marxo

They are for you. Someone uses it maybe...

Nice... Who is the author? You or someone else...

Well 24-bit palette is "normal" but it still doesn't have alpha-channel so I don't think deleting rest of the icons would be a good move...

And it would be good for Win9x user community to get some new drivers (or improved old ones like i810 drivers)...

Well in case of VGA driver failure or something like that you will need them...

It is weird. I don't know what the problem is exactly...

Threads don't die until there is interest in them! Add that to board rules!

I know that you made it for yourself and it really looks good but I am just expressing my feelings and thoughts about non-OOBE stuff... Simply just a good thing that I wouldn't use because of my weird taste... I don't really want to discuss Lupus Project but I can say that it will be kinda Windows Me (basically) because I will have the same OS base and I will try to change some important parts so I will be able to re-brand it to my project name... I disagree about who ripped of who. I don't think it was a rip at all...

Well you have documentation there so you will probably be able to find everything you need about it in there...

Well Tihiy had a good idea about merging those two. Why bothering with 3rd party apps?

Why? What is wrong with getting some eye-candy at no ( or minimal ) resource loss?

I am just saying it is lame nothing else . Not this I mean any of those Mac OS X setup stuff (I saw few more, worse than this). This one is nice, but totally pointless because - U won't get that Mac OS X in the end... for example

Dude why are you making a OS X installer for XP ???

Windows Home Server should do too... I tested it and it is quite nice...

C:\WINDOWS\Resources\Themes\Luna\Shell\shellstyle.dll If you use Luna (Windows XP) then u will have to choose the type you have, Homestead, Metallic, NormalColor folder and there you will find shellstyle.dll

Yes i would because processes in 9x are way more expensive then in NT. Correction, LameSkin is exactly the same thing as msstyles only it lacks support for some parts that are skinned in uxtheme/msstyle engine. Only Tihiy didn't want to make a solution in one file so he left folders (maybe because it is easier to edit skins that way)...

Oh..... Oh..... Man! I just didn't see that... That is an amateur mistake man

It would be very long if I would describe every each of those particularly. Use Google or something. Sorry but it is really too long...

Well if you want details you would have to understand what APIs are, details about them. I don't have the nervs to explain what APIs are Then you would have to know little about PE structure or not just PE, maybe something about DLL structure, what is the difference between executable and dynamic library. I don't have the nervs to explain what those are Then you would have to know something about pe editing, what are msstyles, how are they edited. I don't have the nervs to explain what msstyles are There are lots of thing that you need to know before you ask why. And when you read all of that you won't ask why The biggest barrier for the understanding of this problem is understanding differences between 9x and NT systems and compatibility issues. When you see what huge differences between those systems are you will understand it a bit more...

I don't think he forgot that? Did he? If he did that would be an amateur mistake man....

damian I think you've found your spokesman Chris will handle all situations

The man said that is does pretty much what he wants. Converting him to NT* is not a solution to the problem nor it will ever be. His problem is that his PC probably doesn't support running W98 or W98 cannot work with some parts of his new PC. But Tbird885 it is mainly your mistake because there are lots of threads like this http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=101341 that can give u some valuable information about which hardware will not cause any trouble with W98.

As i said it is my vision of light and abstract aurora raids... Download @dA Preview:

Drivers from Vista x64 don't work? They should AFAIK because there is no mayor compatibility difference in the codes something like (Windows XP -> Windows 2k3)

Doesn't have to be that way... Maybe they will release it earlier that they have planed. It is just a M$ thing. They are very slow....