Tripredacus

My experience with XPx64 is limited, but I wonder if there is a wow6432Node section of the registry like in 7x64 OS? If there is, maybe that registry key would work there. I do not know about POSReady 2009, but POSReady7 is available in 64bit.

Your ISO? As in you were the one who created this warez? Boot.wim is not redistributable.

Gateway had tried to sell a PC with a 50" monitor. I recall seeing it on demo at a computer show (where did those go?) with a BSOD on it. The entire product line, the Gateway Destination, came with various sized monitors, 27", 36" etc. They didn't take off because they were substantially more expensive than the typical desktop PC of the time. It was marketed as a home theater solution! http://news.cnet.com/Gateway-debuts-1,999-PC-TV/2100-1001_3-214896.html I can't find any information on the 50" model I saw at that show. They may have never gone to market with it. I'm also not certain if it was a CRT or a RPTV. I don't think it was a flat panel. Here are some other mentions of large-size displays from 1999: http://www.eschoolnews.com/1999/10/01/projectors-presentation-equipment/ So they were definately around, but you probably weren't wanting to spend thousands of dollars on them!

Yes this is how it functions, however almost every time a user requests an account deletion they mean for the posts to be removed too. This is what Xper refers to. It is a curious topic only because deleting an account is like a menial task for the administrator. The logical response would be to just not log into the site anymore and delete your cookies. So the user request is "please change all my posts to say guest_username instead of username." The user still would not come to the site and login anyways, isn't it the same thing except the admin has to press a couple of buttons? Anyways, I think that some people think that deleting an account will delete the posts. It has certainly come up before!

Actually, there is a problem with the CK Editor (The plug-in that comprises the reply box). In the IFRAME source it has a DOCTYPE, html, head and body objects. That is a major error in programming an include! It may be possible that the existance of these lines are causing you a problem. I have found errors in Google's javascript as well as CKEditor's CSS files. I have a similar problem on other websites that use an include/iframe object that contains a DOCTYPE declaration. That portion of the site does not render. BUT I do NOT have this problem on MSFN. So it isn't a 100% surefire bet that a malformed webpage is going to fail to render properly. So any one of these errors could cause an issue with some browser/plug-in combination. EDIT: URLS (Domains) that CK Editor uses: ajax.googleapis.com apis.google.com

I wonder if you have some sort of privacy filter enabled or installed that is causing the reporting issue. It may also be why portions of the site do not work. What about that Norton toolbar?

It may be possible to locate your old account by using the email you used to use. Also you will need to remove the link in your signature as we do not permit advertising. If, after you are contributing to the community, you want to show off your website, you can post about it here: http://www.msfn.org/board/forum/4-websites-and-boards/

Having worked for an ISP before, I can tell you that anyone at Google who has the ability to log into the mail server or mail exchangers, can read any email they want.

That EULA is for POSReady 2009, however WES 2009 has the same limitations in its EULA.

That's a normal behaviour. I use the text mode always unless I want to add a smiley. I too notice that the hard returns get nerfed when switching between modes. Also another thing I notice in your new screenshot... The quick-reply box is there as it is showing your name as "photo" but it is not rendering. But the accounting doesn't seem to see you as being present. Even if you were logged in as anon, it would show you as JorgeA and 1 anon or 1 member. But your pic shows only 2 guests. Make sure you are not blocking this URL: ajax.googleapis.com It is required in order for the reply box to work properly. For example, if I block that URL, the quick reply ceases to function.

I use it. There are some functional differences between an Embedded OS and a desktop one, but your question of "will it work with my programs" cannot be answered by us. That is why I said for you to try it out yourself to see if it suits your needs. We can't guess what your programs are and how they operate. I do know that some programs do not operate as expected based on feedback received from ISVs.

2 things. First, in your FF28 mode where you can't type (I'm using FF28 as well) it looks like you can still click the first button on the toolbar. This changes the editor mode to text only instead of wysiwyg mode. Try hitting that and see if you can type. Second, in both of your screenshots, the URL seems wrong. If you were replying to a topic, the URL wouldn't be board/index, but it would show topic/number-topic-title. For example, replying to this topic I have the following in my address bar: One last thing, does the quick reply box also not work?

Oh yeah, I forgot about Blaster, that was for a month or two. No way could you put a naked PC online, it would get infected right away. It was definately a pain during deployment, so many machines would get infected in that short period of time between when the NIC got an IP and the firewall software got installed.

Have you ever had to take a tech support call from someone with absolutely no grasp on how computers work or the terminology? Have you ever heard those stories of a rep telling a caller to close a window and they go and close an actual window in their house? The following image reminds me of talking to those types of people and how their strange world might work.

I have certainly seen PCs just become infected off the bat if connected to the internet with no AV or firewall. It is always due to special circumstances, such as in the early stages of a virus outbreak. The last time I've specifically seem this occur was during the first week of Conficker/Downadup before any patches were released.

Welcome to the MSFN!

I think it is more that MS had brought that message to the wrong audience. People at E3 are looking for consoles and video games, not those other features the XBox One and the PS4 have. A similar *yawn* occurred during Sony's conference this year (which was boring anyways) when they brought up their Playstation TV product. They should have been selling those products (or those features) at more relevant conferences like CES.

A good example, a 5 year old, visiting my house over the weekend for a get together, apparently had never seen a CRT computer monitor before. :\

Welcome to the MSFN!

More: http://walyou.com/worldwide-places-hit-by-the-blue-screen-of-death/

I would test out the applications on the Eval version first: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=14947

I primarily run all my wmic commands in a .cmd. You can try this, I didn't test it out, just edited for syntax highlighting. RunWait (@ComSpec & " /c wmic useraccount where " & Chr(34) & "name='username'" & Chr(34) & " set passwordchangeable=false")

Use wmic wmic useraccount where "name='username'" set passwordchangeable=false

I would have mentioned that, since I did see that WDFcoinstaller does exist in the driver package. However, installing KMDF package is NOT required in a Windows 7 OS for the MEI driver to work. The only time I've had to add that support package (or UDMF) is if I inject a driver that has a WDFcoinstaller and the result is that the OS bugchecks at boot. It is possible it would only do this for boot-critical drivers, which may be why MEI doesn't cause a bugcheck. (I do not know if MEI driver is boot-critical. Just a guess.) Since the OP had not mentioned bugcheck issues after adding the driver, I didn't mention it.