RJARRRPCGP

This is a known issue with Internet Explorer 6 under Windows XP without service packs.

"IRQL NOT LESS THAN OR EQUAL" doesn't sound like a video card problem. It sounds like a CPU or motherboard overheat. "IRQL NOT LESS THAN OR EQUAL" usually is a system unit error. This looks alot like an overheating CPU and motherboard bus overclock. I would check the system temps in the BIOS! Sapphire needs to be shot, 95C is CRITICAL! You probably would already be getting errors before that!

Buzz! You can't do that, MS-DOS 6x don't even support FAT32! It supports FAT16 only!

Sounds like a bad sector, but more likely a "soft bad" sector. A "soft bad" sector isn't a true bad sector, according to one of the folks at HDDGuru, it's a sector with corrupted ECC information. To get rid of a "soft bad" sector, just wipe the HDD with zeroes.

I never heard of a 4 KB cluster limit with Windows XP. With Windows 2000, you can't defrag NTFS partitions with clusters bigger than 4 KB. That limit don't exist with Windows XP.

When someone was installing The Sims 2, (or the first version) on their PC, I saw "access denied" appear when the installer was doing it's job, during the file copying process. But, I didn't even touch the account settings! Is the installer known to be broken. Did Electronic Arts F-up?

Feels as if Windows went to PIO mode. It don't even give me a percent indicator. This just means that I must leave it for possibly 12 hours or more!

Why does Rootkit Revealer seem to freeze or take forever? I tested it before and I had to stop it, because I saw nothing but the HDD LED being lit.

That don't make sense, because what does that even have to do with the HAL?

Isn't a GeForce 4 Ti 4600 just a higher clocked GeForce 4 Ti? Kind of like GTX vs. GTS?

Even with a 40-conductor IDE cable, it should be at least in UDMA 2. (UDMA 33) An 80-conductor IDE cable is only required for UDMA 4 (UDMA 66) and higher.

Sounds like voltage issues or a bad component. If you're overclocking, it's a bad overclock.

Folks, please wait for at least JKDefrag 3.25 to be released! JKDefrag 3.24 appears to be broken, even with the default options, it appeared to have moved all files that it can to the end of the HDD! I didn't have that problem with an earlier version. Also, it appears that with the sorting defrag methods, it could loop or take way longer than normal!

Darn! I wished that was the case with a Radeon 9800 Pro that I gotten for only around $25!

I agree. Are you sure? Does it look like a bunch of squares and/or letters with random colours on the BIOS and DOS screen? That sounds just like the Radeon 9800 Pro that I gotten back in late April.

I dunno, because according to Microsoft, this only occurs if you're using Windows 2000 without a service pack.

Sounds just like O&O Defrag V6. With O&O Defrag V6, to do a full defrag, you're required to run it as a job.

The problem is gone now.

You aren't supposed to put win.com into autoexec.bat with Windows 95 and later! Windows is already launched by another method.

That's probably because the motherboard is from 1997 or older.

this isnt an os problem it is a bios problem, llxx found out this ages ago thats why theres a 48bitlba patch for 95 According to Microsoft, Windows 95 has a 32 GB limit!

Did you check with 7-Zip? It should say "dxnt.cab is not supported archive".

I agree.

Sounds like the BIOS settings for the onboard ethernet.

Bad Link! The message board gives an error message about missing files!