msfntor

Some of my links about WEBSITE checks, all online (I see, you know them all...): BLACKLIGHT - A Real-Time WEBSITE PRIVACY Inspector - By Surya Mattu: https://themarkup.org/blacklight Scan your WEBSITE for SECURITY HEADERS - HTTP response headers - by Scott Helme: https://securityheaders.com/ Secure Headers Test: https://gf.dev/secure-headers-test CSP Evaluator: https://csp-evaluator.withgoogle.com/ CSP (Content-Security-Policy) Header Test: https://gf.dev/csp-test Content Security Policy (CSP) Validator: https://cspvalidator.org/#url=https://cspvalidator.org/ Analyze your CSP: https://report-uri.com/home/analyse SSL Server Test by Qualys: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/index.html Domain name or IP address audit tools (DNS, IP, in infos: CSP Header, Web tests): https://ns.tools/ Website analyze Webbcoll: https://webbkoll.dataskydd.net/en PrivacyScore: https://privacyscore.org/ Pingdom Website Speed Test: https://tools.pingdom.com/ Website performances by GTmetrix: https://gtmetrix.com/ PageSpeed Insights by Google: https://pagespeed.web.dev/ TTFB (Time to First Byte) Test: https://gf.dev/ttfb-test

About CatsXP browser (found by swisscows.com, with search for: 猫眼浏览器(Catsxp浏览器) "xp" ) To read these responses: 为什么不开发支出XP。。。Why not develop spending XP. . . wangjkkl: 在尝试让它兼容xp，难度有点大，当然这个和个人能力有直接关系 Trying to make it compatible with xp, it is a bit difficult, of course, this is directly related to personal ability 兼容谷歌插件吧? Is it compatible with Google plug-ins? wangjkkl: 兼容 必须的 主要是现在还搞不定兼容winxp Compatible required Mainly because it is still not compatible with winxp 这浏览器先用用看 Use this browser first ... ... and download link for v0.1.6 ... v0.1.6 1. [!] Several detail corrections and optimizations 2. Kernel: 81.0.4044.92 Here: https://bbs.pcbeta.com/viewthread-1852721-1-1.html

THIS page: https://www.anxz.com/down/133259.html says: Catsxp (Catsxp) v1.4.4 official version (yes this same in my precedent post) Applicable platforms to be reviewed: WinXP, Win7, Win8, Win10 Software size: 71.0 MB Update date: 2021-04-07 18:08 Software language: Simplified Chinese Local download file size: 71.0 M Catsxp is a privacy-protecting browser. The software can protect your browsing history, analyze dangerous websites directly on the webpage, identify ad plug-ins, block webpage viruses and advertisements, and make users more secure when visiting webpages. Avoid malicious plug-ins in the web to read and track your browser records. This browser has the same functions as most browsers. You can search web content normally, you can enter the URL normally to enter the specified page, and you can add frequently visited addresses as Bookmarks, you can download resources in the browser to meet the needs of most users to browse the web; Catsxp aims to protect user privacy. The software interface displays the number of ads currently blocked and the amount of bandwidth saved. If you like this software, download it ! Instructions 　　1, open CatsxpBrowserStandaloneSetup32_90_1_4_4.EXE software to install directly ... ... So try it here: https://www.anxz.com/down/133259.html and get your impressions, please (found it by search for: 猫眼浏览器(Catsxp浏览器) "xp" with Bing, on DcBrowser Modified (in English: Cat's Eye Browser (Catsxp Browser) "xp")

CatsXP browser don't have portable version, so I don't have downloaded it.

The oldest version of CatsXP I've found is v1.4.4: http://www.3h3.com/soft/220381.html http://www.3h3.com/soft/220377.html https://m.jb51.net/softs/list269_1.html - too other browsers download list - and v1.6.19: https://www.jb51.net/softs/770488.html https://m.jb51.net/softs/770488.html - and v1.6.3: https://www.aiya8.com/pcsoft/soft3313.html ...for now

CatsXP: On this page: https://www.catsxp.com/history?more=1 Click last version v0.8.1, so have too all other versions up to and including v0.1.1 "Up to version 0.6.3 (85 engine) supported Vista, transfer by adding StartupParm.txt file with a couple of "portabilize" flags and two parameters specifying profile and cache paths" - translated from here: Chrom'оподобные браузеры - Chrom'similar browsers: http://forum.ru-board.com/topic.cgi?forum=5&active=&topic=50704&start=20

Confirm. Basilisk/Serpent MOEBIUS 55: javascript.options.ion -> true (default): so SPEED BATTLE results: 363 388 366 365 365 369 399 360 347 366 363 373... javascript.options.ion -> false (user set): so SPEED BATTLE results: 37.7 37 37 38.28 37 37.96 ... - in normal window or in Private window - this same... Have set to true (default), but my Moebius is always very lazy to move faster...

"MiniBrowser.exe: entry point not found" (SetProcessDEPPolicy in KERNEL32.dll) window... I'm on Windows x86 SP2.

For "DRM_NO_KEY_SYSTEM" error on bitmovin demo page in DcBrowser, found these 3 links, maybe some utility: https://indiescribable.org/u0o989c/drm_no_key_system-chrome https://githubmemory.com/repo/flathub/com.brave.Browser/issues/10?page=2 https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26042

@Humming Owl wrote: "Can you go to the "HKEY_CURRENT_USER > Software > 360Chrome > default > ui_persist_value" path in the registry and see which value has the "FontFamily" option?" 宋 体 - Sòngtǐ - in English Song Ti (Modifié) - Song Style font... Google translation link: https://translate.google.fr/?hl=fr&sl=auto&tl=en&text= 宋 体&op=translate

Thank you for your reply! In DcBrowser (precedent version, AND 11/11/21 latest too), in Incognito window, I've "Detected, using widevine" - and have error in the player window on bitmovin.com DRM demo. In 360Chrome build 13 M - I've "Detected, using No DRM" - and no error, player play OK. Both browsers says no https (https is strikethrough), not secure link (cause I don't downloaded security hashes) but play OK in 13 M. In the DcBrowser Console from bitmovin page:  chrome-extension://n…dlhkcbhb/dD.js:1467 component---src-comp…c2a5832432efa5.js:1 Version 9 of Highlight.js has reached EOL and is no longer supported. Please upgrade or ask whatever dependency you are using to upgrade. https://github.com/highlightjs/highlight.js/issues/2877 (this same I've in 360Chrome build 13 M) drm:1 Unchecked runtime.lastError: The message port closed before a response was received. 9 Mixed Content: The page at '<URL>' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure font ''. This content should also be served over HTTPS. (unknown) DRM will only work via https://. Will redirect in production. Current environment is: undefined (this same I've in 360Chrome build 13 M) bitmovinplayer.js:41 Adaptive Video Streaming Service by www.bitmovin.com bitmovinplayer.js:41 Player Version 8.73.0 6 It is recommended that a robustness level be specified. Not specifying the robustness level could result in unexpected behavior. (this same I've in 360Chrome build 13 M) 2 chrome-extension://invalid/:1 Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED - so in the chrome-extension://invalid page, have this: "invalid is blocked Requests to the server have been blocked by an extension. Try disabling your extensions. ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT " - But this is in Incognito window... I've yellow Warning in 360Chrome build 13 M on bitmovin OK. page: "DevTools 无法加载 SourceMap： 无法加载 chrome-extension://cdc...kh/lib/webextension-polyfill/dist/browser-polyfill.min.js.map: 的内容HTTP 错误：状态代码 404，net::ERR_UNKNOWN_URL_SCHEME "

Thank you! Have you the link for download this latest version, please? You wrote in the first post: "- Has DRM support --> https://bitmovin.com/demos/drm " Unfortunately this bitmovin.com demo doesn't work here, in the version 4.0.7.22 from 28/10/21. "Detected using Widevine" "Unable to instantiate a key system supporting the required combinations (DRM_NO_KEY_SYSTEM)" - marked in the player window. "Media Source Extension – MSE - MSE is supported by your current browser." "Encrypted Media Extension – EME - EME is supported by your current browser." In the Console: "DRM will only work via https://. Will redirect in production. Current environment is: undefined" - yes have Not secure, Your connection to this site is not secure.

Hmmm no difference here... In DcBrowser, Incognito window, SPEED-BATTLE Overall Score reports: With "Use hardware acceleration.." notched in browser settings: 344 294 318 340 337 314 337 340 338 332 335 328 Without "Use hardware acc...": 303 309 292 348.24 309 296 267 339 334 335 336 310

...Memory size 512 MB... Hardware acceleration on Complete. Oh pity, but I'm waiting for the good action of @Humming Owl, I mean the next build improvements...

why not 3500 MB like others? - I see: the portion of memory that is reserved for graphics is bigger than for other Windows users.

So in DcBrowser don't exist "Optimize memory", "Clear Browsing Data" etc buttons in this status bar at the bottom?.. and in the case of memory cluttering browser don't warn us?.. I always had doubts about the effectiveness of this "Optimize memory" functioning...

Cool, so we could compare approximately, your laptop seems better than mine desktop PC... my Windows reports 3071 MB (from 4 GB 2 memory sticks) - why?.. maybe change memory sticks? (have many, DDR2 1.8 V, but 2.3 V sticks doesn't work?). Today's checks in DcBrowser: 326 320 226 267 344 351.44 347 331 333 267 335 303 315 333 339 332 342 346 etc. Have cleaned Windows with Wise Disk Cleaner 7, so cleaned Prefetch data...hmm I see that in DcBrowser I don't have toolbar at the bottom, this with buttons Optimize memory etc. like in 360Chrome, is this OK. ?..

We can see clearly, from where comes the difference between your results on AMD Sempron 3100+ and mine on Intel Core 2 Duo 6300 - so two cores... - could you mount in your machine also the same processor Intel Core 2 Duo CPU 6300 1.86 GHz, please? it would be really comparable between us!

"Free online browser speed test: SPEED-BATTLE: Computer performance and benchmark test | measure and compare computer speed Speed test online tool | PC and CPU benchmark | Processor performance test SPEED-BATTLE measures online the speed of JavaScript in your browser and shows a comparison to previous visitors. Questions, SPEED-BATTLE can give answers to: Which browser is on my computer fastest in completing the SPEED-BATTLE test tasks? Which operating system is faster when using the same computer and browser version? Which computer is faster when using the same operating system and browser? Test results depend on different parameters (like CPU, browser, plugins/addons, operating system, system memory, number and kind of processes running in parallel and many more). The test will give you a reference value for the performance of your soft- and hardware. For consistent results run it when all other activity of your computer is low." http://www.speed-battle.com/speedtest_e.php ...so Overall Score Best Results, in Incognito window, in my Windows x86 SP2, Intel Core 2 Duo 6300 1.86 GHz, 3 GB RAM: DcBrowser: 353.61 346.27 318.43 350.82 273.86 360Chrome 13.5 r: 328.55 317.08 300.46 309.58 315.2 13 r 6: 333.68 13 M: 322.49 12 r 8: 339.38 12 M: 344.71 11 r 4 SP2: 322.49 314.77 305.84 302.47 303.32 11.0 M SP2: 313.49 304.49 283.78 308.02 296.62 Basilisk/Serpent 55 latest: 411.18 406.31 398.93 366.51 394.29 Basilisk 52 ia32 20201003: 382.05 361.68 368.93 374.28 356.8 New Moon 28.10 20210821: 449.36 431.91 395.5 406.94 440.18 IceApe UXP 20210821: 439.55 423.36 422.54 394.87 432.14 IceApe UXP 20200905: 457.29 448.08 447.39 430.46 395.5

"What is Subresource Integrity? SRI is a new W3C specification that allows web developers to ensure that resources hosted on third-party servers have not been tampered with. Use of SRI is recommended as a best-practice, whenever libraries are loaded from a third-party source.Learn more about how to use subresource integrity on MDN." to read here: https://www.srihash.org/ "To fully test your browser for subresource integrity support, please open this page": https://w3c-test.org/subresource-integrity/subresource-integrity.html Bests results of my checks in different browsers (Incognito window) here: DcBrowser: Harness status: OK Found 42 tests 42 Pass ...then: 360Chrome 13.5 r: 15 Pass 27 Not Run 360Chrome 13 M: 15 Pass 27 Not Run 360Chrome 13 r: 14 Pass 28 Not Run 360Chrome 12 M: 13 Pass 29 Not Run 360Chrome 12 r: 14 Pass 28 Not Run 11 M: 17 Pass 25 Not Run 11 r: 16 Pass 26 Not Run ... Basilisk/Serpent 55: 42 Pass New Moon 28.10: 42 Pass ...

"Dark Background and Light Text" extension has this dark background in quotes problem, if notched "Default" in its settings for MSFN. With "Simple CSS", or" Disabled", no more this problem. ..not only in Serpent 55, in other browsers too (eg. 360Chrome, DcBrowser ...) Its @InterLinkedextension's issue. So @InterLinkedshould notch "Simple CSS"...if use this extension.

Correct BrowserAudit.com security test in my precedent post: tested in Incognito window: In build 12 (Chromium 78): Incognito window: 12 warnings, 0 critical. Build 13 (Chromium 86): Incognito window: 12 warnings, 0 critical. DcBrowser (Chromium 75): Incognito window: 5 warnings, 0 critical.

@ArcticFoxie, I have full confidence in @Humming Owl skills, and I'm sure he is well aware of some glitches or cosmetic inadequacies present in this build of DcBrowser, he will surely correct them if time will allow him. But in its present version, this new browser is already a great, beautiful surprise for me...I value it above all other browsers I know. I see that you have found some minor or non-existent problems for me: I use this browser and I am HAPPY! Sure logo is a bit big, I don't need inner IE drawing so big in it... The font rendering is very readable, PERFECT for me, who is a bit demanding in the matter. Spell-check dictionary - I don't care at all, to delete surely. A few typos here and there that I've seen - will be corrected for sure... If it's about BrowserAudit.com security test, I can't do it anymore on version 11 because I deleted it from my Windows, not being interested anymore. In build 12 (Chromium 78): Incognito window: 12 warnings, 0 critical. Build 13 (Chromium 86): Incognito window: 12 warnings, 0 critical. DcBrowser (Chromium 75): Incognito window: 5 warnings, 0 critical. Anyway: "I have full confidence in @Humming Owl skills, and I'm sure he's well aware of some glitches or cosmetic inadequacies present in this build of DcBrowser, he'll surely fix them if time will allow him." That's it. Youtube videos watching perfect in DcBrowser, no problems neither video nor sound. If you get a free moment, watch this video on the Youtube in 360Chrome 13 builds and tell your impressions, please: ... This one: /watch?v=rEuRJ9iyxmY and this one: /watch?v=Ute1kKtyhB0 I am waiting patiently for the time when the bad pass will be over...

360Chrome 11 r 4 XP x86 SP2: 24.7 Hmm WHY you're "not impressed" by DcBrowser? Personally, I'm VERY impressed...eg. under Settings/Site Settings, we have "Popups and redirects" blocked, then Ads.. blocked on sites that show intrusive or misleading ads, ... Dark Mode button has Brightness control. Have zoom at 125%. - and more and more customizations. It's pure joy for me, this browser.

So what do you think about this: Speedometer 2.0 benchmark results in my Windows x86 SP2 with Intel Core 2 Duo 6300, 1.86 GHz (incognito window without extensions running), fan cleaned at the very last moment: New Moon 28.10: scored 7.19 9.2 Basilisk 55 20211106: scored 10.9 Centaury 2021.07.31: scored 11.4 360Chrome 12 M (based on Chromium 78): scored 25.4 DcBrowser 4.0.7.22 (based on Chromium 75): scored 26.2 Thank you very much @Humming Owl for the modified version of DC Browser that I've downloaded today. Great, Dark Mode, Developer Tools in English, visible nice font, many customisations (eg. Brightness on Dark Mode button!..: “The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness can never extinguish it” John 1:5) ... so my new top quality browser!