Leaderboard

After some off-and-on research, I've been able to create my own userscript for my bill-pay website I ended up opting for today + 3. // ==UserScript== // @require http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.3/jquery.min.js // @grant GM_addStyle // ==/UserScript== var theDate = new Date(); var myNewDate = new Date(theDate); myNewDate.setDate(myNewDate.getDate()+3); var dd = String(myNewDate.getDate()).padStart(2, '0'); var mm = String(myNewDate.getMonth() + 1).padStart(2, '0'); var yyyy = myNewDate.getFullYear(); myNewDateFormatted = mm + '/' + dd + '/' + yyyy; $("<CSS_SELECTOR_FOR_DATE_FIELD_YOU_ARE_TARGETING").val (myNewDateFormatted);

Server 2008 SP2 = Server 2008 + SP2 I think you just confused it with Server 2008 R2 (and Server 2008 R2 SP1), which is Win7 (and Win7 SP1) based...

The website trackers are likely wrong in the low end. There are more computers online than are capable of being tracked. Especially since we know that these sites are "trackers" and also advertising platforms, they are missing the large portion of computers running ad blockers or other types of URL filtering, not to mention custom user agents and of course, any computer that doesn't use a web browser such as appliances. For example, does that 5.7 Million Windows XP number include XP Embedded systems? Does it include the huge amount of Bank ATMs?

@raiden89 Thank you for posting your screen shot of "New Acrylic". It's helpful to see that what you mean by "blur" is not what most people mean by "blur". Yes, you have a nice skin that makes content of windows behind the title bar very dark or very blue, but the text showing underneath is just as sharp as when it is not covered up by the title bar. We can see the words "Style details" with the same sharpness as before, but the colors have been changed by the title bar on top of it. This makes the words "Style details" a bit harder to read, but the text itself is not blurred. Contrast your screen shot with mine, running AeroGlass in Windows 10 Version 1909 (soon to be upgraded!) You can see Firefox with a blurred title bar, making the "Quick actions" truly blurry, not sharp, in contrast with the "Notifications & actions" text above.

@dmiranda i've done some quick benchmaks with this tool: https://github.com/renaissance-benchmarks/renaissance using java 8 update 20 (i couldn't find update 17), update 152 and update 291. test were run with the following commands, picking the best result for each iteration: rx-scrabble -r 16, akka-uct -r 4, fj-kmeans -r 4 i couldn't find any significant performance difference. everything seems within the margin of error. maybe with other applications or tasks there is difference, but for general data processing and I/O seems the same. results are as follows (respectively: rx-scrabble, akka-uct, fj-kmeans): update 291: 485.814 ms, 49395.213 ms, 7072.282 ms update 152: 486.348 ms, 48090.700 ms. 7086.101 ms update 21: 488.517 ms, 51775.709 ms, 6663.593 ms i guess the advantage of using newer updates is security enhancements and running modern applications that do require newer updates to run at all.

The same person who released FlashPatch (which, as you noted, requires Vista+) has been now releasing CleanFlash, a "sanitised" version of Chinese Flash, currently at version 34.0.0.155; the original distribution is batch-file based, so it should be XP-compatible (but I can't test this here...); the second distribution is installer-based, to run it under XP you need .NET FW 4.0+ It is advertised that ALL Chinese telemetry has been removed, along with geo-limitations ("flash.cn" provided files are meant to run in mainland China, only... ) Enjoy!

@WalksInSilence , at least not Corsair xD .

weird (that corona wont fly away)

My, how things have changed around here! Just dropping in to say hello to the community and to wish everyone a Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, and a Happy New Year!

Please note that the latest version of vLite is UNABLE to integrate Service Pack 2 (SP2) into an existing Windows Vista with SP1 ISO image at the moment. To obtain a Windows Vista ISO with SP2 already integrated, you have two choices: Download the ISO image from your MSDN or TechNet account (if you have one) Use the reverse integration method to slipstream SP2 into an existing image of Windows Vista w/ SP1 Several guides to reverse integrate SPs can be found here1, here2, and here3. These guides can be used to integrate SP2 and should be valid when integrating any future service packs as well. If you encounter any difficulties following the above-mentioned guides, please reply to this thread and more experienced members will try to help you. 1, 2, 3 Please note that the above-mentioned guides are being supplied "as is". MSFN assumes no liability for damages, direct or consequential, which may result from the use of said guides.