Leaderboard

StartAllBack 3.4.3

Google is sending out the following notification: "On May 30, you may lose access to apps that are using less secure sign-in technology", to user of Outlooks older then 2019. Is there a a work around for this?

I released a new extended kernel. "FirefoxFix" and "SuperVerFix" are removed from osver.ini. You can use BuildNumber=7600 for Firefox instead, and use the regular version spoofing in other places too where those options would have been used previously. CPU-Z (and other hardware verification software) works again, as does PCSX2 (x86 versions; the newer x64 native builds are still a ways to go, due to reliance on DX 11.3 runtime) and some newer compilers/linkers should work too. A new installer is also used, which lacks the path issues of the previous one. It has a built-in backup facility, and the installer can restore backups from another OS install or a PE environment by specifying the path of the Windows directory of your Vista install. It can be obtained through all the known channels.

Really, @UCyborg, that's a double negative. Do you mean it "does work also?" Seriously though, I get the point. The Amwater.com site really wants you to use "modern" Windows or MacOS. I doubt even Win 7 will work for long, assuming it even works now! (Ironically, they don't recommend Edge as a "supported" browser....) It's like a reverse IQ test. If you use anything "too smart" you're blocked!

Ah; well, that explains it then. The site truly is an anti-XP (and Vista) bigot; you just chose to "pass" as Win 10. Probably not even realizing you needed to. Pray tell, how do you fake your display resolution, given that it's not part of the UA? Asking for a friend Seriously; faking a display resolution would help with browser fingerprinting, for those of us using Microsoft's VM. In full-screen mode, the display resolution is usually your monitor's resolution minus two rows. That "minus two rows" stands out like a sore thumb. I don't personally, but a lot of folks do. BTW, this is a great example of "hyper-resolution-itis;" a disease which inflicts many designers of smart phone and laptop screens these days: The compulsion to cram as many pixels as possible into as small a rectangle as possible. Come on, let's get real: no one can see the difference between 1280x720 and anything greater, on a screen the size of a typical smart phone, unless they're viewing the screen with a microscope! Even my old BlackBerry Priv (well, ca. 2015 is "old" when you're talking about smart phones) has a 2560x1440 screen! (I like the phone anyway.) But "4K" resolution lets the marketing guys brag: "You need our phone because we have more pixels than the other guys!!" And enough folks are stupid enough to fall for it, that the disease has become endemic.

Chill bro, you're not special with your Vista, I tried the following and it doesn't work neither. Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 But Linux x86_64 works. FreeBSD doesn't work either, regardless of bitness. There is more to this world than just Windows. Again, you guys aren't f****** special! But yeah, I agree with the premise, obviously the site is coded by a bunch of morons. BTW, I noticed Serpent has media.suspend-bkgnd-video.enabled set to false, maybe other roytam1's browsers as well. If you often leave videos playing in the background, you might want to turn this on to reduce CPU load as it won't process the video then, just the audio.

The first one will definitely be easier to add than the second. The second actually is implemented in ntoskrnl (in the official version), and there are a few ways of handling it differently. GetThreadErrorMode will be even easier to implement than either of those. And also, I found through a bit of experimentation that several of the functions are failing because the stub dll must be explicitly loaded into memory before it can be used. But the system procedures for verifying that the dll is available are quite lax. If the dll is missing altogether, it will give an error stating the function entry point is missing like usual. But if the dll is physically there but not loaded into memory, it "works" but as soon as you try calling the function, it fails due to a null pointer. So there will have to be some major adjustments to each (32 bit) DLL to confirm that the dll is loaded into memory beforehand. This issue did not seem apparent to me when testing started months ago and 32 bit applications like SeaMonkey started to work. I would have thought that whatever resolved the memory addresses for the functions would check to see that an available dll (as the name is available in the export table) was loaded before trying to call it.

do you count 3840px as "4K"? high-end SONY smartphones have 3840*1644 or 3840*2160 screens!

customize UI though https://github.com/Aris-t2/CustomCSSforFx/releases/tag/3.3.2

You probably mean this error: https://msfn.org/board/topic/181612-wip-windows-vista-extended-kernel/?do=findComment&comment=1217516 It's only present in prerelease versions of Firefox.

OE6 has stopped working. Has anyone checked if it works with two-step verification?

Asus Xonar has analogue inputs and its software runs on XP. Ordinary 3.5 mm jacks.

this time，succeed，thanks！