Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/14/2020 in all areas

  1. The greater evil is YouTube’s owner, Google. They are not in the habit of making things easy for Firefox, much less for developers of Firefox forks. As VistaLover pointed out on page 1 of this thread (which has not benefited much from subsequent expansion IMO), Firefox Quantum 63 or above supports Polymer v2 but UXP does not. If MCP thinks they can backport Polymer v2 support to UXP, then I wish them luck. For XP/Vista, Yandex 17 (or perhaps one of the Chinese Chromium backports) is the alternative.
    2 points
  2. .NET Framework 1.1 (2011-10-12) dotNetFx.exe NDP1.1sp1-KB867460-X86.exe NDP1.1sp1-KB971108-X86.exe <- W2K only NDP1.1sp1-KB2572067-X86.exe .NET Framework 2.0 (2011-10-13) NetFx20SP2_x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB958481-x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB971111-x86.exe <- W2K only NDP20SP2-KB976576-x86.exe <- same update as 982524 but for .NET 2.0 only (982524 is for both .NET 2.0 & .NET 3.5) NDP20SP2-KB979909-x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB2418241-x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB2518864-x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB2539631-x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB2572073-x86.exe
    1 point
  3. That's too bad, for I've seen examples of when Matt Tobin actually can be decent (the thread about finding permanent names for roytam1's browsers, for example). I think it's just that, for whatever reason, he seems to get impatient very easily and apparently has a bit of a temper. Even so, Seamonkey's email client is integrated within the browser suite, and it is nice to have it as a standalone program à la Thunderbird for those who don't want the whole SM suite just for the email client, so we can give him credit for that, if nothing else. Anyway, my main OS is macOS 10.13 from 2017 right now, and Polymer 2 is in no danger of being unsupported there. However, I do still dabble with NT5.x (and do occasionally use it as my primary OS, depending on need), so it'd be nice to have a browser there which supports it and isn't sponsored by either Google or the Chinese government (I don't trust Chrome or its China-based derivatives to respect any privacy settings whatever, at least not without extraordinary means; other Chromium-derived browsers (such as modern Opera) are probably OK, but none of those run on NT5 to my knowledge, so....). I dunno, maybe I'll give one of the Chinese chromiums a try, for they might not be as bad as I'm fearing they are w/re privacy (or maybe it's more easily manageable via HOSTS or other such tweaks than I'm thinking?). So to that end, which ones of the lot are most current and recommended? c
    1 point
  4. Rather Giving Matt Tobin credit for mail client , give it to Seamonkey team who made that stuff and matt just went out to port it to UXP
    1 point
  5. Hmm, I think someone touched a nerve there, their post was not in any way worded as a complaint, just a question! Reading between the lines, I suspect that the Pale Moon devs know they've got a real problem there, and their knee jerk reaction to a question about it was to become very defensive and dismissive.
    1 point
  6. You cannot, you write one. You can find examples and snippets, but invariably you will need to modify them to suit your needs, a few examples: https://cects.com/using-the-winrar-command-line-tools-in-windows/ https://cects.com/automate-compression-tasks-cli/ https://superuser.com/questions/371384/extract-all-zips-in-a-directory-incl-subfolders-with-a-bat-file-or-dos-comm It depends of course which "base" tool you want to use, 7-zip, RAR or - say - Peazip: https://www.peazip.org/peazip-free-archiver.html I had a look around and it does exist a Commercial tool that seemingly does what you want, but it isn't exactly cheap: https://www.powergrep.com/ and probably does too much. There is this free one: https://dngrep.github.io/ but it is .Net and Windows 7 up. jaclaz
    1 point
  7. You're welcome! And, BTW, <Alt><PrintScrn> (to get a snapshot of the currently active window only) also works.
    1 point
  8. Yep , and I believe that all tools capable of doing these searches use this or a very similar approach "under the hood", possibly they are faster, but the data needs anyway to be decompressed *somewhere* to be searched. jaclaz
    1 point
  9. The new list for .NET Framework 1.1 (2011-05-13) dotNetFx.exe NDP1.1sp1-KB867460-X86.exe NDP1.1sp1-KB971108-X86.exe - W2K only NDP1.1sp1-KB2416447-X86.exe (supersedes KB979906) The new list for .NET Framework 2.0 (2011-05-13) NetFx20SP2_x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB958481-x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB971111-x86.exe - W2K only NDP20SP2-KB976576-x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB979909-x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB982167-x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB2418241-x86.exe (supersedes KB976765) NDP20SP2-KB2446704-v2-x86.exe (supersedes KB983583, KB976569, KB974417) All of them can be processed by SNMsynth but in case of KB2446704-v2 you may have to remove the "-v2" as the filename is too long and results in a "file not found" error. As I'm using Windows 2000 I'm not really interested in making a current list of .NET 3.5 updates. Still it would be nice if someone else made an updated list for newer Frameworks
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...