NotHereToPlayGames Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 (edited) Deleting things just for the sake of deleting things could easily send Supermium into the black abyss. Cloudflare "protections" being BROKEN are the "unintended consequence" of deleting code. win32s is wise! I defer to him, of course. I haven't followed the report to see if win32s has chimed in yet or not. In fact, I'll go so far as this, why not "suggest" to win32s to remove Chrome_proxy.exe from Supermium. But "you heard it here first" that I don't see that happening! It's there for a reason and we do have Win10-users that also follow Supermium and whether it evolves into something they/we/me can use in the future. Edited September 6 by NotHereToPlayGames 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxon Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: It's there for a reason and we do have Win10-users that also follow Supermium 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: I myself (even on Win10) do not use it and I ALSO DELETE IT! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 You didn't "say" anything, so I have to assume that you are inferring that other Win10 users are "like me". I assure you that they are not! They may want this file and I am 123,456,789% positive that win32s will NOT remove this file. Go ahead, ask him to, I'll grab the popcorn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-H Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 FWIW, Softpedia works fine here. No Captchas. Supermium 126.0.6478.249 x86 on XP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Dave-H said: FWIW, Softpedia works fine here. No Captchas. Supermium 126.0.6478.249 x86 on XP. Same here. But I only tested in a VM so I was hoping a "real machine" report would trickle in. Personally, I've yet to EVER be able to REPRODUCE any of these "dark theme reports" of 'outdated browser'. These "dark theme reports" show up quite frequently. I've *never* been able to reproduce. At least, "so far"... ie, "these" -- Edited September 6 by NotHereToPlayGames Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 To the best of my knowledge, these "dark theme reports" are always reported by Vista users. Unsure if that is a factor at play here or not. But it is a "variable" in the equation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 Same browser (probably not Thorium/Supermium) + same dark theme + same out-of-date browser problem (when you have shown there is no problem) = usual MSFN member (who wants to make believe there are many). It's math. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxon Posted September 6 Share Posted September 6 20 hours ago, Sampei.Nihira said: Same browser (probably not Thorium/Supermium) + same dark theme + same out-of-date browser problem (when you have shown there is no problem) = usual MSFN member (who wants to make believe there are many). It's math. Sorry, your "math" is terrible. Captcha happens with white theme, look better and read all reports. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1272225 Two members reported it on github, too. No theme specified. Another member here simply hit reply to my screenshot, he reported the same problem. No theme specified. I was the only one with the "Dark Theme" report. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/867 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mina7601 Posted September 10 Share Posted September 10 On 9/6/2024 at 2:52 AM, VistaLover said: ... The v126-r1 one was a "rushed" release only a few days after the previous 126-pre[2] release, just to fix a critical bug with NO SOUND output on XP machines (and pre[2] was released hours after the initial buggy pre[1] release, to fix an "empty UA" bug, that had many cites refusing to connect...). Supermium 126 R2 release: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v126-r2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mina7601 Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 Supermium 126 R3: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v126-r3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxon Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 On 9/11/2024 at 2:18 PM, mina7601 said: Supermium 126 R3: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v126-r3 I officially gave up. Maybe I'll get back to Supermium in a couple of years, I wanted to love it. It's slower and slower with every release. With all those endless fixes, I can't keep up. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 59 minutes ago, Saxon said: It's slower and slower with every release. I'll have to do some testing. But I do know this to be the case with all of the UXP browsers here at MSFN. They just get slower and slower and slower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-H Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 Supermium works fine here, I'm still gobsmacked that there is a browser based on Chromium 126 which works on Windows XP! It's missing a few things which I've got very attached to with 360Chrome, such as double-clicking to close tabs, and automatically opening bookmarks in new tabs. There is a 'Chrome Plus' add-on for Chromium with gives those facilities, and I'm using it on Supermium on Windows 10, but of course it won't work on XP. Thorium has the double click to close tabs built into it, and I'm going to try and persuade win32ss to add it to Supermium as well. If he does, I will probably go over to using Supermium as my default browser on XP. It's disappointing that Thorium Legacy is now four Chromium versions behind Supermium, and there seems to be no sign of any update coming. Also, the font problem on forums.digitalspy.com on XP has now been fixed in Supermium, but it's still no good in Thorium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 I plan to downgrade my Acer Aspire One POS with only 1 GB RAM from XP x86 to Windows 2000. Supermium's GitHub page cites in the "future" section that Windows 2000 will be supported. Not sure what effect this will have yet. I only know that the Intel Atom N450 CPU really does not play well with *any* XP-capable web browser. Really is the BIGGEST waste of money I ever spent money on! Its only non-frustration-inducing functionality is to use it as an oversized CALCULATOR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxon Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 11 hours ago, Dave-H said: persuade win32ss Could you please persuade win32ss to base the browser on a China fork, a very good one, that @Dixel found? That fork is based on Brave, which is open-source. It would solve the bugs and speed up the process, it's not like when building from scratch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now