Tihiy

I'm also affected! Athlon-1000,Abit KT7A,256 PC133,120GB,GF4MX - took 4 hours to install, everything works very slow, but, in safemode, everything works perfect (both for Beta1 and 5219)! I've tried removing all devices, reinstalling drivers from XP, but still no remedy. Maybe Microsoft can help?

To solve SHGetFolderPathA dependancy, install my 98 Revolutions Pack (with care!) (http://tihiy.ahanix.org) discussed in Unofficial Service Pack subforum or 98SE2ME with option 3. Or you can replace that string with any other shorter non-sense function.

Can you just replace that strings in exes/dlls with hex editor? Will game run?

Remove /b.

Very interesting, although i'm not German. Strange that I still can see topic and links UPD: Really, really very interesting and hard work, at least on 9x distro. I've never seen such quality before.

That's the main problem of all free task managers - it's impossible to get memory usage without writing a low level driver. I remember MS WinTop PowerToy did it well. If I'll rewrite my taskmanager I'll use WinTop driver functionality.

And what about New 98 FE + 98 SE + ME patches available? There are a bunch of fixes not included in SP now, including interesting unofficial KRNL386.EXE patch.

Well, IE slipstreaming is possible, but hard to make right. I think you should do 2 things: - copy all IE updated files into setup dir (i.e. mshtml*,browseui,browselc,shdoc401,sh401lc,shdoclc,shdocvw,urlmon,wininet,iexpore and some other files) - edit ie*.inf (search Unattended Windows, nLite and other forums for details on IE6->Win2000 slipstreaming) for correct version, new files and other info. That's advanced. As for DirectX it's much easier to do silent install (you can turn off Dx6 install and break install order to reduce setup time, but it's very advanced).

patchworks, please notice because most icons you suggested are 32-bit versions only, they won't display propertly without RP. If you won't install Shell Update original ME files won't be installed (except MSIMG32.DLL but you can skip it if aren't using LameSkin) As for really something useful, I think additional property sheet page with icon-changing ability for folders/files will be useful; i remember IconPackager from Stardock can do it but it is shareware; are there any free analogs?

This question is discussed many times in Revolutions Pack forum. It is an API extending technology which goal is to provide ability to run some Unicode applications designed to run on NT-XP.

It is impossible now because 2k screensavers use API which aren't supported on 9x. Wait a month before KernelXP technology arrives.

IE6SP2 have 6.0.2900 file versions. As for MS "xpsp2" tags for IE6SP1 - there was interesting article somewhere@msdnblogs. And browseui.dll was solved long time ago as MDGx says.

I've got it to load even w/o KernelXP with some simple enough modifications, but it fails to display EULA - looks like EULA module is checking OS and wants XP. When version emulation will work, i'll give AR7 a try.

Может я и не прав. Вообще тут на англицком говорить нуна... А то бить будут. Since it is an English forum.

Better to ask @RU-BOARD http://forum.ru-board.com/topic.cgi?forum=62&topic=0027 Лучше спроси там ^^ 1) First - TweakUI addon, it is optional Second - KB891711 fix, it is optional И то и другое вроде можно выбирать. Но можно и выключить, и без проблем. msconfig! 2) NVidia residents is optional if you aren't using special options Наверное нет, особенно если не используешь всякие левые их фичи или мой RP. 3) Bred2 Notepad replacement is buggy and not so good for non-Russians. А по мне, так NotepadEx круче всего. Бред2 уж точно Gape вставлять не будет, обратись к eGorZ на том форуме, хотя лучше про блокнот не начинать... А еще, из описания и по жизни Bred2 никогда не открывал файлов более 1МБ.

Khm, 122Mb with 98lite is a.. Distro? You can freely delete whole folder if you have original 98CD and 98lite installer. Its hard to separate them if they merged already.

^^ rloew recent post. So, this check should be removed... or not removed... it is useless anyway.

Well, maybe I should remove that check.

Well, if specified drive have size >128GB, this message will be shown. If it does but it is filled to more than 128GB, this message won't be shown. I'm not sure if it is a right method but it is one of.

Here it is: Scandskw 32-bit replacement, v"1.1" - Do not allows to check >128GB disk if it is not filled by data more than 128GB. - Do not allows to check NTFS drives. Resources can be translated. Why i can't edit my post on 1st page? scandskw.zip

Without a problem!.. Anything more?

I can't see reason... Give me good example, please.

WRONG! As before, it's wrapper over shell functions. Delete scandisk.exe and check if you don't believe.

Yes, hahaha! I'm writing everything on it. That was my secret.