Jump to content

Karla Sleutel

Member
  • Posts

    332
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by Karla Sleutel

  1. Agree, it's very bright, for blind. older people?
  2. Windows 11 Security claims it detected: Trojan:Win32/Bearfoos.A!ml "Details: This programme is dangerous and executes commands from an attacker." Someone explain pls, do I have to worry? How do they know it's driven by an attacker? It means it detected connections from the outer world? I'm scared... https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1399
  3. So, Insta, Twitch and Tik Tok now finally work? Not clear.
  4. Thanks, I tried that, but as I understood, it works a bit better with the acceleration completely off.
  5. I have a very old, 12 years old GPU - GTX780Ti, please don't tell it's too old, I know. Nevertheless, it's still a High End GP and supports all the way up tp Direct X11. Yet the video playback with Supermium is dead for me. I can't even start to describe the choppiness. Certainly works fine with other Chromes, no wonder. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1385
  6. @D.Draker wrote ClamWin still works and without the need for any addons. Not sure how big is the company behind ClamWin. https://clamwin.com/
  7. LOL, Dolby is the minimalistic audio, a very outdated tech., it was never supposed to become an "audiophile audio", it's highly compressed and very suitable for streaming via Chrome to avoid stutters! Editing. Very important for poor people with slow internet, outdated garbage CPU, to minimise spikes also.
  8. For poor people, or in developing countries, maybe. My father had Dolby CDs (digital form, not "theatre"!) in 1990 or even earlier. https://www.quadraphonicquad.com/forums/threads/proarte-dolby-surround-cds-from-1990-91.5043/ And Laser Discs with Dolby Surround (video) in 1990-91, also. I wasn't even born yet. https://www.lddb.com/laserdisc/00140/PILF-2187/Terminator-2:-Judgment-Day-(1991) Still not incorporating Dolby and DTS to Chrome in the era of streaming has no excuse!!!
  9. People write, Dolby works only in Edge. If it's true, we may safely consider all Chromes, not only this, retardedly outdated, it's a terrible shame to still not implement a technology from 1991. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/10961
  10. For those living somewhere with a governmental ban on Kaspersky (US, for example), using such methods to circumvent restrictions is illegal and might have dire consequences. I guess, teaching people how to do it, too.
  11. There's no such update in MS catalogue. Are you sure??? https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx?q=KB2653312 Not off-topic, we all are very interested in the sound quality if Windows 11, but no one posted, so we can't (as of yet) determine whether it added up or contributed to the claimed (alleged) failure. I'm also an owner of a very good card (shown at my profile, first post I think). But the description and my impressions were deleted by the supervisor.
  12. I completely agree with D.Darker about the poor style of Musk's clothes. But it seems it's very common for those with money. No taste at all. But he could care less about hiding his salaries from French prosecutors at this point, I think something more serious needs to happen to somehow knock him out. Sorry for the off-topic addition. D.Draker is right about .sig files. By this time, I already have no doubts in what he writes. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1323#issuecomment-2797469987
  13. Usually, if someone has 7z or similar on their PC, they already got it configured with the settings of their preferred choosing, I find it strange why all of a sudden that person would just use a fully uncompressed method, all after a year with Ultra as its default.
  14. So far, no matter how many browsers I tried, only CatsXP has them partially disabled, it just sends empty strings, just like in @Dixel's hack, but the API works, Possibly Brave, too. @NotHereToPlayGames, you mentioned you use brave 134, could you check? Thanks
  15. Wasn't Haswell (2013) not supposed to work with 7? And what is the purpose of AVX being integrated in Chrome?
  16. Good browser, version 137 for legacy OS released, leaving Thorium 15 versions behind. https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/137.0.7106.1
  17. Do you work at NASA, FBI, NSA, CIA? then I see no reason to hold off your screenbcaps, the one you just showed, is from a very old hardware, not to mention very cheap initially. As for Supermium, it's not its fault, your card doesn't support most codecs surrounding us since 2012 anyways. H264 developed a quarter of century ago would be the maximum, but it's not widely used these days.
  18. Thanks! 12 is what your OS has, the one in the brackets is what your hardware can theoretically do. But as I suspected, the card is an odd, cheap OEM, the name is odd, probably Chrome simply doesn't know what to do with it! And then again, it's very, very old.
  19. It's not true, your processor is at least 12 years old. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/75122/intel-core-i74770-processor-8m-cache-up-to-3-90-ghz/specifications.html
  20. Please be calm, we all are friends here, Don't you read what I write? DXDIAG shows only what OS is capable of, NOT your hardware. For your hardware, you need to take a sccreencap from GPUZ. (Videocard)
  21. How do you know that? DXDIAG shows what OS is capable of.
  22. This happens because the browser simply can't get a hold of D3D11 hardware feature {no direct bypass happens} due to the fact of using the obsolete, Windows 2000 Era DX8{9} GPU, or it's simply very cheap (OEM) version or the such. So the browser emulates DX11 in soft mode, and the load distributed to the CPU, resulting in the enormous cache. Clear?
  23. He said Vista and up. Not only Vista. That includes all OS starting with Vista (NT6.0) and Win10/11 Dave H. uses. They all support DX11, the question is, would your card be capable of DX11, most likeky no, considering the fact you wrote about your hardware.
  24. @D.Draker already asked @win32 to remove the unnecessary disk killing "feature", it was several years ago, when the project was only starting. https://msfn.org/board/topic/184046-future-of-chrome-on-windows-7/page/38/#findComment-1245198
×
×
  • Create New...