necessary configuration in the system proxy of Windows XP.

My main article even offers a Table of Contents at the begining of the first post. In your case, read from the section 9. to 9.3.3! Following the table of contents, the download can be found in the section 11.2.2.. The download package contains a short and a detailed documentation. What else is supposed to be needed? I think nothing. To answer your question whether it is installed or portable, it is more portable than installed. To be more detailed, you have to install a certificate and some registry settings to let the ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3 run correctly. All has been sufficiently described. But nothing of it is harmful and can easily be removed if necessary. And that's all I'm going to say about it. Read first, then try it out and only if something doesn't work, I'll be happy to help. However, one thing should be clear, I am not a fan of spoon-feeding.

As I don't use 360Chrome 13.5.1030, I can't judge what your problem is. And only one sentence without a concrete description of your issue is simply too little information. BTW, the installation of ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3 can be done in minutes. So, just try it!