Tripredacus

The notifications are a symptom of the forum upgrade. I merged your thread (and another one) into the bugs topic. http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/163472-ipb-update-july-2013-to-version-345-bugs-only/

Windows 7 Home Premium x64 has Wow (Windows on Windows) and supports 32bit binaries. If you launch an application, you can tell if it is running in 32bit mode or not by looking at Task Manager. If 32bit, under the Processes tab, the exe file will be prefixed by *32. If you have a program you want to launch in 32bit mode and Task Manager isn't helpful, you can try running it using the 32bit cmd.exe, which exists in C:\windows\syswow64.

Welcome to the MSFN!

Oh sure it can get that large. It depends on what you're putting in there. I have, for example these 64bit images: Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64, no drivers, no updates: 2.9GB Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64, Office 2010, no drivers, no updates: 5.0GB Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64, drivers, updates, no Office: 5.1GB What kind of compression are you using? I always use the FAST option.

You need to use an answer file to hide those OOBE pages.

MSSE will change it automatically, do you have that installed?

In addition to the /IPK code above, you can then run this to prompt Windows to activate: slmgr.vbs /ato

I don't need to sit on "Secret" information once MS lets it out of the bag. Windows 8.1 GA is October 17, 2013. http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/427c62dd-b90a-4bcd-b1f9-d65d6305cd77/windows-81-forum-category-rename-for-windows-81-general-availability-ga?forum=w8itproinstall

There are a couple of things to consider. First is what Edition of Windows 7 do you have? Second, which browser do you have? Some editions of Windows 7 have a security feature called AppLocker, which allows you to disable/enable the ability to use certain programs. So for example, if you had multiple browsers on a computer, you could disable all but one (or all) so that a user can only use what you want them to use. However, only Ultimate and Enterprise editions have the ability to enforce AppLocker rules: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd759131.aspx Here is how you can block all websites but one (or more) in Internet Explorer: http://www.ehow.com/how_5759058_block-except-one-internet-explorer.html

Its interesting. I just hope that it works well enough and doesn't cause any problems that can't be easily reverted.

Merged the 2 other "notification not working" topics into this one.

It looks like it has something to do with the OS on the router. Here is a collection of info that may or may not be related, but led me to that possible answer. http://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2013/papers/imc055-vanaubelA.pdf A handy OS reference: http://www.binbert.com/blog/2009/12/default-time-to-live-ttl-values/ There are a bunch of Linux tutorials on how to configure a router's TTL value, which is this (partial) command: match u8 64 This in google may lead to something more: "match u8 64" ttl "router"

I'm due for an upgrade and I would prefer Nokia's hardware, specifically the camera. But it is really app selection that stops me from moving away from Android. If Nokia had an Android product available, then I would certainly consider it. I have no problem with Windows phones in the least, but I have grown to use specific apps whose developers only made them available for Android.

Try marking it from the forum index view. Click on the orange folder icon to the left of the forum name. I've been using this and it works fine.

Which CPU do you have? ECS' website shows it only supports the E4500 CPU, not the T7500 for example. Also there is a minimum BIOS requirement for a Core 2 Duo CPU. Regarding the support, the spec says it supports the use of either DDR or DDR2, but not both at the same time. If you have any cards in the slots, remove those. Also remove all storage devices from the board (HDD, ODD, etc) and see if it will POST without those. Also you can try to boot the board without any memory installed and see if the beeps are the same.

Do you mean the password of a cached domain account that is on the local computer? Usually in a case where a domain account is the default account on a domain-joined system, you can choose to sign in as Other User and pick a local account.

I wonder if the default video out was being changed to one of the on-board ports.

I think the real problem with WinDVD 3 is the fact that Compaq was only allowed to provide the product with the system and not sell the product on its own. You may have even gotten a CD with the system with the software on it. It would explain why I can only find patches for it or trials for the actual software. There is this, which is WinDVD 4 but *may* be only an upgrade installer, meaning WinDVD 3 might be required to be installed first. ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/softpaq/sp25501-26000/SP25685.exe Also I did a bunch of reading and it seems WinDVD 3 needs a specific version or patch to run on XP and/or with certain CPUs. I looked on Ebay and there are some v3 and v4 discs out there. They aren't Compaq discs but I doubt you'd have trouble installing the Dell or Gateway one on a Compaq. Then again, I have to wonder about paying $ for old software like that...

Sound familiar? Lots more goot insights in that article, well worth reading (and it's not very long).--JorgeA Intel (as well as other board manufacturers) are running into the same problem with their desktop boards. The first problem is that there are too many of them available per generation. Every time a new generation of boards come out, I'm tasked with testing at most 10 different Intel boards to make sure everything works. TEN BOARDS. The differences between these boards are very small. Number of PCI-E Xx slots, number of memory slots, form factor. That's pretty much the differences between all the boards they sell. The other guys (Asus, MSI, etc) have the same problem. Too many options for too few customers who actually care. I know where all this comes from. A lot of it is left over from the enthusiast days, and the rest is aimed at companies who build devices. Except those products should be kept away from the retail channel if that is the case. If at every new generation a single manufacturer only released 3 boards based on form factor, it would be better. Intel (and others) wouldn't need to spend all that time doing R&D on making a bunch of different things that do the same thing. The second problem is that Intel has been changing CPU keying in each of the past few generations. I've got a few different gens available to me that I have to re-test for various reasons. While all the CPUs look the same (and are the same size) they have 3 different keyings, meaning you can't actually put that CPU in the socket even if it is an LGA115X. This means that you have physical incompatibility issues between generations. And the last problem is that these different generations (Intel 6/7/8 series chipsets) are coming out too close together. I worked on the 7 series and maybe had 4 months off before the Haswell (8 series) stuff came out. And in the end, very few people actually care about the difference between the different generations of boards. Even AMD can fall into this category. Desktop boards have been pretty much the same (in a working sense) since the Core 2 Quad CPUs came out, which I think was in the Q35 and 5x chipsets for Intel. Sure the i Series CPUs are technically better, but engineers, gamers and other high-end users are the only ones who care about things like that. To me, there is no difference between this gaggle of boards that came out the past 2 or 3 years and a standard user can get by using something a few generations old still with no issue.

The file in that readme is for this: ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/softpaq/sp22001-22500/sp22141.exe Which even according to the text file you posted is for version 2. Here's the file list I found the link to that exe from: ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/softpaq/allfiles.txt

You can't find Out of Bounds on Ebay, but only on Ebay UK. On there only 1 copy of the movie sold and it is the "2003" version and for less than the used price. I want to say that maybe Amazon has the pictures flipped, since no copies of the one with the house in the picture were there.

I think the new forum version uses AJAX for posting topics and replies. Sometimes that "posting" thing that shows up at the top after pressing the Post button takes longer than usual. But I've seen this happen on other IPBs running the version and I don't think the site is the problem.