evilvoice Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 the speedup uses the exact same regtweak that has been posted...run reader speedup and try to load journal viewer and see if it works, ill bet it doesnt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeenThereB4 Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 just thought i'd mention, Adobe Reader Speedup disables WISPTIS.exe from loading when Reader starts.Are you sure about that, it did not do that for me the last time that I used it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybpsych Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 it's working for me ...i'm using ARSU 1.28 ...btw, u must follow the instruction carefully when trying the Tweak to disable WISPTIS.exe ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybpsych Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 = removed - double-post = Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creopard Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 also check out "Adobe Reader 7.0 Beta Full"http://ardownload.adobe.com/pub/adobe/read...70_enu_full.exe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DisabledTrucker Posted September 15, 2004 Author Share Posted September 15, 2004 @RyanVM,I am assuming that I wont need to use any switches with your program and can call it from cmdlines.txt? Also, I would like to say thanks for pointing me to the right place to obtain your .net1.1 file as well, it's saving me some space and time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanVM Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 I'm not sure if you can call it from cmdlines.txt or not, since it runs an MSI file. You might actually be OK, though, since it is calling msiexec. I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't work, though, and you had to run it from RunOnceEx or GuiRunOnce.Yes, it runs switchless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdmcmahon Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 FYI - I am in the US and using the Central European version in my build, it works just as fine as everything else. No major difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanVM Posted September 15, 2004 Share Posted September 15, 2004 Other than being 20MB bigger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DisabledTrucker Posted September 15, 2004 Author Share Posted September 15, 2004 Thanks, now to grow another brain cell so I can learn this RunOnceEx or GuiRunOnce method Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanVM Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 Well, this is embarrassing. Can anybody send me a copy of my acrobat 6.0.2 installer? I accidentally corrupted my copy and can't access it anymore.PLEASE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prathapml Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 Oh no...The source is not there now?Well, fortunately I downloaded the previous release of yours, (no printme, and all that...). E-mailing it to the mailID you gave me. Should reach you in about half-an-hour (sick connection speeds, at my end). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trekker Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 I use Orca for changing file version/size info.Hi!It's almost done. But I have a question about the file version/size info. I don't understand how it works. Here's my question:When I first got an admin installation point, I installed from it and version 6.0.2 was installed (confirmed by the about box and the versions of the files). However, now that I edit the MSI, I see that the file version included inside the MSI itself is still the old one (6.0.1.something). Why is this information present inside the MSI? I guess the file size is the same. Do I really have to update it?Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanVM Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 It's not required to update that info, but I think it adds a little polish to the job No idea as to why that info didn't update - probably because Adobe was lazy in how they set up their patch (as if that isn't evident by the lack of an MSP file or by the fact that their "complete" install is just an MSI file, an MST file, and a couple cab archives rather than one unified package). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trekker Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 It's not required to update that info, but I think it adds a little polish to the job No idea as to why that info didn't update - probably because Adobe was lazy in how they set up their patch (as if that isn't evident by the lack of an MSP file or by the fact that their "complete" install is just an MSI file, an MST file, and a couple cab archives rather than one unified package).It does add polish to the job, but since I'll be the only one to use it, I don't think I'll take the time...And I totally agree with you on the fact that Adobe is lazy...Thanks a lot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now