msfntor

Why you " minimize programs to the systray instead of to the task bar ", please?... Tell me please And in CrowdInspect I see too 360Chrome.exe on UDP listening on ALL IPv4 local IP connections oh uh

A Pentagon official said he resigned because US cybersecurity is no match for China, calling it 'kindergarten level': https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/a-pentagon-official-said-he-resigned-because-us-cybersecurity-is-no-match-for-china-calling-it-kindergarten-level/ar-AAPmQ47

Ah sorry, you're talking about a launcher for this browser, the process 360Loader.exe - which was made by Russians on the Russian forum, where can I read about it, please? Have you the Russian link, please? And those Russians, they must be cool, because they are interested in the development of the same browser as us...

Hi @D.Drakerhmm, I am well aware of the Russians, I can not be more! But CrowdInspect is a very good tool that I have been using for long years. Never problems. Address: CROWDSTRIKE, INC. 150 Mathilda Place, Ste. 300 Sunnyvale, CA 94086 - so California, Russia. or ? Visit California: https://www.visitcalifornia.com/en Martin Brinkmann from ghacks.net about CrowdInspect FREE tool, article: https://www.ghacks.net/2017/02/23/crowdinspect-second-opinion-malware-scanner-with-virustotal-integration/

Page 1, of course. Very heavy, difficult in FF based forks. I don't use NoScript, but in uBlock I block 3rd-party scripts and frames only, it's sufficient for me. And I've more security defenses. My latest interest is into block redirects... I like much the Browser Audit, thanks! - results in versions 12 of 360Chrome: 12 M: Passed 369, Warning 15 12 r 8: Passed 350, Warning 34 both Critical 0, Skipped 20.

Thank you! And a page not far away, VERY heavy; to view it, you need some time..: msfn.org/board/topic/182647-my-browser-builds-part-3/ With 360Chrome builds not big endeavor, effort, but with my Firefox offspring I use, not the same tune.!..

Or these websites heavy loading: Canvas Performance Test by Scott Porter: http://www.smashcat.org/av/canvas_test/ Winscribe snow: https://windscribe.com/miner/gamvw4hc and https://windscribe.com/miner/76ymafne - ( for these snowing website, switch your "Dark Background and White Text" extension to "Simple CSS", if not - snow stay fixed.) What's tool to look on scores you wrote about?...

Sure my answer was off topic, we are interested in heavy websites for eventual crashes, that's all, sorry

How to crash Chrome browser?: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40367087/how-to-crash-chrome-browser I also tried to crash the chrome with these websites (but without result): Browser Reaper: https://reaperbugs.pwnsdx.com/index# , then Marka.link: https://marka.link/#

So I am using a tool called CrowdInspect 1.5.0.0 from CrowdStrike. For the process 360Loader.exe, in the "MHR" column, I've red point with two exclamations, think of malware inside, maybe?.. In this link: https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/free-community-tool-crowdinspect/ - we read: "Shown in the “MHR” column, Team Cymru maintains a repository of known malware that can be queried given an MD5 hash of the file contents. In this case we are simply querying for a yes/no answer so the results can be one of the following: ... !! (o Red icon) The entry DOES exist in the MHR database. The process is known to be malware. This is bad." I hope it's false-positive result...

Surely you've looked at your extensions (ex Neat URL...)

The contrast setting of the monitor might be too high if you are using it with curtains drawn or at night. If the adjustment is only a few button presses away, I would tweak that, and avoid losing dark adapted vision. If you try to set a dark theme to every application, there will still remain more than one that is light, and that will make it hard to see anything on your customized dark applications. If "blindingly bright" colors, then look at capacitors in your video card maybe...or contrast setting of the monitor like @j7n wrote. If not, I use dark theme, AND "Dark Background and Light Text" extension : https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/dark-background-and-light/cdcoopnlkdlmphjpjggdmhohkiklonkh?hl=en-US - the best one.

And don't forget the Windows x86 SP2 owners, please... Surely it would be nice to translate this Beta to English, we count on the good will of @ArcticFoxie and @Humming Owl! Thanks in advance for you both!

360Chrome 360-browser/360se13.1.4010.0 are Beta version, latest stable is 13.1.1662.0, links to download Chinese versions here: https://browser.360.cn/se/

"Other search engines" section from the Settings has these websites added in one of my 360Chrome builds: accessify.com duckduckgo.com etsy.com frogfind.com gigablast.com google.com lehollandaisvolant.net okeano.com oscobo.com oscobo.co.uk qwant.com securityheaders.com swisscows.com time.is ..and more EDIT: All oscobo results links lead to redirects (by motherpipe.net to website... but first 4 positions are Ads, that redirect from motherpipe.net to search.yahoo.com)

TESTS of "Other search engines" repeated 3 or more times: 13 r 4 (no extensions): add new engines (or some websites), but these are all DELETED after restart of browser: https://time.is/ , https://accessify.com/ (add after click on "Analyze"), https://www.etsy.com/ , https://swisscows.com/?culture=en 13 r 5 (no extensions), this same websites: add new engines, and all are PERSISTENT after the browser's restart...

Testing, results: 11 r 4: add new engines in "Other search engines", but all search engines are DELETED after restart of the browser 12 r 8: add new engines 13 r 3: add new engines 13 r 4: DOESN'T add 13 r 5: add SOME new engines 11 M: add, then engines are DELETED after restart of the browser 12 M: add new engines 13 M: add (at the top of little tabs), but all engines are DELETED after restart of the browser.

Thank you, but I prefer default one, with the colored icons...the more color in life the better...

Actually, it's not very important, this OpenSearch thing, unless a website with bad intentions gets into it - then in that case someone should definitely not make it default ..but delete it. @ArcticFoxie, and @Humming Owl - we look forward to your new 360Chrome builds! good luck

So could you put this code in all your 360Chrome builds, please?

Very interesting @ArcticFoxie, this highjacking settings story, I look forward to the results of your (open) research! ...too another (google everywhere) story: sometimes, google creates the tab with its search page, with the sentence I've written here on MSFN... weird?.. ...too this: I've started 360Chrome build, clicked on the search window...and accounts.google.com gmail login popup in the first tab... weird - I don't use gmail... And another: I've written in one of my precedent posts, about behavior of 360Chrome v9.5 M: "If STYLES are off, then all results are on the left...see WAVE web accessibility evaluation tool (with WHOER.net report): https://wave.webaim.org/report#/whoer.net " Searched for "no style information on some websites"... in Firefox - fix is easy: click View/Page Style/ then notch: "Basic Page Style". But in chrome NO option to Enable/Disable Stylesheets ... if no styles are showing, the browser might not be handling the Stylesheets from some websites properly... Found these links: A website looks weird: https://www.whatismybrowser.com/guides/troubleshooting/website/website-looks-weird W3C Feed Validation Service: https://validator.w3.org/feed/

In the latest v12 M build, under Settings/Basics/Manage search engines/Other search engines - have many search engines and other websites (12, with Time.is, DuckDuckGo, Gigablast.com, google.com, frogfind.com, Infinity Search, Okeano, oscobo.com, Swisscows..), which came in here by themselves, without me doing this myself... All other 360Chrome v11, v12 and v13 builds by @Humming Owl and @ArcticFoxie present this same behavior here. - tested with Time.is website.

In the @Humming Owl builds, I get the page of code, (XML file ?..): (this change after restart of the page)---> YrXyjl8SSjq4_sO1lZM5pi_=new then: ... Function();Evxkd_j6KlF6t8qXZXIw6m=window.open;lZ7lAyf6czWMXn635TpzTZE37=window.alert;oiT0Bghuvx46R84AScWGU9Yh=new Function();gWWPdPqWyvJA9FpLJTL=document.getSelection;xVPufll2tDgkxKaMYer7=new Function();pQ0Jxf0fX7Ol7q3mPdA4QJFT=window.focus;l4VyvkKjFSK81TK2Vc=window.showModelessDialog;aRa9nDQt9Ao42M474ad98V49=new Function();AZX2Nb7yzhxGZKkk20u6aRJiJ=window.scrollBy;NYTE4fHHPWhz7xMpq=new ... Who Owns My Availability? yesitsyou 2011-04-21T08:41:00Z You YOU whenshitgotreal 2011-04-21T08:41:00Z YOU This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below. ... Function();(function(){var ourScript=document.getElementsByTagName('script');for(var i=0; i < ourScript.length; i++){if(ourScript.id && ourScript.id === 'b39_hIBs8mCRyCLmO'){ourScript.parentNode.removeChild(ourScript);break;}}})(); </script> <script id="b39_hIBs8mCRyCLmO">...</script> <script> ((aggressive = 3) => { const script = document.currentScript; script.dataset.injected = true; const post = (name, detail) => script.dispatchEvent(new ... ... - etc etc whole page, and at the bottom, the suite of scripts like in your builds - only this: Who Owns My Availability? yesitsyou 2011-04-21T08:41:00Z You YOU whenshitgotreal 2011-04-21T08:41:00Z YOU This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below. <feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"> <title>Who Owns My Availability?</title> <link href="http://whoownsmyavailability.com/atom.xml" rel="self"/> <link href="http://whoownsmyavailability.com/"/> <id>yesitsyou</id> <updated>2011-04-21T08:41:00Z</updated> <author> <name>You</name> </author> <author>...</author> <entry> <title>YOU</title> <link href="http://whoownsmyavailability.com/"/> <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://whoownsmyavailability.com"/> <id>whenshitgotreal</id> <updated>2011-04-21T08:41:00Z</updated> <summary>YOU</summary> </entry> <entry>...</entry> </feed> <feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">...</feed> - That's in your builds only...without all the code at the top... I'm not a developer so...

Look for the results, which are very different compared to results given by @Humming Owl's builds...

Have you clicked on this " gigantic "YOU" ", @ArcticFoxie?..