Jump to content

Dave-H

Super Moderator
  • Posts

    5,403
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    68
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United Kingdom

Everything posted by Dave-H

  1. AFAIK the device IDs come from the devices themselves, and cannot be changed. I'll be interested to hear if my driver works for you. It's a long shot, but you never know! You can add your device IDs to the INF file(s) of the driver, which may (or may not) get it to work with devices it wasn't actually intended for.
  2. Here's ProxHTTPSProxyMII v1.5 Rev3e if anyone wants it. Credit to @heinoganda of course. Prox HTTPS Proxy MII v1.5 Rev3e Python 3.44 Original Files.7z
  3. You're certainly right in saying that just because there's no AHCI switch in the BIOS doesn't mean that it isn't supported. My BIOS doesn't have a switch either. My driver is using atapi.sys. Whether my driver will work for you I cannot say of course, but here it is if you want to try it. Intel SATA AHCI Rapid Storage 10.1.0.1008.exe
  4. I don't think you can do that just in the registry, you need an AHCI driver for the SATA controller apart from anything else! If there is no option to enable AHCI in the BIOS, it could well be that it's not fundamentally capable of supporting it. There may be an updated version of the BIOS which does of course, if the hardware is capable.
  5. Which proxy program are you using, "ProxHTTPSProxy" or "HTTPSProxy"? The latter is a development of the former as far as I know, but they have very different control systems.
  6. Thanks for the heads up!
  7. Do you actually mean "can't install" or just "can't use"? Having a low powered computer shouldn't stop you installing IE8, or anything else, although obviously performance might well be poor. As you will presumably only be using IE8 to access Windows Update or Microsoft Update, does this matter? Surely you wouldn't use it for normal web use anyway, as most websites no longer work with it!
  8. "Last" would imply that there will never be any subsequent version of the software which will still run on XP, which is not always going to be the case of course. I think "latest" is the best term to use, as it is now, even though the interpretation of "latest" can vary of course.
  9. OK, I did my tests, with resounding success! As I thought, uninstalling KB4501226 did not produce a result, as it's no longer actually offered to POSReady 2009 systems. Uninstalling its predecessor, KB4487990 produced the desired result though, as you can see above. So, It's all working!
  10. Thank you so much for all that work! I'm sure this will be very useful to others in the future. The use of ProxHTTPSProxyMII when it was first ported to XP by @heinoganda, and now HTTPSProxy with its much improved control system, fixed a huge number of internet access incompatibilities for me in XP. I would heartily recommend to all XP users to use one or the other of them now as a matter of course!
  11. The "cannot connect" error message was back in my System Event Log this morning. I did have some connection problems earlier on though, so that could have caused it, I'll wait to see if it happens again tomorrow. If it doesn't reoccur, I will try the update uninstall test then.
  12. No sign of the yellow shield after unhiding one of my hidden hardware updates, but I guess that's because it's an optional update. What I think I'll do now to test it is to uninstall the latest time zones update, as that will do no damage if there's a problem. The last one for POSReady2009 was KB4501226, on 11/06/19. That was widely considered to have been a mistake by Microsoft though, as support had ended, and it's not now available in the catalogue. I have got its installation file, but I suspect that if I remove it, it won't appear as an update as it's effectively been withdrawn for POSReady2009. The previous one was KB4487990, issued on 10/04/19. I will try removing that, and see if Automatic Updates prompts me to reinstall it.
  13. Well my system is already set up exactly as yours is now, and has been for some time, that is to say with Automatic Updates set to "notify" mode. Presumably it was its checks which were generating the Event Log error messages, which seem to have now stopped, although I'll need another couple of days to confirm that. Does that mean that it's now working? As you say, I guess the only way to know for sure is to artificially trigger a missing update. I do have some hidden hardware updates, I could just try unhiding one of those I guess.
  14. OK, I'll give that a try and report back. Since ticking "Automatically Detect Settings" in my Internet LAN settings I've not seen the Event Log error message, so that may well have fixed that. I'll have to leave it a few more days to be sure though, the messages were appearing every 24 hours.
  15. Yes, I could do that, but I don't really want to risk it just for a speculative test! I have "Startup Delayer" installed and running for other reasons, so I could delay the service start with that. There's no native way of doing it in XP AFAIK. Thanks, that's very helpful and makes perfect sense. You say your Automatic Updates Control Panel applet doesn't work? Is it all greyed out, or does it not open at all?
  16. wuauclt /detectnow appears to do nothing, and there's no event in the Event Viewer. I guess that means it's not working! It doesn't generate the error message either. I'll try changing the LAN settings. Obviously i'm not expecting the shield to pop up in the system tray again anytime soon, but it would be interesting to see if it's possible to get the automatic checks working again.
  17. Thanks, but I was thinking more of whether @maile3241is getting the error messages, as they seem to already have automatic updates enabled. I'm not sure how it could show the yellow shield if it can't connect.
  18. Well I do have HTTPSProxy running all the time, as I need it to display my e-mails properly in Eudora. So you're not getting the Event Log error messages?
  19. I'm still seeing this in my System Event Log regularly. I still have automatic updates set to tell me if there are any! I guess this is because it can't use the proxy.
  20. I think @xpandvistafanwas saying that they had already installed SP2 (for Office 2010) and it was the post SP2 updates that were taking a long time. I do remember that there was an awful lot of them!
  21. It used to be like that a few years ago, on my low powered netbook I would leave it scanning overnight, and sometimes it hadn't even found the updates then! IIRC it was something to do with too many previous Internet Explorer updates clogging the system (or something like that). At least you did eventually get the updates, and I do remember them taking a while when I first installed and updated Office 2010, so I don't think this is unusual. You just have to be patient and be glad you only have to do it once! It's probably still quicker than identifying all the updates and then downloading them from the catalogue and installing them all manually!
  22. No I haven't excluded HTTPSProxy (I'm no longer using ProxHTTPSProxy) from Malwarebytes. I will give that a try, just excluding the HTTPSProxy folder.
  23. Thanks largely to you! I do get full speed using Firefox 52.9 ESR, which doesn't use the proxy. There is no difference if I switch off Malwarebytes' web scanning. The speed hit is only noticeable if I use 360Chrome with the "Use IE proxy" option enabled. Fortunately you can easily switch it off. This does result in a few padlocks not being green in the address bar, but I've not found any site yet which doesn't work in that configuration.
  24. Just for completeness, now working fine in 360Chrome 13.5.
×
×
  • Create New...