j7n

So it seems to work again without resorting to the Safari HLS method despite showing an error "nsig extraction failed". It downloads anyway and in h.264 not in VP9. One positive from the Safari method is that it yields one video+audio file instead of two.

Takes ages for them to fix uncommon codecs like gapless playback in audio files, E-AC-3 glitch. If it was a project focused on one codec the maintainer would work on it or declare it abandoned. When you transcode you have to explicitly supply an output bit depth. And of course the sheer size that you don't need for audio transcoding (expected about 200-500K). Since they don't fix bugs (that I care about), and I don't need the new video codecs, old ffmpeg 7 works just fine for me.

I watched my first video in a couple days. This works. -f 96,96-0 --extractor-args "youtube:player_client=web_safari" Some of the formats are in other languages. I wonder how it works if it is an AI speech synthesizer and the author gives it the text, or if the voice is entirely supplied by the author which would be a lot of work.

Ffmpeg has grown to be absolutely ginormous. I remember how they used to have their own encoders for h.264 and h.262 with shared parts. The new encoders are far too slow, and more encoders keep getting invented. If I needed video, I would use x264 instead. Some people actively promote ffmpeg as a solution for all, but it kinda tries to be a jack of all trades and not the best. I don't see a use for ffmpeg for YouTube downloads. So what is new? How do we rip today? What numbers to use for Safari HLS?

What is going on on Euronews? I get a page full of unreadable plain "binary" text in New Moon. Is the website somehow appified and not HTML based anymore? https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/10/22/european-parliament-rebels-against-simplified-sustainability-requirements

I'll the Deno thing if there is a package for download that doesn't require much command-line wizardry. I can download sometimes today, but I don't know how to get the format number that always works. "96-12" only works sometimes. https://i.imgur.com/SWaCvoO.png

Today downloads give 403 Forbidden. I updated to the last version here. I can get something from Safari HLS, but the format numbers seem to not be always the same.

I have not witnessed the extremely poor quality again. A live 1920*1080 video with motion is now around 3700 kbit/s. It is still low but in the ballpark of what to expect online. zBq_krhKbW4 (static scene with a speaking person and illustrations) is about 850 kbit/s in "TV-S", and I perceive it as soft and washed out.

yt-dlp_win7.exe is the usual one. What is the advantage of using yt-dlp_win7.zip with extracted libraries to _internal? How long does it take to prepare more than a dozen builds for an update?

Since there now a separate, required build for Windows 7, can you please add a small link in the signature? So far no problems.

Those devices might work since there is no discrete sound card or other multimedia device, but might not given that there is no official Server available and they haven't had to proof their drivers for it. You can see how the block C000 0000 to E1FF FFFF (256+256+32 MB) is reserved for video in addition to others. There seem to be two video cards active.

Where does the kernel come from if Server R2 is only 64-bit?

That depends on the devices you have plugged into your computer. Like a video adapter might map around 300 MB to it. Other PCI cards get some. The consumers can be found in the device manager (View -> Resourced by type, Memory). So you can only get more memory by not having a good video card, which is not fun. There is no 32-bit Windows Server anymore, so that is not a possible path. It is either Windows NT 6.1 x64, or, Server 2003/2008 with PAE (not R2 but "Vista").

The SABR thing comes and goes. At the moment downloading works. I can't get anything from the safari HSL method from most videos using the format number that previously worked. I wonder how is it in Google's interest to maintain this multitude of formats. Imagine how many videos they have and now have to devote several times the storage space on their cloud. They could just have h.264 or 3 or so bitrates and it would work great.

I hear that you want to use the safari HLS. But what is the benefit of it? A backup when the tv client stops working? The file sizes I am getting are similar to normal download. But the numbers are all different. There is an entry for different languages (I don't know how that is possible when the video is in English). https://pastebin.com/RYrK840T

What formats/numbers are in the Safari HLS list? Are they better than what we get now?

It works again. And the command line keeps growing.

Google is throwing a new rock into the works. I am getting 403 Forbidden after 10 MB is downloaded with Win7 DLP (pee). "D:\apps\youtube-dl.exe" -f 299/137/298/136/22/bestvideo,140/bestaudio[language=en]/bestaudio --fixup never --restrict-filenames --no-check-certificate --hls-prefer-native -o "t:\working\%(title)s- %(id)s .%(ext)s" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdGH9jgSjkU

Had to update today because nothing was working at all, only a bunch of errors. Seems that the standard build from the signature of yt-dlp (pee) no longer works on Windows 2008 R2. I had to get the Windows 7 build. GetCPFileNameFromRegistry could not be located in the dynamic link library kernel32.dll

It is the end of New Moon for me. My bank (SEB Bank) designed an new "smart" payment form, which shows a blank area with some dialog shifted off screen to the right. This form lags even in Supermium. I would be lost without Supermium. https://i.imgur.com/kTBJjWj.png

Changing BIOS settings is not the same as "reflashing" the BIOS, which shouldn't be needed after changing the battery. Or does it now? Do most drives require AHCI? I've only found this with one drive that was extremely slow in compatibility mode (5 MB/s) because it didn't fully implement Ultra DMA.

I am using DLP 2025-08-20. SABR has gone away again for now and downloads work. It is not great that I need to wait some 10-20 seconds to see if download would start, but what can you do. I haven't seen very poor video quality again recently.

Video authors on the web often insert short clips from a feature film or a television programme, for example, the StarTrek guy facepalming, or a businessman saying to another that "plastics is the future" or the line saying "a few moments later" in a strange accent. This also sometimes happens on Facebook where a gif is added to the comments section. Sometimes the same clip is reused, but often we see new ones never before picked by this author. How do they find these? Surely they can't watch a whole film to find them while also producing their video in a timely fashion. Does there exist a database of these that they search?

I posted an example video above. It hasn't been reprocessed to increase the quality as of yet. All these new codecs serve for planned obsolescence when existing ones already work really well and over time become free as patents expire. Having video being double the size of audio is ridiculous. Usually it's something like 10:1 with compression.

Wrong thread! I intended to post about Supermium.