If your copy of Windows XP is a retail version and it is already activated on your PC, it made a list of all your hardware and serial # of Windows. If you try and install it on another PC and try to activate it, you will be denied activation.
Those XP Boot Floppies are only for people who cannot boot from their cd-rom drives. From the way BradBo's post sounds, he is able to boot from his cd-rom.
This is way to do it for those who said it doesn't happen for them. Open up task manager so that you'll be able to see the CPU usage. Then left click on the minimize/maximize portion of your browser, while you left-click, keep pressing on the mouse button and don't let go. Then you'll see the cpu usage rise.
It's actually not a problem, it's normal. I've got a P4 1.7ghz and 256rdram at 800mhz too and it happens. Even on my old Celeron the same thing would happen. The usage immediately drops anyway immediately after you release the mouse.
Hey AaronXP, the link results in a "page cannot be displayed", I don't know if it's gone or my internet connection is faulty, can you try it out? Update: I've tried to download other programs from that site, they all result in the same thing.
Just make sure that the version of Diskeeper that you're going to get is 7.0398. The earlier versions are beta. I suppose I don't have to point you where to get it? Or do I?
With NTFS and Diskeeper 7, I defrag daily. However it only takes 1 minute or less. The very first time that I defrag after a clean install, it will take 10 minutes maybe.
I'm not an MSN Messenger user but what you are asking for seems like quite a tall order. The whole point of Microsoft's new messenger is to incorporate everything with .NET.
I tried the UXtheme patch but it was so confusing to follow their instructions. I had an old copy of XP-Styles beta 1 and I tried installing it. It seems that it doesn't expire but only time will confirm this.
So what they are doing is to shorten the lips? I personally prefer them looking like Jade Hsu's. They kinda have a "warming" effect if you know what I mean! LOL! :spaced
After taking the tests at PC Pitstop with NTFS and FAT32, my test scores were much higher when my disks were formated in FAT32, suppossedly hard drives work faster in FAT32. But in reality, I couldn't feel any speed difference and I was not willing to put up with the long defrag times so I went back to NTFS once again.