All Activity

Just wanted to report that SAB is running great on 11 LTSC 26120.670 (24H2) insiders.

Greetings. Faced with a problem related to DVI connection. It appears both in pure MS-DOS 6.22 and in the DOS window of Windows 98. I used different nVidia graphics cards and everywhere the picture is almost identical. Namely, when I set any resolution and refresh rate (640x480; 800x600; 1024x768), it is reset to native for my monitor, determined by the EDID for the DVI port. Monitor, any selected input resolution defines as 1600x900@60hz. Naturally, I would like to put something else. For example, 800x600@72hz. but the input is still the same 1600x900@60hz. When I connect via VGA, everything works correctly. What resolution and frequency I set - this is displayed. As far as I understand, the nVidia video card scales any outgoing resolution to native, if connected via DVI. Is it possible to somehow disable forced scaling under DOS\9x for DVI connection or somehow explicitly set the required mode?

All @heinoganda's, @Thomas S.'s, @cmalex's proxy versions and also my packages of ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu are based on whenever's ProxHTTPSProxyMII. All of them can be considered secure, of course. Or do you think I would offer here unsecure proxy packages?

For me it seems most of the issue is relating to Same Origin Policy/CORS and without looking too deep into things, it sounds like rather than provide a secure or compatibilty web interface, they instead will just show the message.

Yes, the Quadro FX 4500 (G70) works acceptably with 512MB of video memory on board, at least with ForceWare 77.72 drivers (and higher), but only after installing a special patch. For ForceWare 8X drivers.XX you will need the "PTCHNVSZ" package (By Rudolph R. Loew). With this package, you can fix the driver and/or the videobios so that it works correctly with this volume. It may also be necessary in other cases, as it contains several related fixes (FIXINTR, FIXEOI, Patch PCI.VxD) and other things that may be useful in some other cases (for more information, see MANUAL.TXT). For the most trouble-free 9x compatible ForceWare 77.72 driver, you can use a different patch (Created by analogy with "PCHNVSZ", but suitable for the 77.72 version of the driver): http://windows98.xf.cz/index.htm#NV7722PATCHED I use a combination of these two options - "FIXEOI" and "PATCHOPT" from the "PCHNVSZ" package + the corrected NVCORE.VxD (From the link above), together with the ForceWare 77.72 driver (The latest version with which D3D\DirectDraw still works without problems). And also nvOpenGl.DLL from version 71.84 (As newer ones caused problems in OpenGL). And MTRR correction (Without which the speed of some indicators in 2D and under DOS on PCI-E cards is extremely low). For G71 PCI-E, you will need at least ForceWare 8X. XX (With which there are a lot of still unresolved problems, in particular, with D3D\DDRAW). 77.72 doesn't have these issues yet.

It detects something like 128Mb or so. Like XP detects only approx. 2Gb out of 6GB GPU.

That should be the developer, right? https://github.com/wheever/ProxHTTPSProxyMII Do you always use the proxy, or only occasionally? Do you trust it?

Some reported success with RTX3080, so if you still can return that notebook and replace it, perhaps worth a try, but then again, no 100% guarantees.

No drivers for Windows 7/8/8_and_a_half exist.

It's a new feature to reduce fingerprinting by the means of serial ports.

Which developer do you mean? Please, be a bit more precise! If you mean the extension developer, I assume he warns the user not to misconfigure the Proxy Switcher extension and not to use unsecure web proxies. Which proxy do you mean? If you mean ProxHTTPSProxy, this local proxy is as secure as Windows XP and direct connection is.

Doesn't detect serial ports on XP.

You can shorten it a little: if (shExpMatch(host, "*.example.com")|shExpMatch(host, "*.google.*")|shExpMatch(host, "*.wetter.com")) { But it is very confusing. However, I have noticed that it sometimes causes problems if the website integrates external content that does not have SSL. In this case, the external website must also be recorded. I'm thinking about running all pages via the proxy after all :-) However, the following sentence from the developer unsettles me: Be aware and careful! Use a direct connection when you don't want any mistakes made. Is the proxy not secure, or what does this mean?

64-bit version of PuTTY 0.81 needs hex editing to get running on XP x64 as minimum OS version specified in the PE header is 6.0 (Vista) instead of 5.2 (XP x64 / Server 2003).

I had to create for each domain a separate, new IF query otherwise it wouldn't have worked in my installation.

https://www.ghacks.net/2024/05/21/microsoft-announces-copilot-pcs-and-ai-powered-recall-feature/ If this is to be the future, I prefer to take refuge in Linux. I have used Linux in the past but it bored me. My daughter in middle school (2005) had a Linux PC prepared by me I don't remember the distro but it was almost certainly Ubuntu. She had many compatibility problems compared to other students. So this experiment was short-lived,if I remember correctly about 2 years. I have also used other distros,and now I really have no idea which one is best suited for my PC. Which could be upgraded to Windows 11.....but I still haven't decided whether to do this upgrade.

Yes, that is the problem. With "*." all third-level domains are recorded. Can several different domains be entered in the IF query, or do I have to make a separate query for each domain?

@Anbima didn't say anything about that. If one doesn't make clear announcements, one can't expect to get exactly the information one needs. We are not clairvoyants. If the PAC script contains a different URL than the one you want to call up, you don't have to be surprised that it doesn't work.

Hi, I want to purchase two licenses, one for my personal desktop and one for a work laptop. However it appears that the minimum business purchase is for ten licenses. As I only require one this model is not appropriate to me. Please advise.

On the insider's 26212 everything is fine too, including the classic taskbar.

I was wondering if I can successfully install windows 7 on an Acer nitro V with mostly all the drivers fully functioning I’ve gotten it to install partially in the past but it locks up on “starting windows” after first reboot and first boot off the m.2 Specs: Intel Core i5-12500H 3.10Ghz 12th Gen 12 Cores Alder Lake Intel Iris Xe Graphics 128MB BIOS VRAM 8129MB Total VRAM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU 4096MB OS: 1TB M.2 SSD WD Green Backup: 1.92TB SATA Lexar SSD 16GB DDR4 (2x 8GB DDR4) Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX16501 160MHz Realtek HD Audio

I actually think what he's trying to do is for one.example.com two.example.com three.example.com www.example.com and what you are proposing will only work for example.com

Yeah. I upgraded to non-Insider 26100. So far I'm finding it very stable and SAB is working.

Any idea why the modern tooltips are not applied when opening an app (PotPlayer) from shell/context menu? Running the app by double clicking the exe Running the app from shell/context menu

For me. it works as it should. No. No green. Just insert the PAC script code! You won't get any confirmation messages. I really don't know what you are doing. All a bit strange. "example.com" is completely sufficient and exactly corresponds to the URL which you wanted to load.