Leaderboard

@VistaLover The posts about Comodo Antivirus were simply intended to inform Windows XP users that there is still a perfect alternative available. However, Comodo had not deemed it necessary to release an official, static link to the final installer for Windows XP/Vista when it discontinued support for these operating systems. Having learnt from my experience of reviving Malwarebytes Anti-Malware Free/Pro 1.75.0.1300 — regarding the updating of its definitions – I have drawn my own conclusions. I never make the same mistake twice. The Windows XP haters of this world will get no further fuel from me. I will do nothing that might prompt Comodo to pull the plug, as Malwarebytes did back then, even if my fix doesn't modify or patch any Comodo related files and only restores the state that the online update function was actually supposed to carry out. One thing is clear. A cursory search for this installer will get you presumably nowhere; you’ll need to dig a bit deeper in the case of Comodo. However, success is not guaranteed as Comodo generally replaces previous installers with more current ones. Whatever the rules may be. Very often installers are then still advertised to be compatible but they aren't any longer. If you can’t find anything, alternatively, you could make do with the installer of the previous version which is still available. The online update is not essential, as you can update Comodo's definitions offline at any time. The main programme and the VirusScope recognizer DLL files will no longer be updated online anyways, due to the change from SHA-1 to SHA-512 signature. These DLL files can only be updated manually by newer, compatible ones, if any are found, of course. I only restored the online update functionality to see, if it is possible, and due to the fact that I can do such things. It’s just the way I am. Regards, AstroSkipper

Update notification! Malware Hunter has been again updated on 20.07.2026 and is now available in version 1.219.0.863. It is still listed to be compatible with Windows XP. Accordingly, I will update my article to this version. Tests can be done by the users. Cheers, AstroSkipper

In addition to the previous article, I have updated all lists in the second, third and fourth post of this thread to the most recent facts.

How to secure Windows XP in 2026 - A multi-layered security strategy It is now July 2026. Since Panda Security – either unintentionally or perhaps deliberately – rendered its Panda Dome programme unusable on Windows XP from 2 July onwards due to faulty automatic updates, there are, in practical terms, hardly any anti-malware programmes with real-time protection left for this operating system supported by both programme and definition updates. Almost all well-known manufacturers of antivirus and antimalware programmes have discontinued support for Windows XP over the years. It is therefore of the utmost importance, first and foremost, to persuade Panda to correct its update routine on the server side. Windows XP enthusiasts can exert considerable influence here by reporting all issues with Panda Dome to the support team. Only if many people do this is there a realistic chance that anything might change in this regard yet. I really shouldn’t care, since I'm actually done with Panda. In any case, Windows XP users must realise that comprehensive security suites, as they used to be, practically no longer exist. System protection must therefore be organised differently. You have to build and organise it yourself using various tools that must work together harmoniously. Layer by layer, so to speak. What do you need for a secure Windows XP system? Windows XP SP3 with all essential components and available updates. Backup system: A fully functional backup system that regularly creates partition images. Firewall: A very good firewall that monitors all network traffic, including all incoming and outgoing connections, even those from Windows XP system components. Real-time protection: A programme that runs in memory, detects and reports threats. Process manager: Located in the taskbar. Startup manager: A good startup manager. On-demand scanners: One, or better still several, good on-demand scanners with a disinfection feature. Browser: An up-to-date browser with an ad blocker. Certificates: Up-to-date root certificates. And, of course, common sense. And if anyone now claims that this is impossible, I’ll respond directly: I’ve configured my Windows XP system exactly like this and haven’t had a single infection in 25 years. Windows XP is still my main operating system alongside Android. Cheers, AstroSkipper

Sorry for the delay in responding again. Nothing has changed since my last report, the program is working, with my folder exclusions applied, with only occasional stops and restarts of the main Panda service. I can live with that in the short term. I'm still hoping, of course, that a fix will be applied and it will all come good again. Nobody has any definite evidence that Panda have deliberately stopped their XP version from working properly, only speculation. I will wait a while and ring AnyTech365 again if I've heard nothing from them about this. They will be as anxious as I am to get an answer from the Panda developers about this, I'm sure, as they will need to be able to give accurate support information to anyone else asking about this problem! Assuming that they do have a direct channel of communication to them, and it would be pretty stupid if they didn't, hopefully it won't be too long a wait for an answer, one way or the other.

[HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\PolicyManager\current\YOUR-USER-SID\Connectivity] DisableCrossDeviceResume = (DWORD)1 DisableCrossDeviceResume_ProviderSet = (DWORD)1

By "any" I mean the below, with the bold ones being the most ominous, meaning the drive will fail soon, and from my personal observations with many disks, it dies within days/weeks. (not months) Raw Read Error Rate (may live longer with it, in contrast to write error rate) Spin Up Time Start/Stop Count Reallocated Sectors Count Seek Error Rate (always huge in Seagate) Power On Time Count Spin Retry Count Drive Calibration Retry Count Drive Power Cycle Count Power off Retract Cycle Count Load/Unload Cycle Count Disk Temperature Reallocation Event Count Current Pending Sector Count Off-Line Uncorrectable Sector Count Ultra ATA CRC Error Count (some small chance it could be the cable one bought for cheap) Write Error Rate And I'm not sorry anymore, if you insist.

I'm sure you wanted to say evolves, right? Well, it depends on the social circle, and varies from one state to another.

I'm sorry, I have to disagree, Hard disk Sentinel warns ahead of any failure, especially if we talk about Seagate (which one shouldn't purchase anyway, due to the high failure rate). From my observations, Seagate will fail within several days or weeks after HDD Sentinel showed its warning. One thing to point out, this software does not always know newest HDD models.

I speak only for myself, even if we leave aside your fears of Russian malicious activities inside the Kaspersky software, which do have some pretty solid base, with multiple warnings, like they say, "no smoke without fire". I'd still not use it. especially if we talk about the 19.0.0.1088 version, which is proven to have the infection CVE-2019-8286[62]. So not an option for any users, not only the XP ones. The source is solid, it's not like from a random internet guy. It's scientists. https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-8286

I knew Process Explorer 16.22 had no hostile IP connections, that's why I suggested it to you, enjoy, I'm glad you liked it! I also think you won't miss anything important, if don't update further. Wow! It's even more nonsensical! So you just post spam, is this how you entertain yourself? At least you got a bit of bravery to confirm your malicious activities.