Jump to content

D.Draker

Member
  • Posts

    3,846
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    171
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    France

Everything posted by D.Draker

  1. Many thanks! I'll check it out and get back to you! In contrast to those other *allegedly* English speaking members, you understood what I want very well!
  2. Are you familiar with the term "Unexpire" certain version flags?
  3. This is all very interesting, but I explicitly declared, I only need this browser for 7 WITHOUT the Telemetry tracking Stuff Pack 1 (SP1).
  4. Thank you very much, dear @AstroSkipper, unfortunately, I lost interest as soon as I saw the usual increase in brightness/contrast. I don't understand why those folks, win32ss and Alexander, keep pushing it up and up.
  5. Friend, what is it you not understand, ask me. I gave you an example, somewhere in 123(?), they started to force WebGPU Flag to "always on", but in earlier versions it was OFF, I don't remember exactly when it happened, that's why I asked, I'm very sorry you're again moody today, in the meantime, you're very welcome to seek advice from @D.Draker on how to be calm and chill, relaxed, friendly, joyful.
  6. Oh, I just noticed, as usual with those blind brightness die-hards, the contrast is AGAIN increased!!! GEEEEZZZ!!!!! "Text contrast increased "
  7. The author released a half year old version, claiming it "isn't going to turn your computer into some sort of virus magnet"... The description is big and confusing, does it work on Vista? No clear mentions. https://github.com/Alex313031/thorium/releases/tag/M130.0.6723.174
  8. But your heart is already with me, it's all what is needed now, all else in due time! I've been patient with Supermium for several years, the result we all know, it went astray. I want this browser to succeed, so you all post you want it to run it on Windows 7 without SP and any other updates, which would also work on Vista, like v136. EDIT. I forgot you're in the hiding mode on github (only there?).
  9. There's an over a year difference between those two. Flags do change in Chrome, depending on the version and the desire of the developers, its' all public knowledge.
  10. It'd be important to tell which combination of flags was used. Many testing sites can simply lower the scores if some crap like web-GPU is disabled.
  11. Thank you, the older Ungoofed version 134 (from January or December?) was released today. But it demands KB3080149 for Windows 7 and SP1, those updates make the overly bright Win7 even brighter, the browser also won't work on Vista, unlike the v136. https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/ungoogled-chromium_134.0.6998.165
  12. D.Draker writes this browser is good, what do you do? Right! You follow D.Draker like a magnet. D.Draker is kind, fair and forgiving. I forgive you, no report will follow your utterly rude post. You follow my every step, and I understand you very well, I'm an interesting man. I've been told many times, I'm a natural born leader, people listen and follow D.Draker, so stop fighting your temptations and accept the fate.
  13. I'll ignore, but quote to make the admins see what you do before you re-edit your post because you simply put words in my mouth. Where did I say XP is not secure? Or Vista? It's a rhetorical question. Do the have this word in your language? And telling, "when the "Guest" (banned account?) wrote numerous posts about "vulnerabilities", it was OK for you, but when D.Draker started, no" - is NOT a "fight", it's a fact.
  14. Biased? So, when the "Guest" wrote numerous posts about vulnerabilities, it was OK, when D.Draker started, no? This is what biased is, not the one you say. Google » Chrome » 122 Vulnerabilities: 238 https://www.cvedetails.com/version/1878250/Google-Chrome-122.0.6261.128.html
  15. You're expected to be mature on the forum ans stick to the subject. Thanks.
  16. Your VRAM is faster than the one @NotHereToPlayGames has, so thanks for the confirmation. Your VRAM is faster by 5.3GB/s, also its size is 30 percent bigger. Your GPU clock is faster by 35 percent. No wonder Supermium runs OK.
  17. It's odd they forced you to upgrade to the latest OS. at the same time allowing to run a severely outdated browser with one million of vulnerabilities, 14 major versions below the current one. Over a year old, almost 1.5 years old.
  18. It's only for convenience, no one expects you to share my beliefs.
  19. Recently, there was an almost unique case - you asked a legit, on topic question about streaming on Supermium, I answered why it's not possible, and even if Supermium buys a 10K digital key, your hardware will never get through, I also explained why - very politely, if you're insulted with the fact of having such a hardware, it's not my problem. And I honestly can't comprehend why it gets you so deep. I run a 10 years old Videocard with the initial price of 1200Euro, I feel no shame in it. I don't upgrade because newer don't have Vista drivers. What are your reasons to stay on such oldies, we don't know - Win10 has all the drivers. BTW, be careful with curses, you never know whom you wished them to. I'm a Black magic practitioner, I do séances, read books on the occult, etc.
  20. You had been explained last week. Re-read why. Or like the folks here suggested, follow me to stay tuned and nothing like this will ever happen again. You don't want "updates", why should I? https://msfn.org/board/topic/186741-firefox-and-chromium-running-on-windows-7-by-e3kskskoy7wqk/page/2/#findComment-1278895
  21. Thank you very much, could you then ask if he makes an Ungoofed version for Windows 7 without SP or any other updates, which would also work on Vista, like v136.
  22. I'm no longer surprised why you had terrible stuck-ups with the modern Supermium, whereas other members didn't! GPU with DDR3 is 2003 tech, I had a GPU with DDR3 in 200 or so, over 20 years ago. Your computer OEM simply used very cheap VRAM. At that time, GPU already had GDDR5.
  23. Yes, and it's so snappy! Also, NO memory leak like was observed in the ported browser by the allegedly super-duper Russian "hacker" Balunovitch. This could be of interest to @mjd79
  24. Yes, Also. Some browsers require --disable-encryption-win , not just --disable-encryption.
  25. Oh, and that alleged Dell 2407, or the "newest" of yours (less than 12 years old) display will never get through with the streaming on Supermium because it lacks HDCP 2.2.
×
×
  • Create New...