Jump to content

Tihiy

Developer
  • Posts

    2,848
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25
  • Donations

    280.00 USD 
  • Country

    Mauritius

Everything posted by Tihiy

  1. I've got it to load even w/o KernelXP with some simple enough modifications, but it fails to display EULA - looks like EULA module is checking OS and wants XP. When version emulation will work, i'll give AR7 a try.
  2. Может я и не прав. Вообще тут на англицком говорить нуна... А то бить будут. Since it is an English forum.
  3. Better to ask @RU-BOARD http://forum.ru-board.com/topic.cgi?forum=62&topic=0027 Лучше спроси там ^^ 1) First - TweakUI addon, it is optional Second - KB891711 fix, it is optional И то и другое вроде можно выбирать. Но можно и выключить, и без проблем. msconfig! 2) NVidia residents is optional if you aren't using special options Наверное нет, особенно если не используешь всякие левые их фичи или мой RP. 3) Bred2 Notepad replacement is buggy and not so good for non-Russians. А по мне, так NotepadEx круче всего. Бред2 уж точно Gape вставлять не будет, обратись к eGorZ на том форуме, хотя лучше про блокнот не начинать... А еще, из описания и по жизни Bred2 никогда не открывал файлов более 1МБ.
  4. Khm, 122Mb with 98lite is a.. Distro? You can freely delete whole folder if you have original 98CD and 98lite installer. Its hard to separate them if they merged already.
  5. ^^ rloew recent post. So, this check should be removed... or not removed... it is useless anyway.
  6. Well, maybe I should remove that check.
  7. Well, if specified drive have size >128GB, this message will be shown. If it does but it is filled to more than 128GB, this message won't be shown. I'm not sure if it is a right method but it is one of.
  8. Here it is: Scandskw 32-bit replacement, v"1.1" - Do not allows to check >128GB disk if it is not filled by data more than 128GB. - Do not allows to check NTFS drives. Resources can be translated. Why i can't edit my post on 1st page? scandskw.zip
  9. Without a problem!.. Anything more?
  10. I can't see reason... Give me good example, please.
  11. WRONG! As before, it's wrapper over shell functions. Delete scandisk.exe and check if you don't believe.
  12. Yes, hahaha! I'm writing everything on it. That was my secret.
  13. azagahl, where can I get that WINFILE.EXE? I can't find it in 2k distro.
  14. Well, you can if it works OK. My scandisk is bigger, because - Bit more features - Includes more icon variations, including 32-bit ones - PowerBasic compiler sux! You can compress it with UPX executable packer. As for Kernel32.dll, it's because it has hard-coded function offset values - it's difficult to write proper calls for undocumented APIs.
  15. AH FORGOT!!! It works only with KERNEL32.DLL 4.10.2225 (included in SP2RC3 and higher)
  16. Here is my 2 hours of work: 32-bit scandisk. What? No, no! Not really rewrited scan disk 9x function or such. It's just a replacement over standard scandskw and: - As a 32-bit application, it's more stable! - As a 32-bit application, it can talk with other 32-bit extensions - As a 32-bit application, it can be skinned! It supports standard parameters: scandskw.exe [disk list] [parameters] /a Check all your local hard disks. /n Start and quit ScanDisk automatically. /p Prevent ScanDisk from correcting any errors it finds. +additional+ /surface: Force surface scan /custom: Disallow to change your settings /noui: Background (no UI) scanning /min: Minimized scanning Tihiy scandskw.exe
  17. USER.EXE without proper USER32.DLL will cause LOCKUP! Have you deleted USER32.DLL also?
  18. Yes! Take a look at: http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=36123
  19. Why there are different versions for FE and SE?
  20. Wrote my own history - didn't like it: deleted Anything special? Even Office?!
  21. Really, it looks like hexed (even resources aren't changed) file. But why it can't be from MS? It looks like high quality patch anyway.
  22. Really i'm lost... Should i remove or stay with my current check code? As I understand, this patch does not check icon before loading, it removes theoretical exploit possibility, preventing buffer overrun. MDGx, maybe you should add OS checking code? I don't think that it will be good to install it on other OSes.
  23. Yes, and should it should replace MS patch? I believe 2 vulnerabilites meant in article are separated.
  24. Thats OMG! MS made actual new patch for Windows? Where did you find it?! I can't see any info about it on page. Slovenian update still without new KRNL386.EXE...
×
×
  • Create New...