Jump to content

VistaLover

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,307

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    97

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    Greece

 Content Type 

Everything posted by VistaLover

  1. VistaLover
    ... But why is Thorium reported to be Google Chrome 109 there? For consistency, weren't you supposed to test the same Thorium variant but on different OS (XP vs 7) ?
  2. VistaLover
    In the repo copy maintained by roytam1, those two toolbar buttons were removed by Tobin himself as part of: https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/commit/360e21244397998a6183d847c65eaeb3b48fbbe0 352 + <!-- XXXTobin: These need to be exterminated 353...381 382 + --> on Aug 8, 2020 ...
  3. VistaLover
    "Out-of-Band" new Supermium (122) release, to patch publicly disclosed Chromium vulnerabilities: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v122-r5 (in response to https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/570 ) ; @nicolaasjan :
  4. VistaLover
    ... And if you took the time to read the linked reddit thread in its entirety, you would have also found that: In any case, and since this is OT here , I won't be posting more on this issue; however, I and other MSFN members will, no doubt, continue using ImgUr as an external image hoster, if it suits my/their needs... Regards.
  5. VistaLover
    ... Be that as it may, win32's close collaborator and co-maintainer/administrator of Supermium's GitHub issue tracker, docrR, has already posted this: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/567 (BTW, that X link won't open/display for those without an account/those browsing X anonymously); the issue has also been pinned in the tracker, so it's difficult to not notice it ... ... My thoughts exactly - this doesn't mean that official sources of any given software are 100% immune to being tampered with, but this doesn't seem to be the case here...
  6. VistaLover
    ... It all makes sense now : https://www.reddit.com/r/imguralternatives/comments/1357t3l/imgur_just_started_blocking_vpns_from_loading/
  7. VistaLover
    ... But you were given named (and versioned) options already: ... Let's start with the most trouble-free option, the XUL ("legacy") UserScript Manager Greasemonkey-for-Pale-Moon (works on St52, too): https://github.com/janekptacijarabaci/greasemonkey/releases/tag/3.31.4Fork https://github.com/janekptacijarabaci/greasemonkey/releases/download/3.31.4Fork/greasemonkey-3.31.4-pm_forkBranch.xpi ... And don't take this personally , but at my older age I refrain from "spoon-feeding" others ... Take good care and good night!
  8. VistaLover
    ... Since you're low on RAM, why did you disable disk cache? I might be wrong , but doesn't this mean that the browser cache is now stored solely in RAM?
  9. VistaLover
    ... Provided you already have installed a St52-compatible Userscript Editor (XUL/WE, see the recommendations by AstroSkipper ), you should've scrolled down to: and clicked on one of the three offered options; ALL 3 work fine here (St52+VM) ; first option is the GH direct link, already provided in clear text by @AstroSkipper ; the "mirrors" will get you to the respective UserScript Portals, where you have to click appropriate "Install" buttons; FWIW, direct links below : https://update.greasyfork.org/scripts/423851/Simple%20YouTube%20Age%20Restriction%20Bypass.user.js https://openuserjs.org/install/zerodytrash/Simple_YouTube_Age_Restriction_Bypass.user.js If none of the links work for you, then something particular to your St52 profile may interfere...
  10. VistaLover
    ... Indeed , as per: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commit/407a79e79f75a1de2af5588d8d54e853683af43f#diff-f1692414557ddbb1da94a106acb550a38c4145360214b795e77437b02b2a69ea (as part of upstream #2503 ) ...
  11. VistaLover
    ... On mine, too ; this has been already reported before by him/them, but D.Draker, Saxon (and the rest of the gang ), for reasons probably only particular to him/them, have problems displaying ImgUr image embeds inside MSFN posts; so, by linking to yet another ImgUr screengrab, you're not proving anything to him/them ; FWIW, "error 429" is explained here - I have NO issue at all viewing "imgur.com" hosted pictures in any (recent-ish) browser/OS (Vista SP2, Win7 SP1, Win10) in my household ...
  12. VistaLover
    I think I was clear : Linked binaries are of the official Basilisk browser application (by Basilisk-Dev), built on the official UXP platform (by MCP); requires Win7 SP1 at minimum to launch, has ALL support for Web Extensions, multiprocess, Container tabs and EME removed (compared to Serpent 52); thus, usability-wise, it's like official Pale Moon+Australis interface+WebRTC; I keep a copy of it myself in my household's Win7 SP1 old laptop, just to check/verify if St52's bugs are also present there, too ...
  13. VistaLover
    ... Try to watch inside your browser below YT test clip (it's safe, BTW ): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7t0SqerlBA0 without: a) being logged-in to your Google/YouTube account (where you have already verified your adult age ) && b) without using the userscript I linked to previously... Best regards ...
  14. VistaLover
    FWIW, someone else did post there about the same issue, so Bk's maintainer became aware : https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?p=251585#p251585 Culprit: https://repo.palemoon.org/Basilisk-Dev/Basilisk/commit/24d2cf3cade432ac657e353a974f5edf306bab0d Cause: Fix in official Basilisk: https://repo.palemoon.org/Basilisk-Dev/Basilisk/commit/40afe7b5b25758f0b233a9e26a63a03d46b06c30 Latest binary releases with the fix: https://archive.basilisk-browser.org/2024.05.11/windows/ ... "We" did inherit that bug initially , but also fixed "here" (at the last moment?) : https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commit/fffa564c0caf1b2f0c0d06797989722488265222
  15. VistaLover
    ... Age-related YouTube blocks can be successfully circumvented, while being logged out of course, by using below userscript: https://github.com/zerodytrash/Simple-YouTube-Age-Restriction-Bypass?tab=readme-ov-file#userscript
  16. VistaLover
    @UCyborg : https://github.com/IDA-RE-things/Chrome-xp-api-adapter?tab=readme-ov-file#current-limitations ... so your WinXP x64 SP2 setup probably NOT supported ...
  17. VistaLover
    ... Well yes, sadly, this has also happened to me, especially when using Serpent 52 to post (only very rarely happens when using KafanMiniBrowser ) ... Well, after reloading the page (and praying during the page reload that whatever you've already written won't be lost ), do NOT immediately re-click the "Submit" button; first open in a new tab the MSFN thread you're posting to and inquire whether your post has indeed been uploaded, despite the browser hang; once you verify this is not the case, only then do click the "Submit" button anew ; FWIW, I had similar issues when using St52 to post comments on GitHub, but now, since MS made GH almost unusable in UXP-based browsers, I use KMB for GH (where that issue almost never manifests itself) ... Kind regards.
  18. VistaLover
    ... Archived in Oct 2023 - the GH repo that is ... Development has been migrated to GitLab : https://gitlab.com/eyeo/anti-cv/abp-filters-anti-cv https://gitlab.com/eyeo/anti-cv/abp-filters-anti-cv#installation https://easylist-downloads.adblockplus.org/abp-filters-anti-cv.txt Kindest regards ... EDIT: It would appear this ABP list is compatible with uBO-legacy : but incompatible with the WE version of uBO (latest DEV here, i.e. 1.57.3b8):
  19. VistaLover
    ... Or, more probably, using the same compiler but with different compilation scripts/configuration, depending on the OS the final binaries are targeting ...
  20. VistaLover
    ... 99.99% of times , when the OS generates that error upon trying to launch an ".exe" file, it means that the "Sub System Version" value inside the EXE's PE Header has been set (by the compiler) to a figure higher than the one corresponding to the current OS (e.g. XP=5.1, XPx64=5.2, Vista=6.0, Win7=6.1, Win8=6.2, Win8.1=6.3, Win10/11=10.0); using special software to modify that field of the PE header to an appropriate value for the current OS will allow for the executable to launch, unless some other kernel dependency isn't being fulfilled (in which case the OS will generate an appropriate ERROR message, different to the initial one ) ... Below screengrab is with the AVX2 Thorium variant: TL;DR; ALL the builds you tried have been configured to require Win10+ out-of-the-box ...
  21. VistaLover
    ... Leave your router alone ; it's NOT the root cause of this issue; a simple test on Qualys SSL Labs will reveal that the host is currently inaccessible via IPv6: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=www.void.gr
  22. VistaLover
    ... Not quite ; the list is actually being updated quasi-frequently, you can see so for yourself by visiting: https://github.com/kargig/greek-adblockplus-filter/commits/master/void-gr-filters.txt (most recent modification was just one week ago), however its maintainer is being remiss in also updating its version string, which appears to have been stuck at v2023112600 (Nov 26th 2023?) ; if one feels uncomfortable/vexed about this fact, the list's GH issue tracker is https://github.com/kargig/greek-adblockplus-filter/issues FWIW, with just an IPv4 VDSL+ connection inside Greece, the host "void.gr" can be successfully accessed here ...
  23. VistaLover
    https://www.patreon.com/win32/about
  24. VistaLover
    ... Ah yes ; all these are works of the Chinese developer "weolar" ... Actually called "XPChrome" (perhaps why the confusion with another Chinese project, CatsXP ) : https://msfn.org/board/topic/185914-chrome-115-working-on-windows-xp-32-bit/ https://msfn.org/board/topic/185939-chromium-115-for-windows-xp-without-one-core-api/ https://github.com/weolar/xpchrome/releases
  25. VistaLover
    OT , but which specific version of CatsXP was XP-compatible?
×
×
  • Create New...