Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/25/2021 in Posts

  1. Lately I was trying to report a bug with rivatuner and msi afterburner. When you try to display anything in OSD, riva tuner will infinitely crash. Inspite of system requirement being windows xp, I've only met stupid moderator saying that they only focus on "modern" oses and they will not fix it for 8.1. WTF??? is it working on windows 7? Thanks Edit: Hehe seems like I got banned on their forum. No big deal I guess system requirements means nothing to them.
    2 points
  2. Thank you, that makes the sad scenario very clear. So basically, they're now all in it together!
    2 points
  3. Also, the www.update.microsoft.com SHA1 certificate expires on May 5th 2021. Which is in 9 days. https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=www.update.microsoft.com
    1 point
  4. Well I did check that there were no absolute paths in the script which would need changing. It's something I'm well used to with a multi-boot system where the paths are not necessarily standard! I couldn't see anything obvious though.
    1 point
  5. Hey guys. Are there any news about Extended Kernel 32 Bit? Is it still under development?
    1 point
  6. Doesn't find a CSS selector for the memorized password dropdown (must be browser-level), but useful tool to keep around, thanks, adding it to the arsenal.
    1 point
  7. Binary Outcast's "DOM Inspector" extension is install-able in Borealis Navigator, perhaps installing that in bnavigator will help? https://interlink-addons.binaryoutcast.com/addon/dom-inspector/ In this post of the now closed "Part 2" thread, my friend (I hope) @Dave-H wrote: Well, I didn't say that "current" Firefox is now WebKit/Chromium based per se, did I? This isn't (yet?) the case of Microsoft Edge abandoning its initial engine (EdgeHTML) in favour of the Chromium one (becoming now what most, affectionately, call "ChrEdge"), or even the case of original Opera moving from Presto to Webkit ... But, make no mistake, they are using Chromium code inside the current incarnation of their browser engine... So, technically, not Webkit/Chromium itself, but at the same time very closely related to it (while not being called that) ... In a somewhat broader spectrum, one must take into account the close affiliation that exists between Google and Mozilla: Mozilla Firefox ships with "Google Search" as its default search engine and this fact alone is a major source of income for Mozilla; Google pay them big because they get to harvest all this telemetry data from Firefox users (not bothered to change the default search engine to something else...). Apparently, telemetry data from Firefox is worth a lot to Google, so their devs take extra care when introducing (on their own, most of the times) "new" web standards and other Chrome-isms that these could be ported fairly easily to "current" Firefox; on the Mozilla camp, the devs, via the "Chrome-parity" policy, are quick to implement these Chrome-isms into Firefox, too, because if users leave Firefox (to Chrome) as a result of a popular site (e.g. Facebook) malfunctioning, Mozilla will lose revenue from Google and other sponsors... Also, Google do need the existence of at least one other "competitor" (but not really ) browser in the market, or else they'll get hit with anti-trust/monopoly lawsuits in the US and other territories... Do you now see the whole picture? In closing: Don't be surprised that "things" that are originally designed by Google for Google Chrome work well with latest Mozilla Firefox; it's a case of "symbiosis" between the two... Cheers (and apologies for the OT...)
    1 point
  8. It no longer connects to their servers. I tried
    1 point
  9. New build of Firefox 45ESR: Test binary: SSE https://o.rthost.win/gpc/files1.rt/firefox-45.9.33-20210424-aaa1e5cf5-win32-sse.7z IA32 https://o.rthost.win/gpc/files1.rt/firefox-45.9.33-20210424-aaa1e5cf5-win32-ia32.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/gpc/files1.rt/firefox-45.9.33-20210424-aaa1e5cf5-win64.7z repo: https://github.com/roytam1/mozilla45esr Changes since my last build: - configure: change win64 subsystem version to 5.02 for XP x64 edition (e2e08b13d) - import change from tenfourfox: - #640: update Readability to tip (8c52b1a32) (47e27a4ec) - bump version to 45.9.33 (5c4d03208) - import changes from tenfourfox: - #642: M1677940 M1698503 M1699835 (modified) (4f70dd5c9) - #642: update eTLDs, HSTS (0136f8aca) (aaa1e5cf5)
    1 point
  10. New build of post-deprecated Serpent/moebius for XP! * Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual. ** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions. Test binary: Win32 http://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20210424-3b8a3eb13-xpmod.7z Win64 http://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20210424-3b8a3eb13-xpmod.7z repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55 Repo changes: - import changes from tenfourfox: - #642: M1677940 M1698503 M1699835 (modified) (4f70dd5c9) - #642: update eTLDs, HSTS (0136f8aca) (3b8a3eb13)
    1 point
  11. New build of Serpent/UXP for XP! Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20210424-d9177d1-uxp-5e705bd50-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20210424-d9177d1-uxp-5e705bd50-xpmod.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20210424-d9177d1-uxp-5e705bd50-xpmod-ia32.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32 NM28XP build: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.3a1.win32-git-20210424-24e3839cb-uxp-5e705bd50-xpmod.7z Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.3a1.win32-git-20210424-24e3839cb-uxp-5e705bd50-xpmod-sse.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.3a1.win64-git-20210424-24e3839cb-uxp-5e705bd50-xpmod.7z Official UXP changes since my last build: - Issue #1761 - Enable use of Tauthon instead of Python 2.7 at build (264b79b31) - Merge pull request 'Allow use of Tauthon instead of Python 2.7' (#1762) from OlCe1/UXP:tauthon-build-support into master (6f50c402b) - [DOM] Add missing IDL definitions for CSP .nonce attributes. (cf3b5cb6c) - [WebGL] Bind framebuffer before DrawBuffers/ReadBuffer selection. (88a34442a) - [Network] Solve type mismatch in AllowPort(). (5e705bd50) Official Basilisk changes since my last build: - Back-end branch pointer update. (d9177d1) Official Pale-Moon changes since my last build: - Back-end branch pointer update (unstable 2021-04-02) (2144e49f2) - [SSUAO] Feed Twitter a native UA so it'll stop blocking. (4f00b1269) - Blocklist update (ef31a26d2) - Issue #1866 - Add controls for preferred color scheme. (01642a99f) - Issue #1701 - Allow Open All in Tabs for containers with only one child URI (f82bb7594) - Issue #1816 - Warn before opening many URI nodes in tabs (55c31710a) - Merge pull request 'Warn before opening many URI nodes in tabs' (#1869) from FranklinDM/Pale-Moon:issue-1816-work into master (7a9159ee8) - Merge pull request 'Allow Open All in Tabs for containers with only one child URI' (#1868) from FranklinDM/Pale-Moon:issue-1701-work into master (24e3839cb) My changes since my last build: - Skipped "Blocklist update (ef31a26d2)" - partly imported from bk55: - import changes from tenfourfox: - #642: M1699835 (modified) - #642: update eTLDs (3348d8960)
    1 point
  12. So is Firefox 88 actually now a Chromium browser, or is it just aping a Chromium browser? I thought the Mozilla devs were still working with their own engine, not now using Chromium code. if the latter is the case, that's really sad.
    1 point
  13. ... With all due respect, "current" Firefox, as in ex "Firefox Quantum" (v>56), now "Firefox Browser" (latest is v88.0), is but a mere "Chromium" fork itself in so many ways under the hood/bonnet, that only its front-end somehow differentiates it from "proper" Google Chrome ; in what is known as "Google-parity" among Mozilla devs, they have been constantly aping all "Chrome-isms" over the last years to the point I, myself, consider current Firefox as yet another Chromium clone... FWIW, I have been following Firefox's "progression" ("regression", if you ask me ...) quite closely over the last decade or so, having been a Nightly Tester with a Bugzilla account since Firefox v21 ... So, I'm not really taken aback that Google Drive does work "fine in current versions of Firefox" , I'll have to side with @ArcticFoxie on this: Google make sure "their" Services work best/exclusively on Chromium derivatives and current Firefox can be considered as being one of them... Another case in point is the Google-owned Widevine CDM, which currently only works in "Chromium" browsers and current Firefox; in fact, Firefox's implementation of WV is almost identical to the one in Chrome, so much so that when Moonchild tried to backport it to official Basilisk 52/UXP, he failed miserably; that "pure" Chromium code was impossible to adapt to Fx52esr derived UXP, as a result, Basilisk is being shipped with broken WV since August 2019 (!) ; MCP's plan is to remove WV support altogether from that browser ... Cheers
    1 point
  14. Judging by the "wsus.reg" on the desktop... You're probably not using the normal windoze update servers. This poster is banned now so they wont be responding, but i highly suspect people are not lying when they say the original MS servers dont cater to 2000 and XP anymore. Third-party WSUS servers are the only way to do it reliably since I think almost a year ago now.
    1 point
  15. here they stopped use of landlines by increasing price of contract to ridiciliously high compared gsm prices then stopped selling landlines with excuse nobody wants use. Sure nobody does when it was ridiously high priced to push cell phones. So there is no option. I here. I chose less evil option. Older early 2000 GSM mobile phones (got few nokia, siemens and samsung ones). In finland we got good GSM coverage, last time had call dropping 12 years ago. I miss landline as option. all my cellphones from late1990/early 2000 have survived and still operated. Few of them needed fresh battery after been sitting forever in closet. Back in day cell phones were built to last too but one point they started reduce body/build quality and blocking repairs. All I need to take apart my 6600 is needle. Not all cell phones are total garbage and breaking. Most just think cell phone as iPhone or other non locked down device not oldschool one. If they ever drop GSM I stop using phones. Not going to modern smartphone in any case.
    1 point
  16. That did the trick! Manually downloaded the *.sst files manually and then ran... updroots authroots.sst updroots updroots.sst updroots -l roots.sst updroots -d delroots.sst updroots -l -u disallowedcert.sst Thanks for the input Dave! Still havent figured out why heinoganda's Cert_Updater 1.6 doesn't run on my XP and there is nothing blocking it? It works fine when tested in W7 and W10... Anyway, I got the certificates updated on my XP by doing it manually as mentioned above.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...