herbalist Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 When I read your "call for support" thread, I thought that was the end of KernelEx. This is a very pleasant surprise. You just made my day and then some. Happy user keeps me motivated and more willing to put my effort!Maybe this will help with that. 359 downloads of this update already!A quick question. Regarding the problems with newer versions of FireFox, is this the same problem that affects SeaMonkey versions 2.1 and newer? This also has me wondering if the present Tor browser bundle (which contains a modified version of FireFox 8) will run on 98 now.
Windashnet Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 Thanks, I've been there first time I ever installed a Firefox on my 98SE (which is not so long time ago) and there was all kind of stuff that someone might find useful but nothing resembling what I want.The auto-login I'm talking about doesn't just store username+password in some cookie (as K-Meleon does); instead, it's an automation that opens the login page, pastes the required information and validates the login. This way, one can choose which information to use for a given site (i.e. which of my three Yahoo accounts to log into).The groups feature can save all open tabs as a group and can open any such group with a menu item click. But the real feature is that any existing auto-login link can be added to any group, so that regular pages can be opened while logging in with specific credentials to other sites.The two features working as explained above, are nowhere to be found in any other browser AFAIK. Or at least, none that would work under 9x. Anyway, let's not hijack this topic with browser discussions; I just mentioned these features in relation to the IE8 request.I believe there is a add-on for just what you are talking about.What I'm refering too is small apps that you can add to firefox these are not part of firefox by default. That's why they are called add-ons, they used to be called plugins. They are real small for the most part in the 200k or less range and add feature or modifie the way firefox works to fit the users needs and wants. Its a very powerful feature that makes firefox much better then it is by default.Here are a couple of add-on's that look like they mite do what you want, but you should look threw the add-ons to find one that's best for you.password totelastpass password manager
loblo Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 A quick question. Regarding the problems with newer versions of FireFox, is this the same problem that affects SeaMonkey versions 2.1 and newer?I am also wondering about that but for the life of me I can't find the 5 minutes it takes to download the current SeaMonkey, unpack it and test out if it does now run. (sarcasm) This also has me wondering if the present Tor browser bundle (which contains a modified version of FireFox 8) will run on 98 now.I am also wondering about that but for the life of me I can't find the 5 minutes it takes to download the current Tor browser bundle, unpack it and test out if it does now run. (re-sarcasm)They both run now btw.
Tomaso Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 avast! puts KernelEx-4.5.2.exe into the Virus Chest because of suspicious behavior..Reported as "Win32:SuspBehav-J [Heur]".A false positive of course, but I just thought I'd let you know.
DosFreak Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 IE7 or IE8 is probably never going happen on 9xI will install this new version as soon as I get home, this is exciting ^^Qemu Manager v7.0 works in 98SE/ME/NT4 (with some modifications).Using that I booted up Tiny Core Linux v4.0.2 in 98SE today and loaded up Chrome and FireFox v7.0.1.So you can probably load up a 256mb RAM XP with IE8 installed under that and just use it for web browsing.See bottom post:http://vogons.zetafleet.com/viewtopic.php?p=248386#248386
Drugwash Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 ... and that'd be as fun as scratching my head with a rake! No thanks... We're in a topic that tries to improve Win9x by adding "native" abilities where MS left off.
patclash Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 (edited) avast! puts KernelEx-4.5.2.exe into the Virus Chest because of suspicious behavior..Reported as "Win32:SuspBehav-J [Heur]".A false positive of course, but I just thought I'd let you know.Hi, same thing for me , when I try to download the file with my PC running XP I have reported it yesterday on the Avast forum :http://forum.avast.c...p?topic=88452.0 Edited November 16, 2011 by patclash
herbalist Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 I am also wondering about that but for the life of me I can't find the 5 minutes it takes to download the current SeaMonkey, unpack it and test out if it does now run.Updating Kex requires a reboot which I really don't want to do at this time. My PC is in the middle of a long term durability test of Tor as an exit node on 98, which Kex and RP9 made possible. Tempting as it is, I don't want to cut it short. All I wanted to know was if FireFox (which I don't use) and SeaMonkey were affected by the same problem.
CharlesF Posted November 16, 2011 Posted November 16, 2011 (edited) avast! puts KernelEx-4.5.2.exe into the Virus Chest because of suspicious behavior..Reported as "Win32:SuspBehav-J [Heur]".Hi, same thing for meI have reported it yesterday on the Avast forum :http://forum.avast.c...p?topic=88452.0 Interesting:A first VirusTotal scan is reported on the Avast forum, from 2011-11-15 finding 2 items:File name: KernelEx-4.5.2.exeSubmission date: 2011-11-15 15:52:24 (UTC)Result: 2 /41 (4.9%)Avast 6.0.1289.0 2011.11.15 Win32:SuspBehav-J [Heur]GData 22 2011.11.15 Win32:SuspBehav-JI have found a 2nd one from 2011-11-16 with same result:File name: KernelEx-4.5.2.exeSubmission date: 2011-11-16 17:09:30 (UTC)Result: 2 /42 (4.8%)Avast 6.0.1289.0 2011.11.16 Win32:SuspBehav-J [Heur]GData 22 2011.11.16 Win32:SuspBehav-JBut I tried a 3rd one just now, and everything is clear:File name: KernelEx-4.5.2.exeSubmission date: 2011-11-16 22:51:23 (UTC)Result: 0/ 42 (0.0%)Avast 6.0.1289.0 2011.11.16 -GData 22 2011.11.16 -Same thing on Virusscan.Jotti:Filename: KernelEx-4.5.2.exe Status: 0 out of 19 scanners reported malware.Scan taken on: Wed 16 Nov 2011 23:31:22 (CET) So, this issue may be solved . Edited November 16, 2011 by CharlesF
rainyd Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 Regarding the problems with newer versions of FireFox, is this the same problem that affects SeaMonkey versions 2.1 and newer? Most probably yes, because SeaMonkey 2.1 using the same version of Gecko engine as Firefox 4.0. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecko_(layout_engine)
M()zart Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 YES! I had hope for this! Thank you very much Xeno!For a year I hoped that KernelEx would not stall without allowing new Firefox versions to run.
togermano Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 Do U have an email so we could donate via paypal? thank u so much for ur work and making my 9x computer last a wee bit longer x
jaclaz Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 (edited) ... and that'd be as fun as scratching my head with a rake! No thanks... We're in a topic that tries to improve Win9x by adding "native" abilities where MS left off.For the record, I doubt that running IE 8 or 9 can be called an ability. Or, you know , ability as in "I have the ability to shoot my own foot"jaclaz Edited November 17, 2011 by jaclaz
Tomaso Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 I use Avast! 4.8 antivirus and it did not have any false positives with KernelEx 4.5.2 as mentioned recently. That error must occur with later versions of Avast!It's been fixed in the latest virus definitions update.Probably thanks to patclash's report.
Prozactive Posted November 17, 2011 Posted November 17, 2011 No, I downloaded it on 14 Nov before his report.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now