Leaderboard

Good to hear. I use 55 myself, but I also keep a copy of 52 handy. The different names arose back in the early days. Originally Serpent was just a generic name used by "unbranded" builds of Basilisk; i.e., if you or I built the browser on our own PC, it would be called "Serpent" too. Basilisk was the "branded" name used for the official version distributed by MoonChild Productions. For several years the folks at MoonChild Productions expressed great irritation that some users sought support for @roytam1's Serpent builds at Basilisk's Web site (then run by MCP), so we were all taught to be careful never to refer to Roytam's builds as "Basilisk" and risk driving more Serpent users there.

Discover.com works with r3dfox as-is, so no SSUAO needed there. (Edge or Thorium users aren't so lucky; Discover seems to demand a quite recent Chromium engine. Supermium would probably do the trick but I haven't tried it.) I see several sites with this SSUAO: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 This works with chase.com as well. So I guess it was the r3dfox bit that it didn't like after all. Win 7 doesn't seem to bother it.

Darn! Seems the new release doesn't support tabs under the address bar (by using Zapp's Photon Theme). Still works with ESR 128.10. I wonder if something changed in core Firefox, but there are A LOT of different r3dFox options in Settings now. Edit: It appears that custom entries in about:config that are used by Zapp's Photon Theme are now ignored by ESR 128.12 rc GoodConscience wrote: on the Eclipse Forum: "This version of r3dfox isn't completely compatible with 128 ESR userChrome.css themes. You will need to replace instances of "(-moz-bool-pref: " with "-moz-pref(" for the theme to work correctly That did fix it.

New ESR releases for 128.12 (including a hotfix) ... yay! https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/releases/tag/v128.12.0rc-hotfix

Nvidia GTX 1050Ti will never work properly with XP.

Could there be strings attached?

We are looking forward to it! Will the Ungoogled patches be also applied?

To prove my point even further, a standard Android or iOS phone already includes the precise model in its UA. What else do they need!?!??! Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 13; SAMSUNG SM-A536B) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) SamsungBrowser/21.0 Chrome/110.0.5481.154 Mobile Safari/537.3 https://deviceatlas.com/blog/samsung-phones-user-agent-strings-list Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 15_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.1 Mobile/15E148 Safari/605.1 NAVER(inapp; search; 1000; 11.8.10; 12PROMAX) https://whatmyuseragent.com/platforms/ios/ios/15

How do I replace the white field with the iconic Feldrau colour? On Windows 7 or 8 without the Stuff Pck 1. Thanks!

The only example you gave is a website where the user has to register. You said: "...more and more sites...". So please list here examples of websites which appear unsecure in 360Chrome and do not need any registering! Thanks

What's good about this is that I always find time to smoke a cigarette and drink a cup of strong coffee or East Frisian tea.

Correct, compact characterisation. It looks like the browser world is about to shrink a little. At least for me. Chrome 127 is definitely the end for me. A browser like that has to be avoided. And there seem to be many users who feel the same way. The reason for this is, of course, manifest 3 and the associated restrictions on extensions, which are particularly tragic for content blockers like uBlock Origin. Personally, I'm happy to use New Moon 28, Serpent and Mypal 68 and will continue to do so for as long as possible.

There is no need to use ProxHTTPSProxy for all internet connections, even in Windows XP. Mypal 68, 360Chrome, Thorium, Supermium and all @roytam1's browser editions are capable of the TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols. However, the proxy is actually only needed for those programmes which are not capable of these protocols but need them in these days. Same applies to WU/MU, for example. Therefore, I use ProxHTTPSProxy only occasionally when really needed. And such cases happen, of course. Which sites do you need this proxy in 360Chrome for? Which sites appear to be unsafe for you in 360Chrme?

I found a German forum site where the same issue was reported under Windows XP long time ago: https://administrator.de/forum/win-xp-ereignis-id-3012-loadperf-16362.html Use an online translator! Maybe, the solution at the end of this thread works for you, too. Cheers, AstroSkipper

Extended kernel v3.0i BWC released, changes are as follows: -Fixed a bug that some components did not work when MSVCRT was changed to NT5 series. -Fixed the implementation omission of MFC90ESN.DLL. -Improvement of CoRevolkInitializeSpy / CoRegisterInitializeSpy function of OLE32.DLL -Replace MsgBox2K.exe with a modified version Link for Extended kernel v3.0i : http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/archives/1299806.html