Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/18/2020 in all areas

  1. I'm not sure what "vast amount of info" you mean , win32 has confirmed that the kernel belongs to him , and I confirm that the drivers are fake , I tested them myself . He didn't do anything himself , except for tonns of misspellings.
    2 points
  2. Hello MSFN users. I decided to create an account here because when I'm searching for error messages and information about Windows I'm constantly running into this website. I do software development and and I test my programs on a variety of versions of Windows to ensure it works good on Windows.
    1 point
  3. Before ?! Then why didn't you tell us here ? I thought I was the first to discover. That person had written "This link will be of all my vista assets that includes a new kernel For Vista Users" . "my" .
    1 point
  4. Strange question . Did you actually read the page ? How am I supposed to know "who" he (or she) is ? I just found that page when I was looking for Intel Haswell HD Graphics drivers , by pure accident . And that person claims to have made them too , in addition to the "new kernel" , funny , huh ? ..... noooot . Actually it is stealing . Don't you wanna do something about it ? Oh , sorry , they "didn't kill you dog or smth" . Relax, I'm just joking. But I really think something needs to be done. @win32 and what do you think ?
    1 point
  5. Webgl on FX5100 - 5900, Radeon 9500 - x1250 webgl.force-enabled - true, webgl.disable-angle - true Intel Gma 910 - gma x3000 , Firefox 43.0.4 webgl.force-enabled - true Youtube and WebGL
    1 point
  6. Someone claims to have "a new kernel For Vista" . Beware , an advanced English ahead . https://steamcommunity.com/app/498240/discussions/0/143388132201481545/
    1 point
  7. hpwamr, Thank you for your warm welcome. InterLinked, Given what you mentioned about Windows NT you might be interested in what I'm doing. I am working on compiling open source software to run on older versions of Windows. For example I just got Rendera (a nice painting program) running on Windows NT 3.51. Also regarding why software doesn't support older versions of NT, sometimes its for silly reasons as in it's just one function, or even compiler used meaning that there is nothing wrong with the code, it's just that a new version of Visual Studio was used to compile it so it doesn't work on older versions of Windows. Other times it could be because the application really does need a lot of features only supported by older versions of Windows NT for example it uses a newer version of DirectX, in that case it would be very costly to get it running on older versions. With that said I do share your frustration and that's why I'm doing this. Dixel, I do have experience with Lua and embedding Lua in a C++ program however I've never programmed a game using Lua. You may want to look at https://love2d.org/ .
    1 point
  8. https://caniuse.com/webgl https://www.khronos.org/webgl/wiki/BlacklistsAndWhitelists If your GPU driver is blacklisted, you may try to force-enable webgl in the browser by toggling webgl.force-enabled;false and restarting the browser (depending on actual GPU, this may work or not, worst case scenario: the browser crashes upon launch - you'd have to restore that pref back to false by editing the prefs.js file in your profile...). It is needed by the mapbox API they're employing for displaying "Server Location"; as for actual deprecation, the Wikipedia entry for it is unclear about this; .. If you mean WebGL 1.0, well yes, this has been superseded by WebGL 2.0, but the latter is still being maintained, I think: https://www.khronos.org/news/tags/tag/webgl But then again, I'm not a gamer myself, so perhaps within the context of video games, the WebGL technology has been surpassed by newer APIs... That doesn't mean it's dead for simpler graphics tasks within a browser,,,
    1 point
  9. Pretty great once you've fixed it. It's not XP though which, at the time, was perfect (once SP2 came out).
    1 point
  10. There is no new firmware that is to be loaded to "fix" an issue, that is something one can do once (and only once) the drive has been revived to not hit the same issue again. The original issue (either the LBA0 or the BSY one) can happen because the firmware hangs/enters a no-exit loop when the event log hits 320 or a multiple of (320 + x*256), The procedure(s) reset this in such a way that - typically - the disk is fully functional for 3-6 months of use or more. Hence in there is the point "IMPORTANT" that says: If the drive doesn't work after the procedure(s) have been applied (or if it works intermittently as in your case) it simply means that it suffers from another problem that needs to be diagnosed, which requires specific knowledge (besides possibly specific tools ). There is somewhere on the thread a somewhat detailed list of commands that are available via serial, but most probably you need omething *like* SEDIV: http://www.hddgod.com/ and some training in using it. If you don't care about data on the drives, it is simply not worth the time/money/hassle. jaclaz
    1 point
  11. I tried it for you, installs and records just fine with Kernel Extension.
    1 point
  12. ... Wrong link there (to the test site itself!) Should've been: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=25830&p=205294 BTW, many thanks for raising this "there" (as you seem to be one of the very few that can coexist in both "camps" , without being given the "enemy agent" (and other, more derogatory) "accolade" by you know who... As the case is, @JustOff once more pinpointed correctly and swiftly the culprit ; too bad Moonchild (instigated by you know who) recently ostracised him from the core of the MCP devs... IMHO, he was the only one really sane person among them...
    1 point
  13. It depends. The connectors and rails are seemingly "normal" ones, but the overall power is on the low side, 305 W total, 150 W on 3.3/5 V and 264 W on 12 V is not that much. You need to calculate the power requirements of your motherboard+processor+other stuff, there are online calculator for this, examples: https://enermax.outervision.com/ https://www.asus.com/microsite/power_supply_calculator/ https://www.newegg.com/tools/power-supply-calculator/ The most complete/detailed should be: https://outervision.com/power-supply-calculator in "basic" mode should give you an idea, the "expert" mode is needed to have the details of the expected power requirements divided by voltage rails. jaclaz
    1 point
  14. I am offended that I was born at the wrong moment and at the wrong time. I want to see the internet from 2005-2009, I don't want to see the current situation with the unnecessary staff and dull interface. I want to see the complete openness of people on the Internet and their kindness to me. I want to see how Windows was made lovingly and stable, not 10, which is filled with surveillance and unnecessary services. I want to see the past of the internet and what it was like.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...