At this point you should stop asking people if they read the thread. Honestly, out of the blue statements and derailing totally off topic. I said it first but I still back you up. As also stated by Zxian and by the OP (read the thread ?) the computer we are talking about is more than acceptable on the hardware level. People talk about their experience "from the times of Win3.11"... have you ever ran a properly installed XP on a PIII 800 with 256 RAM, sent mails or surf the internet with it ? Exactly, no problemo. So say "fairly under-powered computer" for this 1.2GHz-512, not at all. I'm sure Black Viper knows an awfull lot about services, but I'm also sure he formats his PC at least 10 times a year. This is not what the OP is planning to do. This computer needs to be properly reinstalled, in a few hours, not 12-14, have a drink with the family up North. And maybe come back in 4 years and do it again. Microsoft makes Windows XP the best they can to 1) make it look good so it sells (that's the unneeded bit for not so "hard core tweakers") 2) make it work out of the box for 99.99 % of buyers, this implies unneeded components, but does not translate in "making a bad product". And it sure doesn't mean anyone replying here knows "the" uncle best than Bill Gates knows the uncle. None of us knows the uncle, only the OP, but maybe MS has a little understanding of their users and of their product. I'm going off topic as well. I wonder why this thread is turning almost emotional for some posters. I'll stop here.