vinifera

if we exclude underwater monsters from another dimension, then its really not that bad I was expecting much more worse movie of it

now watched Elysium, not bad sets and "tech" stuff, but story sucked rank: 3/10

just saw After Earth (2013) not bad movie to waste hour and half but also nothing special, just another sci-fi that tried to be something rank: 2/10

problem is that I saw interview somewhere in 2008 on youtube, which was stream from some american science tv channel a guy presenting (LIVE !!!) how light is used for giga internet speeds (wireless) so no, chinese didn't do shit except some cheap ripoff as they usually do this news is nothing new to world of tech

thanks guys

same, so many years of waiting where they wasted time for Fast'n Furious (stupid) sequels to get this dissapointing crap ... its sad

I'm bit rusty, but can XP (SP3) CD even reckognise SSD disks ? do they have driver for it ?

just watched Riddick (newest) oh my that one sucked terribly ... a bad clone of "Pitch Black", with terrible plot.

Scary Movie 5 (new one), and boy it sucked

VL cd/iso Pro version since activation servers will be down, and VL versions don't require it

heres the .evtx file, of "real error", which for some reason nirsoft's event viewer failed to show http://www67.zippyshare.com/v/38994283/file.html

<?xml version="1.0" ?> <event_list> <item> <record_number>114263</record_number> <log_type>System</log_type> <event_type>Error</event_type> <time>17.9.2013. 21:14:00</time> <source>EventLog</source> <category>0</category> <event_id>6008</event_id> <user_name></user_name> <computer>Barbossa-PC</computer> <event_data_length>64</event_data_length> <record_length>232</record_length> <event_description>The previous system shutdown at 19:30:24 on ?17.?9.?2013. was unexpected. </event_description> </item> </event_list>

grr I hate this new board... can't export in evtx, but heres txt export: ==================================================Record Number : 114263Log Type : SystemEvent Type : ErrorTime : 17.9.2013. 21:14:00Source : EventLogCategory : 0Event ID : 6008User Name : Computer : Barbossa-PCEvent Data Length : 64Record Length : 232Event Description : The previous system shutdown at 19:30:24 on ?17.?9.?2013. was unexpected. ==================================================The previous system shutdown at 19:30:24 on ?17.?9.?2013. was unexpected.Event Data:0000 DD 07 09 00 02 00 11 00 13 00 1E 00 18 00 C1 01 ................0010 DD 07 09 00 02 00 11 00 11 00 1E 00 18 00 C1 01 ................0020 3C 00 00 00 3C 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <...<...........0030 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ simple "power off" type of shut down, PC simply "dies" no beeps on next turn on, just the standard black screen of windows where you choose normal startup, safe boot etc...

its not that, my event ID is 6008 and its not restart, its complete shutdown

no i'm not, thats even rude to say Longhorn introduced few good things which IMO XP should have had

event viewer doesn't show anything except "unexpected shutdown" as for bios, how do I do that ?

no, I don't want to fight, I wanted merely point out that prefetcher being such agressive service (atleast in vista) can't be "light" (as given example above)

everything was cleaned 1 month ago and as told, this doesn't happen every 3 hours, but only 1st time after 3 hrs pass when I turn PC on, then it lasts ... 10 hours

I had a chance to see in certain shop of owners PC back then his machine had 16 GB RAM, and 12 GB of those 16 were FULL because of that prefetch are you telling me that reading those scattered 12 GB all over disk were low I/O ? how can it be low when it has to load it all on startup immediately ?

I have certain problem, this started to happen in last 5 weeks period my PC starts to turn off for no reason after 2-3 hours of working, and this happens only once per day when I turn it on 2nd time, it will run indefinitely so I suspect more on OS problem than hardware in control panel/power settings nothing is timered

it does speed up later, but my main point is: at what cost and time ?

so is XP faster than both so is 2000 faster than all 3 if you want to test NT 6, disable DWM and all its "new features", get it back to barebones as 2000 was then compare

I use Avira free always on win7, interface is crap, but scanner is great and its free... and you get frequent updates for free the problem you say of AV's that slow down machine is that you have to disable "active scanners", no matter of AV they all have this and they scan opened and downloaded files "on the go", so yeah this slows always everything

its useless on normal HDD too yes, goal is to load all crap you use frequent in RAM but to do that OS has to 1. index the stuff 2. constantly analyse and write data of (how they said) "your habits" 3. when it by some miracle finishes within a month it reads .sf files (think that was the extension)then within them sees path to real programsthen finally loads your programs into the RAMthis is waste of time, and waste of computer's work, while both vista and 7 do this job, youre better of defragment your HDD and normally run apps not to mention how superfetch slows down "boot to desktop" process as with case of fonts, OS needs to load this .pf list and normally biggest fail is when you restart/shutdown PC, all this cached RAM info is gone and process of loading all starts again at least to me, for any home user this is crap feature, for business and companies ok, they probably have PC on for weeks

so remove Norton then try without it theres obvious clash between the two