Leaderboard

And this is what AstroSkipper gets when blocking the Canvas Fingerprint in Mypal 68:

Just for clarification, I do not and have not previously used Arkenfox user.js in Mypal 68 (or any other Firefox-based browser, Edge or Chrome which are all definitely off-topic here).

Jaw breaking success! @AstroSkipperis the first one to successfully fake and randomise the fingerprint in Firefox (Mypal68). This needs to be patented and saved in a dedicated topic, memorised for the future generations! Thank you for sharing, AstroSkipper!

But of course such hard settings break the functionality of many websites. That's why I usually prefer other settings.

Then it's strange you were not aware of this simple setting which is there for ages. privacy.resistFingerprinting

The extensions you use in Edge are not relevant to this topic. And you are wrong, canvas is very important, like @UCyborgwrote - it's even used by youtube.

Just as an illustration, see the printout of lightbeam (addon that shows the sites you visit, and the resources (cdn, fonts, etc) they take from the cloud. These are 200 pages/subpages I visit almost daily, for work and leisure (all mainstream). For my research I have similar pics in sp52. If you visit those sites without proper settings, the app will show not the neat balls you see below, but a bunch of interconnected meshes made of sites, and of the common resources they use to keep our attention. To avoid that interconnection means privacy. But that information remain in your isp, and the multiple cloud-spaces where (generic) you have most of your data, which makes that information a security issue. For that reason, site/tab isolation (containerization) is a must. And for that reason, you should use, if your hardware allows, multiprocess.

And this is what military experts like D.Draker get. Canvas toDataURL ×False Canvas Fingerprint Signature n/a Uniqueness n/a

I'll add: it's used by cloudfare and instagram uses Canvas toDataURL when uploading a photo. @Sampei.Nihira, canvas fingerprinting in a firefox based browser, this is what they talk about here.

I am interested in any news or discussions about Mypal 68. But at this point, I wonder what Edge browser settings or extensions have to do with a thread about Mypal 68. To be honest, such posts are simply offtopic. It would be easy to create a new thread for this if not yet present.

No, you didn't post the most interesting result with your canvas (which they discuss). https://browserleaks.com/canvas As for Webrtc, it's not interesting, it's achieved with any primitive extension or setting.

Iron 99 is not an option for Windows 2000, Windows Millenium, Windows 98, Windows 98SE, Windows 95, Windows 3.1.

Arkenfox stuff (including its precedents) has been around for more than a decade, I reckon. So has UB. Both work well in mypal68, provided you read with attention.

And this is what I get when faking the Canvas Fingerprint in Mypal 68:

Extensions, plenty of them. You can even pretend you're on win10 with its default set of fonts. Enjoy.

Unlike earlier versions of Supermium, the now-current version based on Chromium 119 does support “vanilla, unmodified Windows Vista” and is therefore on topic in this once-great thread: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v119 Thank You Win32!

I read several years ago, there were plans to make a 32bit kernel extension, it's not happening, right?

I've been meaning to ask, does supermium support custom themes?

Change Log "All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file: Upgraded the bundled Qt version to 6.6.1, based on Chromium..." https://qutebrowser.org/doc/changelog.html

The flag in 360Explorer is there. but turning it off doesn't prevent the HDD from spinning up. Addition, googled for about half an hour, no such oddity in the official 115 found.