D.Draker

Thank you!

347.88 last stable driver for GT610 (also kepler, just like GT 710) https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/forums/game-ready-drivers/13/214437/34788-last-stable-driver-for-gt610/

Was the location tag off?

I don't rely on "user allowed" settings as they come back to default each time when a new profile is made, so I use it via cmd --disable-quic , without quotes of course.

Thank you for your honest opinion! I'm outta likes for today, unfortunately, that's why I write this in plain words. Glad to be of help, that's the reason I made this topic. It would still be helpful if you voted.

Don't agree? You're very welcome to vote for No.1 or whatever you like.

Please specify, where do you see "hostility" from my side? In that article, provided by the actually hostile member, which I merely quoted, the developer himself points out to severe flaws, and I only quoted one. Besides, I made the topic about Google's QUIC implementation, which is clearly shown in the title, not Forefox. Strange you both still didn't read the title.

This topic is about Google's QUIC implementation, which is clearly shown in the title, yet it obviously doesn't prevent you from posting off-topic and insulting, all as usual with your posts.

No matter your mood, you're demanded to be respectful on the forum. https://msfn.org/board/guidelines/ And stop insulting once in a while. 7.b This community is built upon mutual respect. You are not allowed to flame other members. People who do not respect personal opinions and/or personal work will be warned in first instance. If you ignore the warning and keep on flaming, you will be banned without notice. You ignored that rule 75389623702702037 times. Good, less dangerous advice. Don't like my topics? Ignore.

Are you sure you read that article yourself? Doesn't look like it. "21.5.5. Request Forgery with Version Negotiation "Clients that are able to present a spoofed source address on a packet can cause a server to send a Version Negotiation packet (Section 17.2.1) to that address. The absence of size restrictions on the connection ID fields for packets of an unknown version increases the amount of data that the client controls from the resulting datagram. The first byte of this packet is not under client control and the next four bytes are zero, but the client is able to control up to 512 bytes starting from the fifth byte. No specific countermeasures are provided for this attack, though generic protections (Section 21.5.6) could apply. In this case, ingress filtering [BCP38] is also effective." https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9000/

And MSFN is absolutely right! https://msfn.org/board/topic/186094-google-quic-is-vulnerable-to-cyber-criminal-activity-creates-a-‘black-hole’-that-hackers-can-exploit/

"While touted as an alternative to TCP, QUIC poses several security concerns for network operators. Standard network security appliances cannot easily identify QUIC traffic, which makes this network protocol vulnerable to cyber criminal activity." "Why do Network Security Teams Not Like Google QUIC? Despite its perceived positives, QUIC could inadvertently have a negative impact on network security. That’s because security appliances like firewalls and network sensors typically are not able to access information they had previously relied on with legacy TCP sessions. This creates a ‘black hole’ that hackers can exploit. Here’s the main problem: Standard network security devices can’t determine the QUIC application protocol, viewing it like layer 4 UDP traffic. While browsers and supported web servers can differentiate between QUIC traffic and other traffic, standard network security like firewalls can’t. This means firewalls are less effective at detecting incoming threats, putting network security at risk. To complicate the challenge for cyber threat hunters, Google revises its protocol frequently, and threat detection tools must catch up with these ever-changing standards. There are other issues. QUIC, similar to TLS 1.3, applies its encryption at the transport layer and not in the higher layers. Hence, it encrypts all transport information, which can virtually eliminate the attack surface that TCP offers. Plus, it’s increasingly difficult to measure and analyze QUIC traffic using reporting tools because, again, firewalls and standard network sensors don’t recognize it.  This is a plus for consumer privacy but causes significant challenges for those responsible for protecting our communications networks." source. https://netquestcorp.com/google-quic-and-network-security/

Disable at startup.

Nothing surprising, newer laptops are thinner, nowhere to place a somewhat decent cooler. With that technology level, it should be 25 degrees at max! My Kaby runs idle at 23 and load at 50 max. And those desktop CPUs are known to run hotter. All that with the supplied thin cooler!

BTW, the CPU is indeed not impressive! Only 29% faster than the cheap 2013 Haswell Pentium. The Haswell era didn't have that bloated OS at that time, so no surprise at all. https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Pentium-G3470-vs-Intel-Core-i5-1335U/m28614vsm2065642

Those newer gens have Intel "software guard", turn that off, also. From what I know, some software makers use it to fingerprint your PC for "licensing" purposes.

I had some weird cases of slowness on Haswell, it was related to HPET, basically try to turn off everything you don't need in the BIOS. Sometimes even turning off virtualisation helps. I think it's more poor mobo design related rather than CPU.

Silverfall 2006, the famous one, made in France! Available in English, too, runs on GT710 fine, uses Physx.

Whom exactly do you call "inhospitable"? I don't think @Dave-H and @Tripredacus would agree with such labelling of MSFN, I'm asking you [very politely] for the 3579692369239298 time, please don't try to ignite hostilities over and over again. Everyone here is having a nice chat. Quoting your off-topic attack in full, just in case.

I asked the director of our big PC store about the sales, he said: "it's the same, basically". People still buy lots of PCs with the OS already preinstalled, esp. laptops. German Fujitsu Notebook LIFEBOOK U7613, their ultra-light LIFEBOOK U9413, LIFEBOOK U9313X (ultra-light, silver-white convertible) are very popular here, they come Windows 11 Pro already installed.

Oh, sorry, indeed, how could I?!

It was a joke. Clearly, the title is misspelled, not to mention the overall misleading, clickbait style name of the topic and improper, poor English grammar. No articles to support that "theory", nothing.

Did you try this website? A huge drivers collection. https://driverscollection.com/

It's the latest "gaming trend". They reissue old games with artificially bumped up reqs. Probably deserves a dedicated topic on how to deal with it. I don't know how many gamers we have here,

Do you know how to fight a smartphone that turns on by itself? Added: Most frequently when it's on charge.