marxo

I don't think it has many bugs (if it has any)...

Well if you know what's inside the box and if you have the drivers for it, it is pretty easy. But the lack of Add Hardware Wizard and PnP is what makes NT4 so non-user friendly....

I tried making it work on NT4 and I wasn't successful. Did anyone try?

Dude... It's not true that it can't be done... It was made by people like me and you, which makes it possible. But it is difficult and I really don't think that someone is interested in doing that. asiekierka did a slip-stream he called SP6.5 it's in this forum somewhere...

To serve ( and protect your PC )...

You might tweak it visually too... I don't think anyone tried it... Also you could change it to display MBs instead of KBs in Mem Usage Tab...

assembler...

AFAIK this works only the first time you press ESC and second strike bypasses the logon screen...

I don't think that this is nice either. And you told him that he is childish?

It is a suicide mission...

What about 9x users? What do they use?

Great.. Maybe you'll be the first one to try this 32-bit icon support...

BenoitRen - It is pointless scaring them off they are multiplying rapidly. They are assimilating our people

Here they are: Windows NT4 USB Drivers I will also put them in Download Area at WPC

Eddie could you post more of that work?

You need Resource Hacker (maybe PE Explorer if you dislike ResHacker) and a graphic program like Photoshop...

But it isn't impossible to write dual-core processor support for 9x... Rewriting Windows is a fairy tale and it is not gonna happen soon...

I simply can't understand what you said or asked. It is simple: Use both Windows NT4 and W2K codes and do the **** thing (if you are able). There is no point in us repeating posts about the source code. Use the code u think that is better but IMO the only reasonable way to do this is to look at leaked source codes. Again I say, use the source code u think is the best.

I think that this is the easiest way to do it, if not the only one...

Would you mind me uploading those to a permanent link (without deleting...)?

even though it is a fraction of 15% of the actual final or complete source code? and whats wrong with the NT 4 source code then may i ask? AFAIK it is not only 15%. Well I suppose that both of them can do, but w2k is newer and stuff. Logically I thought that w2k would be a better solution...

Well w2k source would be helpful...

No you wouldn't, whatsoever we would appreciate that!

I don't know if you guys realize that this is the only thing that can help you with your dual-core stuff...

jaclaz Had some links about USB drivers u in post #2.