Leaderboard

Half of flags in that list are depreciated, The list needs to be brushed through.

Yep! I had a lot of trouble with Avast. And it is much too bloated. On the other hand, its detection rate is quite good. BTW, one can clearly see that the internet is quite forgetful, as in the case of avast! Premier 2015 10.4.2233. It is therefore always a good idea to establish an own download archive as, e.g, I have been doing this from the very first.

@Multibooter Avast Antivirus is not a pure offline scanner. You should use a real offline scanner as, for example, eScanAV Anti-Virus Toolkit (MWAV) if it works on systems with an SSE only CPU.

The BSI's job is not to recommend antivirus programmes , but to warn of security risks and dangers , as in the Kaspersky case. So, I can only say:

I'm NOT arguing with anyone, I'm politely asking @IDA-RE-thingsto provide proof. @IDA-RE-things joined very recently, and already started to accuse our veteran member win32, counting likes, so yeah, looks like he doesn't have a real active project at MSFN, and this question should be addressed to him, not me. Edit: I don't "feel", it's written publicly, in plain text.

I quoted this post so @IDA-RE-thingswon't be able to edit it out. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1268547

There is NO language barrier. I know English since I was 5. Probably better than you. @IDA-RE-thingsthings wrote very clearly: "He" (win32) took "my workaround for slow startup (I think borrowed), which I implemented before in my code".

Hello and welcome! You've been missing a lot of fun!

Existing Windows Installation can be modified with Additional Drivers and Tweaks by using Setup without having install.wim selected as Installation Source. I was not aware of this useful option and the previous version crashed on this point as Sonic mentioned earlier.

https://imgur.com/iGnKAtI Use the Carbon dark theme

You mean I too need to use Bing only? Fine, here's a screen with Bing,

@Jody Thornton and I, we both see this as an optimisation made by @win32, unless it's proven otherwise, it should be the default opinion since Supermium is developed solely by win32. But then again, you're very welcome to take the matter up to the github admins.

NO! We were one million times trough it! Supermium is not open source, neither the dll which is published by @IDA-RE-things.

Fair enough. But I really really really FAIL to see why it has become a DEFENSIVE STANCE. Are these not OPEN SOURCE GITHUB COMMITS? I do not have a GitHub account and, admittedly, "could care less" who borrowed from whom. I myself have seen DOZENS of "my" 360Chrome mods borrowed by various members/countries/websites - don't care, I actually find it as more of a pat on the back that "my" work made it into other people's projects. It's also quite cool and a pat on the back when I see my XP-themed mods make it into YouTube videos - don't care that these videos don't even cite MSFN as where they obtained their XP-themed 360Chrome. These were over a year ago, but I'm sure they are still out there - don't care if they are or are not. Now then, having said that, if I made money on these mods, then yeah, it would be a different story. I guess my only takeaway is this - if you feel "win32" would be equally defensive, then shouldn't this "argument" be at GITHUB instead of here at MSFN? I mean, aren't BOTH of these projects hosted at GITHUB? If terms of service agreements were violated, then there are proper channels to go through to get one or both of these projects removed.

Here's the quoted post.

I too see the those squares, along with Dixel, Karla and the OP himself. Any explanations for these? I assume neither of us are on XP.

Of course, it does. However, it's probably better to ignore such unqualified comments about the age of hardware. But I'm not that kind of person.

I always use RunAsDate from NirSoft for this purpose.

Thanks for your confirmation! I also thought that a time bomb had been implemented in the executable. McAfee probably wanted to prevent users from using outdated versions of Stinger. But I wanted a confirmation from others to be sure it's not related to my system only.

Welcome! Vista users is what we really need. What does 7601 in the nick mean?

McAfee Stinger seems to have abandoned Windows XP in 2021. For testing purpose, I tried to open several stinger32.exe files from 2021 which are supposed to be still XP-compatible but I am always getting the following messsge: "McAfee Stinger executable has been modified and may be infected". Can anyone confirm this?

Thanks for your interest! In the end, I couldn't figure out why the described issue occurred in one Windows XP partition but not in the other. One of the rare issues that I couldn't fix. The good thing is that I am now using a much better startup manager. So, thanks to Glarysoft for this issue!

Of course! I am definitely not interested in collecting malicious files. I don't put that kind of filth on my disc. Thanks to good real-time protection and my online behaviour!

Be on your guard with it! Blacklisting certain ciphers makes your HTTP2 fingerprint 100% unique, just sayin'. NSA (or whom you were afraid earlier, I forgot) will place red flags on such visits. Probably better to not touch that values at all and run default.

with more fixes, it works. after porting/restoring something for RNG, it even works in Neptune!