Leaderboard

I doubt they was unwitting. I think they knew who pay theme and understand the task very clearly. P.S. Аbout year ago i watched interview with former worker of ruZZia's (government own) TV channel to SotnikTV. He said that they internal chats with instructions and "talking points" was in Telegram. When he asked his superiors why Telegram (he naively thought that Telegram was fighting FSB) he was answered - that was show for the fools and Telegram is under tight control of FSB.

You know, as a person who live in home that recently was trembling when air-defense rocket intercepted ruZZian missile (that was aiming at my block) i see your post as incredibly dumb and ignorant.

A small note. You probably meant rather "Auf Wiedersehen!". I’ll say then:

A collection of posts helping people realise Firefox is not what it claims to be, far from it. Working solutions to block its telemetry can also be posted here.

Why such a misleading name, then? Pretending to be VPN/Proxy, when in fact it's not? Also, kids these days, several megs to "fix an icon", I don't believe it, do what you want with me.

Because it's irrelevant since Vista and ASLR enabled executables are a thing. The OS always picks random base address for ASLR enabled executables and is smart about it to not duplicate it in memory across multiple processes that share the same executable binaries.

You are grabbing values from the System Test Suite. These values are not CPU-specific. That's what the CPU Test Suite is for.

No. What am I to win here? I already lost. As I already stated, your CPU is definitely weaker than mine. But how much weaker can only investigated if there are meaningful values. It can only be solved statistically and thus mathematically.

You are somehow talking your head off here. You and only you were trying, statistically completely absurdly, to make a statement about how much faster my CPU is than yours from artificial, completely arbitrarily defined values. And by that I mean the CPU score, since you didn't offer detailed values. That is statistically and mathematically pure nonsense. If you really want to know more about our CPUs in a more meaningful way, you have to compare the values in the section CPU Test Suite to get information how many times faster my CPU is than yours. So please be more serious when making statements!

New, for you exclusively. Sparing my likes fort tomorrow, for you. https://msfn.org/board/topic/186450-firefox-a-promised-land-of-privacy-that-never-happened-look-elsewhere-unless-youre-a-coder-with-the-ability-to-stop-the-enormous-data-mining/

Did FF change? No, so it's still relevant, but you're very welcome to make a new one.

You naughty boy! Confess you also delete the rest of the Hellload garbage files @D.Draker taught us to.

You're right, and I have no problems admitting I sometimes overpush, but then again, it's a standard practice to mask reporting tools under the guise of casual files, hence the oddly big size. So fair is fair, I accept your opinion, too.

Can somebody on windows XP try 4pda links above with latest New Moon or Serpent please?

Uh didn't know that, if ASLR for vista+ then no point to care of enable.

The GeForce 6200 AGP is indeed a good one. It is absolutely silent as my version is passively cooled. Unfortunately, my motherboard supports only AGP 4x although the GeForce 6200 is an AGP 8x one. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-6200-agp.c2419

Guten Tag! Yes, fixed it couple of minutes later, you still had original post loaded. I wished for GeForce 6200 back in the day. When I was looking, it was the only card still available for AGP bus. Definitely better than GeForce4 MX 440. Before 3DMark, there was Final Reality (Second Reality vibes). It has reference to Max Payne released few years later.

Classics, accuse the enemy of your own crimes.

It's not "crusade", this topic is intended to state the obvious facts. Why I "can't use Firefox but only r3dfox"? You personally forbid me?

@NotHereToPlayGames BTW, here is the corrected link in the way uCyborg posted it: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Pentium-4-280GHz-vs-Intel-Atom-N450/m3163vsm3190

Thanks for the link! However, I never used 3DMark before as I am not a gamer. The graphics on my Windows XP computer is very weak anyways.

And then Adieu, Goodbye, Auf Wiedersehen for today? I feel like you guys are making another bloated thread on MSFN. 5 pages already xD

So are you going to fill in a "zero" for the failed tests? Or just geomean a smaller subset? A geometric mean is the nth root of a product with n factors. If you set one value to zero, the whole product will be zero and the nth root of zero is zero. My answer to your first question is therefore no. You can't set a value from your data to zero. And yes, you have to reduce the set of values, i.e. you have to build a smaller subset by removing characteristics.

New build of Serpent/UXP for XP! Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20240907-3219d2d-uxp-a088e79f72-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20240907-3219d2d-uxp-a088e79f72-xpmod.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20240907-3219d2d-uxp-a088e79f72-xpmod-ia32.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32 NM28XP build: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240907-d849524bd-uxp-a088e79f72-xpmod.7z Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240907-d849524bd-uxp-a088e79f72-xpmod-ia32.7z Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240907-d849524bd-uxp-a088e79f72-xpmod-sse.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20240907-d849524bd-uxp-a088e79f72-xpmod.7z Official UXP changes picked since my last build: - Issue #2559 - Implement hashbang grammar (7cc9551e79) - [DOM] Stop exposing NotifyPaintEvent to web content. (b9e7ecd8bc) - [js] Simplify with-env handling in FetchName (8f31479968) - [js xpconnect] Fix error handling in xpc::CreateSandboxObject (ec8793a094) No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build. No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build. My changes since my last build: - js/xpconnect: pre-C++17 fix (a088e79f72) Update Notice: - You may delete file named icudt*.dat inside program folder when updating from old releases. * Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.

Sunshine, at least you could say what OS\Browser on your screenshot. I tested in 3 browsers on my XP - NM 2024-03-21\Serpent v52.9.0 (2024-08-21) and Arctic Foxie's 360ChromePortable_13.5.1030_r8. All not showing pictures like on my screenshot.

Instead of linking to something from 2016, why won't you tell us about the latest Google "achievement", another anti-feature to be included in the next Supermium release? https://developers.google.com/privacy-sandbox/private-advertising/enrollment It has a mysterious name "Privacy Sandbox Attestations". Already there, in Chrome v.128, maybe even lower.

I have recently been re-testing modern versions of Java under Windows XP, having figured out many fixes and workarounds to issues that were present on these newer versions when being ran on that operating system. To be more precise, i have managed to solve a crash with keyboard input, the java control panel refusing to launch, java applets being broken, as well as JavaFX applications and its WebKit component not running. Ultimately, this has allowed me to get the latest and newest revision of Java 8, which currently is 8u421, running on XP without any major bugs or glitches. This version needs XomPie in order to run, however, instructions for slightly older versions of Java are also available, having been revised to include all of the mentioned workarounds, including JavaFX compatibility, so people can run more modern and stable versions on their original installs. These are available on my website: http://neonfloppy.sytes.net/software/winxp/java/ Moreover, Windows Vista can also run 8u421, provided Extended Kernel or XomPie are installed on the system. Previous versions have also been revised, for those still running vanilla Vista. More details here: http://neonfloppy.sytes.net/software/winvista/java/

you may turn on firefox compat mode to see if problem persists.

semi-OT: finally got my firefox55norust creating working build, by specifying `--disable-sandbox' switch in .mozconfig. maybe finally I can revert all XP+ only commits and creating a working XP 56-ish build.

normal UXP builds require SSE2, while IA32 builds don't require it. please checkout FAQ in 1st reply in this thread. search "c000001d" and read the answer.

oops, a slash is missing in packing script. reuploaded.

please checkout 1st reply in this thread.

Interesting to see a K-Meleon based FF45 ESR SSE... I like the simple UI of K-Meleon and porting it to FF45 would definitely reduce the strain on the CPU. Australis sucks.

A modern Opera Presto browser! -kidding! Kidding! I know you’re a mozilla guy... I’m not really sure, at this moment... I will try to think of a good thing, I suppose there is the question, what can you build that you haven't yet?