Jump to content

Dixel

Member
  • Posts

    1,801
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    115
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Netherlands

Everything posted by Dixel

  1. CD is only 16bit, properly backed up Vinyl is 24bit, I can hear a clear difference in favour of Vinyl. I have a good turntable made by Philips, I simply back them up to spare the vinyls.
  2. Wo Long: Fallen Dynasty v1.300 Genres: Action, Slasher, made by Companies: Team Ninja, Koei Tecmo Games Requires Windows 10 as the minimum, the main reason being DirectX Version 12.
  3. No, only Vinyl! On CD it's highly compressed and sounds awful, you need Vinyl.
  4. I like the squares more. More pleasant to the eyes.
  5. Well, then it's not portable. Ungoogled is fully portable by using only the two flags, everything is saved, and no need to complicate life with any third party tools.
  6. I thought using hacked(modded) XP ISO versions was banned here, and even discussing it, especially posting screenshots.
  7. I hope you don't mind me replying to this. Not sure about the industrial espionage, but stealing data from private users and later selling it to advertisers is a very well known and documented issue. I've never used that browser. Google says that user (you're referring to) is native Russian, not Ukrainian, if it helps you. (determined by the errors he makes in English) Could you please elaborate about the lights flashing? I was under the impression this was only Chrome related.
  8. It doesn't even properly work on Vista, not to mention windows XP. Confirmed by the developer. https://github.com/weolar/xpchrome/issues/19#issuecomment-1826280259
  9. People say it doesn't. "chromium 115 for xp 20231121 does not work" https://github.com/weolar/xpchrome/issues/26
  10. Please define "completely". So you want to say you can copy the supermium folder with your existing profile to another PC, and it keeps all your settings, passwords, extensions, cookies, etc? I'd like to see the proof of that. Thanks.
  11. That's why I still didn't write my own portable starter programme for that browser. One of the reasons.
  12. 8GB of RAM, Pentium G as the minimum or the second gen of Intel i-Core, preferably a graphics card with 2GB of GDDR5, fast HDD..
  13. Dixel

    TRIM for XP

    Overall, I agree with you, still with an SSD XP will be even more responsive, if properly configured. Win7 does way too many reads-writes, especially at startup, also agree.
  14. Again, please stop with getting personal, please stop with the thread derailment, I you want to discuss uBlock and its tweaks, do it in another thread. Please stop with provocations, I'm not going to fight with you, despite you giving me names. I'm here only for what this forum is supposed to be. I decide for myself whether I want to ignore you posts, especially if they are erroneous, misleading, etc.
  15. I didn't leave this conversation, so it is utterly rude to refer to me as "he" in my presence. Making assumptions regarding my knowledge is flagrantly rude, too. Implying I can't read or "does not have the knowledge to understand" is simply unacceptable, I fail to guess why are you still allowed to do that. I don't understand your generally hostile attitude on the website. Despite the fact we (D.Draker and I) already explained it to you many times, provided with scientific proof, we ,of course, did it in a very polite form. (link 1), (link 2) Yet you continue to aggressively argue, post off-topic and derail the thread with non-related matters, unspeakable behaviour and disrespect.
  16. Try to start the browser from a short named folder, like C:\Chrome.
  17. This one - simply ignore, it's what all browsers that aren't supposed to run on XP write in the log.
  18. Ordinary Chrome is free and has no timebomb, this one is paid, so no wonder in this trial version it has a timebomb. Any "fix" is considered to be a crack, so I doubt it will surface on MSFN.
  19. You're very welcome to not reply, I'm just pointing out to the facts and your gross exaggerations, like "all experts". So no articles with "all security experts" voting for uBo to fight WebP then? Btw, you didn't even fulfil any of my "useless" requests. Raymond Hill is the author of uBlock, he can't be considered as an expert with independent views. I don't have anything against uBlock in particular, it's just the fact - in this case uBlock can't do anything to WebP at all, so it's not only off-topic, it's called misleading people. Again, I'm pointing out to the facts, no need to be rude. I suggest you stick to the facts, too, and please watch your behaviour. So far, you aren't giving me anything to "study" on. Most importantly - Raymond Hill never claimed uBlock can defeat WebP, if you still insist he did, please give an article.
  20. No, I asked about "all security experts article", as you claimed before. Sven Taylor is an (editor) of an "advocacy group". It doesn't say he's an expert, nowhere near. In the provided article he simply accuses all browsers of data colllecting, then jumps to suggestions to buy paid VPV services. Not a word about WebP Virus. Claiming Brave as "The most secure and private browser" is especially funny. Super generic, commercially driven article, can't be any simpler. Where did you find "expert opinions" about uBlock in that article? He simply writes "uBlock Origin – is one of the best.." That's it?
  21. It has nothing to do with scepticism, it's just caution! "mistymntncop" looks like a random account on github, nothing official. Has no projects: https://github.com/mistymntncop?tab=projects Not even a description of who that man (woman?) is.
  22. I'd like to read that article where "all security experts considered" this, thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...