Jump to content

Last versions of software for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008

WinClient5270

By WinClient5270
in Windows Vista

 Share

Recommended Posts


66cats

66cats

Posted
Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, Dixel said:

"Unknown organisation" must have its own ways:buehehe:

Nothing original, it's just XP   BTW, here's that 115 backport in Vista 64 October '22 extended kernel.

 

Edit: Sure enough, isn't working on extended kernel Vista.

 

Edited by Tripredacus
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dixel

Dixel

Posted
Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, 66cats said:

Nothing original, it's just XP

I thought using hacked(modded) XP ISO versions was banned here, and even discussing it, especially posting screenshots.

Edited by Tripredacus
5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
66cats

66cats

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Dixel said:

I thought using hacked(modded) XP ISO versions was banned here, and even discussing it, especially posting screenshots.

My apologies, didn't know, i'm new. The point's it works fine, just a typical heavy modern browser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saxon

Saxon

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Vistapocalypse said:

This is not a thread about Windows 10, Windows XP or even extended kernel for Vista x64. :angry:

I’ve been reading good things about Supermium at other forums lately. Kudos to @win32 for this remarkable achievement! :worship:

While reading is good, fancy to share your personal experience with Supermium on Vista x64?

I'll then maybe consider switching from Vista x86 to Vista x64.

 
4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mina7601

mina7601

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, 66cats said:

My apologies, didn't know, i'm new.

Well, just for future reference:

https://msfn.org/board/guidelines/

Quote

1.a This is not a warez site! Links/Requests to warez and/or illegal material (e.g., cracks, serials, etc.) will not be tolerated. Discussion of circumventing WGA/activation/timebombs/license restrictions, use of keygens, or any other illegal activity, including, but not limited to, requests for help where pirated software is being used or being discussed, will also not be tolerated. Offenders may be banned on first violation.

Edited by mina7601
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vistapocalypse

Vistapocalypse

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Saxon said:

I'll then maybe consider switching from Vista x86 to Vista x64.

No reason for that, since Supermium supports Vista x86 and Vista x64 is unsuitable for your Haswell hardware in any case. I’m certain you have other devices anyway, so I consider your post to be just another of your ad hominem attacks against me. :thumbdown

2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saxon

Saxon

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Vistapocalypse said:

No reason for that, since Supermium supports Vista x86 and Vista x64 is unsuitable for your Haswell hardware in any case. I’m certain you have other devices anyway, so I consider your post to be just another of your ad hominem attacks against me. :thumbdown

No, I didn't attack you, if you don't have that experience, simply say it, but don't accuse me of something I didn't do. I'm aware MSFN is an international forum, in case you have troubles reading what I ask, I'd be more than happy to translate it to your native language.

Btw, it's not the first time you're unfriendly to me, I don't understand your hostility and weird behaviour.

 
4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vistapocalypse

Vistapocalypse

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Saxon said:

...in case you have troubles reading what I ask, I'd be more than happy to translate it to your native language.

Now you are insinuating that I cannot comprehend English, further implying that I am either (a) stupid or (b) Russian (I’m really tired of the latter insinuation). I am neither, and I understood your earlier insinuation perfectly: In your opinion, I shouldn’t be posting here at all because I am not currently running Windows Vista. For your further information, I never ran Vista x64. The broken-down Vista hardware that I used for 12 years was an x86 system. I’m thinking about refurbishing it after hearing the good news about Supermium - something I would never do merely to gain the approval of hostile accounts here at MSFN. I certainly do not blame Win32 for spending very little time at this forum! As we know, Supermium won’t make much of a splash here unless it supports Windows XP, has a portable version, an “ungoogled” version, etc. Meanwhile, people running “vanilla” Vista x86 as well as x64 are reporting success with Supermium at other forums. Have a nice day! :hello:

2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vistapocalypse

Vistapocalypse

Posted
Posted
On 3/1/2016 at 7:31 PM, WinClient5270 said:

Note: this list is for vanilla, unmodified Windows Vista/Server 2008 installations without the Extended Kernel by Win32. For the extended kernel version of this thread, go here.

Unlike earlier versions of Supermium, the now-current version based on Chromium 119 does support “vanilla, unmodified Windows Vista” and is therefore on topic in this once-great thread:

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v119

Thank You Win32! :worship:

3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 5 weeks later...
Saxon

Saxon

Posted
Posted
On 12/13/2023 at 8:16 PM, Vistapocalypse said:

Unlike earlier versions of Supermium, the now-current version based on Chromium 119 does support “vanilla, unmodified Windows Vista”

Per your advice, I tried Supermium on one of my Vista computers with plenty GBs of RAM, but it has a terrible memory leak, it's already described with a photoshoot on the link below. For example, only one process (among its many spawned processes) uses almost 8GB of RAM! And it will go higher and higher, if left opened.

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/158

RAM.png

3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vistapocalypse

Vistapocalypse

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Saxon said:

I tried Supermium on one of my Vista computers with plenty GBs of RAM, but it has a terrible memory leak, it's already described with a photoshoot on the link below. For example, only one process (among its many spawned processes) uses almost 8GB of RAM! And it will go higher and higher, if left opened.

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/158

Have you tried Supermium on your Vista x86 system? I thought “Saxon” was supposed to be a Vista x86 user’s account, but of course x86 could only utilize about 4 GB RAM, and I always ran it with “only” 3 GB, which was quite satisfactory in the old days. You are giving me no incentive to refurbish my Vista x86 system (but I cannot bring myself to take it to a recycling center either).

FWIW win32ss commented at the link you provided, “Apparently this does not happen in —no-sandbox mode.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saxon

Saxon

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Vistapocalypse said:

Have you tried Supermium on your Vista x86 system? I thought “Saxon” was supposed to be a Vista x86 user’s account, but of course x86 could only utilize about 4 GB RAM, and I always ran it with “only” 3 GB, which was quite satisfactory in the old days. You are giving me no incentive to refurbish my Vista x86 system (but I cannot bring myself to take it to a recycling center either).

FWIW win32ss commented at the link you provided, “Apparently this does not happen in —no-sandbox mode.”

Why do you quote my name? We, here in Western Europe, do have several computers per one house, just so you know. I have at least 10, of which 3 are notebooks. Is it so rare in the US? Yes, I prefer x86 systems, so what?

Running a browser with —no-sandbox makes no sense, it's against basic safety principles. 

3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...