Leaderboard

Special Thanks to Russian Guys of Driver Pack Team ,BlackWingCat, Four Finger,IVAN Intel HD 4200\4400\4600\P4600\ P4700\5000\5100 Iris DRIVER :: 32BIT LINK :: http://drivers.drp.su/Video_Intel-XP/Intel/FORCED/5x86/Haswell_6.14.10.5445/Intel-FORCED-5x86-Haswell_6.14.10.5445-drp.exe 64BIT LINK :: http://drivers.drp.su/Video_Intel-XP/Intel/FORCED/5x64/Haswell_6.14.10.5445/Intel-FORCED-5x64-Haswell_6.14.10.5445-drp.exe 32Bit Leaked :: https://web.archive.org/web/20131108095246/http://downloadmirror.intel.com/22875/a08/WinXP32.zip Intel Skylake Graphics :: Intel LAN Latest :: 32Bit :: http://drivers.drp.su/LAN_Intel/Intel/FORCED/5x86/OLD/Intel-FORCED-5x86-OLD-drp.exe 64Bit:: http://drivers.drp.su/LAN_Intel/Intel/FORCED/5x64/OLD/Intel-FORCED-5x64-OLD-drp.exe Management Engine Interface :: 32bit:: http://drivers.drp.su/Chipset/Intel/WinAll/Chipset/9.4.0.1007_HECI/Intel-WinAll-Chipset-9.4.0.1007_HECI-drp.exe intel(R) Display Audio 32Bit:: http://drivers.drp.su/Sounds_HDMI/Intel/FORCED/Audio/5x86/2807/Intel-FORCED-Audio-5x86-2807-drp.exe Bluetooth Hands-free Audio Device 32bit :: http://drivers.drp.su/Bluetooth/CSR/Allx86/CSR-Allx86-drp.exe Bluetooth Stereo Audio http://drivers.drp.su/Bluetooth/CSR/Allx86/CSR-Allx86-drp.exe More will be added soon Please stay tuned

Straight from MS probably yeah its allowed

I have been adding all my custom icons to the shell32.dll.mui file in C:\Windows\System32\en-US, you can make a copy of the shell32.dll and add all the custom icons you want then export the icon folder as a res file using Restorator making sure you only save the modified resources, then make a copy of the shell32.dll.mui file and open the file in Restorator, then drag and drop the res file you made on the open file in the left column in Restorator, you should now be able to save the modified file. After that you will need to take ownership of the shell32.dll.mui file then rename it to shell32.dll.mui.bak, then copy the modified shell32.dll.mui file back to that folder, you will then have to restart explorer or restart windows to take effect, you may also nee to clear the icon cache. To clear the icon cache I just use a batch file with this in it. @ECHO OFF cd\ taskkill /f /IM explorer.exe SET FILE98=*.db SET PATH98=%SYSTEMDRIVE%\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Explorer\ SET FILE99=IconCache.db SET PATH99=%SYSTEMDRIVE%\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local CD /d %userprofile%\AppData\Local DEL IconCache.db /a IF EXIST %FILE99% ( attrib -H "%PATH99%\%FILE99%" del "%PATH99%\%FILE99%" ) IF EXIST %FILE98% ( attrib -H "%PATH98%\%FILE98%" del "%PATH98%\%FILE98%" ) IF EXIST IconCache.db ( DEL IconCache.db /a ) CD /d %userprofile%\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows del /f /s /q Explorer\*.* del /f /s /q Explorer\iconcache*.* del /f /s /q Explorer\thumbcache*.* DEL /f /s /q Explorer\thumbcache*.* /a START %windir%\"explorer.exe" EXIT Good luck, this is the only way I know works without causing a black screen. Unless Tihiy can give you a better solution.

StartIsBack++ 2.8 BETA2 http://www.startisback.com/StartIsBackPlusPlus_setup.exe

Please, refer to the end of the following topic, it is probably the same issue.

I was recently on a tour to Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant and saw some PCs running XP

because of broken javascript (in pm27's view): 23:49:37.582 SyntaxError: invalid for/in left-hand side 1 app.js:1:234335 and that `for` block looks like this: for(const i of e.split("&")){let[e,a]=i.replace(/\+/g," ").split("=");a=void 0===a?null:o(a,t),n(o(e,t),a,r)} in MDN, it stated that fx < 51 using `for...of` with `const` keyword will cause syntax error. if you have link to userstyles.org, let it load and view source. find "stylish-code" line, click on the css link, copy all and then paste it on new style.

@jaclaz, the problem is no matter what you run on the internet there's a security risk. I've been using computers for 20 years and never had a problem with viruses yet. It's a matter of taking advantage of the right tools, like noscript and turning on javascript only when needed. I do upgrade software when it's worth using but not for the sake of it. My hunch is Mozilla is desperate for market share and they need people off the older versions and onto quantum and they use security fears as a way to nudge people in that direction. It used to work but it doesn't so much anymore.