bphlpt

Jody, my post was meant for RacerBG. I kinda thought that was obvious with my post and the discussion immediately above it. I knew what your questions were. Cheers and Regards

I read that note as meaning that MS did something on the server side to fix the issue, not on the user side, but I could be wrong. Cheers and Regards

Try replacing your "onload" (for this case it's not needed), and "submit" functions with this and see if it gives you any ideas: //-> Body OnLoad Function -- not needed//-> Process Only Checked Checkboxesfunction submit() { for (var i = 0; i < cbo.length; i++) { if (cbo[i].value==null==false && cbo[i].checked) { try { Act.Run(cbo[i].value,1,true); } catch(e) { /*Error Code For Selected But Could Not Run*/; alert(cbo[i].value.replace("(+basepath+)",Act.CurrentDirectory)); } } } window.close();}

You might be recreating the wheel here. Search a bit, both here at MSFN and at WinCert for posts about autounattend by the user myselfidem and also check out his SetProductKey available in his signature. I'm not positive, but it might save you some work. [The lessons you have learned will be valuable, so no harm done. The time wasn't wasted.] Whatever you do, please post back with your progress and final solution so all can benefit from it. Cheers and Regards

Great! Who knows? You might be able to share something with harkaz that will help him in his project. If it does, then I would imagine that possibly even other folks working on projects for NT5 systems could also benefit such as user_hidden, OnePiece, 5eraph, Kurt_Aust, and maybe others. If it could be made possible to update all the NT5 systems, all versions and languages of Win2K, XP, XP64, 2003, etc, to be more functional and stable with today's software and hardware, then the whole community would be better for it. As you know, I've always been a supporter and fan of yours. Good luck! Cheers and Regards

OK I give up. What are you talking about then? Cheers and Regards

Sounds good. I assume you have checked with harkaz to see if he has come up with anything useful you might can use in new SP creation, methods, or tools? It seems you two have similar goals, just using a different OS. Cheers and Regards

No argument from me. As long as the newer versions don't add any features or compatibility or capabilities that you need. I wouldn't have thought that wGet would be guilty of inefficiencies like that, unless it's the fault of whatever they used to compile the newer versions? (MS VS 2013 vs earlier versions or whatever) Who knows. Cheers and Regards

Please do. Have you even tried anything? Read the Reference Guide? Started the program? Checked the "Application Addons" sub-forum? 4 times nope. I had extracted my drivers already from the devices which I have. Sorry. This is a volunteer forum. We are glad to help you and offer our advice based on our experience. But very few of us, and I am not one of them, have any interest in doing it for you. Do the four things Ponch suggested. Try to do it yourself. Tell us what happened vs what you expected to happen and we'll go from there. Cheers and Regards

@RacerBG, I understand you are avoiding Windows update and you feel that SP's are the only updates worth installing, but unless you are content with only using hardware and software that was officially supported by the OS+SP, you might have to change your stance. You can't be upset and complain when something doesn't work when there have been updates that fix issues which you refuse to apply, or when other software depends on those updates being in place. Cheers and Regards

Wasn't NoelC's response in post #944 sufficient to allow you to proceed? Cheers and Regards

Well, if you are going for the latest, then get the latest (or make a build yourself from the latest source). 1.11.4 is something like 2008, wget is at 1.15 now (dated TODAY), but there is a pre-made MInGW1.14 Win32 build here: https://code.google.com/p/osspack32/downloads/detail?name=wget-1.14.exe&can=2&q= Yes I was looking for one that was a Windows binary. Thanks for the 1.14. I hadn't looked for a while, but I don't know how I missed that one. Cheers and Regards

I guess I prefer to use the latest version I can find. Mine is the same as dencorso, 1.11.4. What is the reason for your focus on file size as your primary decision factor? For ease of use, I have also successfully used wGetGUI along with wGet, but sometimes nothing beats using wGet directly through command line. Cheers and Regards

@Outbreaker you will find it easier if you assign the current directory to a variable and then put the variable where you want it. Did you expect it to fill in the full path by itself? Dim objShell :Set objShell = CreateObject("Wscript.Shell")Dim strPath :strPath = objShell.CurrentDirectoryDim strConfig :strConfig = "\Settings\ProgramConfig.ini"Dim strINI :strINI = strPath & strConfig MsgBox (strINI)If the script is in "F:\OEM\RunOnce\Scripts\" then strINI will equal "F:\OEM\RunOnce\Settings\ProgramConfig.ini" And are you trying to use VBScript or JavaScript? The above is for VBScript, but similar logic applies to JavaScript. Cheers and Regards

Then use spolier tags, like this: but put in the entire file so we can make sure that there are no interactions. Blank out any keys, user names or passwords with xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx etc. Cheers and Regards

It still doesn't know what %CD% is. Cheers and Regards

It doesn't work that way because %CD% is not an Environment String. It is a Dynamic Variable, like %DATE% and %TIME%. VBS has ways to get the Current Directory just like it has ways to get Date and Time. You'll just have to do it a different way than the way you had planned. For example: Dim objShell :Set objShell = CreateObject("Wscript.Shell")Dim objFSO :Set objFSO = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject") Dim strFolderName :strFolderName = "."Dim strFullPath :strFullPath = objFSO.GetAbsolutePathName(strFolderName) Dim strPath :strPath = objShell.CurrentDirectory Dim strPath2 :strPath2 = Wscript.ScriptFullNameDim objFile :Set objFile = objFSO.GetFile(strPath2)Dim strFolder :strFolder = objFSO.GetParentFolderName(objFile) MsgBox (strFullPath & vbCRLF & strPath & vbCRLF & strFolder) In this case, strFullPath, strPath and strFolder will all be equal to the same thing, the path of the folder where the script resides. Cheers and Regards

Which version of wget is that? Just curious. Cheers and Regards

Send a PM to one of the moderators specifying the threads you wish to be merged. Cheers and Regards

At that link was this note: Which refutes several of the other posts in this thread about rumored possible extended support possibilities. Cheers and Regards

That's because you didn't supply much specific information. I probably don't either since I don't use gadgets. I've been TRYING to get you to provide enough information so that someone else who might know more than I do could help you. You also asked similar questions in the Win8 topics, so which is it? Are you trying to install in Win7 or Win8? And WHEN are you trying to do the install? Are you trying to install any other gadgets? Apparently, "you don't good understand my question" either. I'm through trying to get info from you. Good luck in you endeavors. Cheers and Regards

Well, you essentially have to do similar steps. Or you could check out some of the automated tools. such as Win Toolkit, that are able to make a Win7 AIO install source for you. Cheers and Regards

Sorry, no offense but I have no intention of downloading any app from someone's dropbox when I don't know that person without being able to read a whole lot more about the app. If you don't know where the home page is, where did you find out about it? Any write-up at all would be helpful. As to your gadget question, please read my response again. I have no idea if there is a "standard" switch, or even if there is one at all, to install gadgets silently. So what gadgets are you trying to install? And again, when are you trying to do this silent installation - on a running system or at OS install? It might make a difference. Cheers and Regards

That actually sounds like a logical approach, IF MS can succeed in appeasing folks with reasonable improvements in Win9. In my mind, if they effectively took Win7, added the underlying OS improvements from Win8 and any already planned for Win9, added the "Metro" Start Screen, apps, and Store as options, with the "Metro" apps able to run on the standard desktop as windowed apps, kind of like the old "gadgets" and improve them all so that if operated in full screen mode they would be touch screen friendly, then that might be a Win9 that folks would see as a reasonable upgrade, one that would be friendly to both new tablet users and desktops alike. But that's just my two cents. Cheers and Regards

-X- explained that TitoHL actually did more than what I originally thought. Based on -X-'s experience with similar intrusions on his site I do not blame him for his actions. In any case, -X- restored TitoHL's access, so all is good again. Cheers and Regards