Vistaboy

Good work!!! I've installed it on Roytam1 Firefox 45 ESR and i've seen a huge improvement in fluidity/reactivity giving quite similar performance to Chrome 49. On old processors (no SSE or very early SSE capable) it's worthy of application. tHANKS Just one question: what language pack do you use for 45 FF ESR? I've tried the Thunderbird 45* but it's not compatible with "nightly" version of FF

Thanks for the XP update version . I see several handshake failure (Root CA) -> NA (result) but zero alert/detection It could be helpful to print a log file just to overcome the no-resizing window.

So summing up, the correct work of MSE can only be gained by removing the registry POS hack and by running MSEU v1.9. No problem accessing registry from an adjacent partition with other OS (vista/w7/8/10) but i'd like to ask if is it possibile to design some kind of script that you can just run in XP/Posready system and automatically, during rebooting, it removes the POS hack.

I used Office 2007 which theoretically doesn't need anyone of that 13 Compatibility Pack (as docx are the standard format for Office 2007) but in past i was forced to install a lot of this Compatibility updates in XP and more often on Vista because of the well know windows update hanging problem. Can i uninstall it at all now or there could be issues?

I made it run but it didn't even start. In task manager i see one process qmc.exe appearing and after 1 second disappearing by itself. Is it a good sign?

Just curious if Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer addresses missing KB4500331 & KB4024402 (not automatic updates) as severe security leaks in a POS/XP system.

Could it be another MS kind of arrow against XP users? Making unusable their mailing system on the most popular browser leaves wide doubts.

It seems that outlook/hotmail accounts don't work anymore on chrome 49.0.2623.112 (last xp supported). The inbox windows is overall blank. I've disabled + removed all the extensions but nothing changes.

And 1.17.4 installed I mistakenly assumed that armageddon fix prevented from mess with config option.

Dentists using XP should make discounted rates because they have not incurred upgrade costs Looking for an XP dentist starting today

I'm quite sure (for reading in the past google conditions) that google can always connect informations gathered from research and all others activities (logged or not) and associate them to the device id used. So even if you stay un-logged from Google World, the Google World is always logged into you.

I've just installed the armageddon fix on 52.9.0ESR and still can't install uBlock-firefox-legacy-1.16.4.10 because the extension can't be verified. Is an armageddon fake?

Oh, memory gets troubles with all that specific tips to keep XP as usable oS but I should have remembered it! I think it's time to pin some relevant content like the one you've reported.

Does anyone know ho to disable annoying developer security advise for ublock 1.16.20 at every start of chrome 49?

That's great, thank for the reassurance!

On a fresh XP-POSREADY post-marathon WU i found: NOT INSTALLED: KB4018466 KB4019204 KB4024402 INSTALLED: KB4022747 KB4024323 KB4025218 It remains a mistery in MS mind why a Posready system did not benefit in automatic from the red updates. And it's ridicolous that Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer doesn't give any advice on such important lacking updates.

It seems a very strong repository, multilanguage updates give it a respectable plus: hoping something like that can be accessible when it will be required after WU servers dismiss.

I tried 3.5.1 and found it very slow while the last v2 version (2.2.1.1043) is working greatly together with last MBAE Any chances these 2 softwares can go in conflict in a real exploit situation over the 15/23 common tasks?

Well, NM28 is gaining advantage over others. Didn't expect this, cause my experience was not so good in terms of addons/extensions, finding Basilisk 52 a lot more flexible. Drastically, i would say that with Basisisk 52 on XP i'm sure i can access every site i could access with Chrome(70+)/FFQuantum(57+) on W7 and I can use the same extensions (version 52 related): so B-52 is the definitive browser (and an agreeable coktail, too ) But, that's my experience (right for me/wrong for others). Could be interesting if others can summarise PRO and CONS of these poll competitor for their daily usage on XP systems.

That are good starting point. I made use of little registry mods. Generally in a fresh installed XP i always launched the last working XP installer (151/152) to install JAVA and then brutally extract the new .exe installer (jre-8u211-windows-i586.exe) and replace it in the programs file. The dream would be a little cmd workaround that automate the process to get last updated java.

maybe it's time to sticky Java update procedure for XP

I suggest Repartition Bad Drive. It can isolate the defective cluster preventing access. A lot of disks (that would be worth of garbage) can be saved and still works like a charme.

Well, the circle is closed and MSFN, with all such a great members here, gave a immeasurable support to mantain XP alive. Thank you. Also update some broken guide links could be helpful to preserve installation/use of XP The links provided here are unreachable: a re-link to this guide can adjust it.

oh no, doing so you'll never know if MS will give an update for POSReady2009 in next years as they did it in 2017 about Wannacry for XP after 3 years of EOS

I've never used 45 ESR SSE cause processor (despite older) support SSE2. Well, i'm trying the Roytam1 (firefox-45.9.15-20190330-449d61309-win32-sse.7z) and i can see a huge speed improvement also without patch I know that 45ESR SSE can have compatibility issue with sereval web pages and plugins, but for the less ram consume seems to be on increased system .