I have (WinXP) these hard drive 'trees' for NewMoon and Basilisk Browsers -->
C:\Documents and Settings\MyID\Application Data\Moonchild\Basilisk
C:\Documents and Settings\MyID\Application Data\Moonchild Productions\Basilisk
C:\Documents and Settings\MyID\Application Data\Moonchild Productions\Pale Moon
Okay, I would like to have installed and use both Basilisk52 (ver) and Basilisk55 (ver) Browsers. Does that present any kind of problem, to have BOTH of them installed (active) ???
Also, there is the MOONCHILD 'tree' and the MOONCHILD PRODUCTIONS 'tree' (see above). Is the MOONCHILD 'tree' left over (not needed) somehow from a previous PALE MOON Browser installation?
For me, BK52 Browser seems a bit 'lagging' overall. So, I am wondering if BK55 Browser might work a bit better for me. Even though I realize that BK55 Browser is LESS updated, and ROY recommends BK52 Browser. So, any reply about this, much appreciated.
Added: Okay, I have BOTH BK52 and BK55 installed and working here. I am getting a BETTER result using BK55 too. BK52 seems to 'force' HARD DRIVE FILE CACHE access MUCH more than BK55 does. NO IDEA why that might be happening that way. This could be something to do with MY personal settings, is what I mean to suggest it as a possibility. I am just PLEASED that the BK55 Browser is working as well as it is (here anyway).
@Jody Thornton <-- Please see what I said above on BK52 vs BK55 Browsers.