All Activity
- Past hour
-
KB2839299_2003 derived fltMgr upgrade that it is not...
MilkChan replied to modnar's topic in Windows XP
info here It states that : Sometimes Microsoft released builds referred to as “Escrow”. Escrow means the development of a branch gets stopped and the code is being tested. If Microsoft or its testers don’t discover any serious bugs (“showstoppers”), the current build becomes the final milestone (usually RC or RTM, but sometimes there are also beta escrow builds). Escrow builds are usually handed out to TAP (Technology Adoption Program) testers, ISVs, IHVs, etc. http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/01/10/what-does-idsidw-mean-and-what-are-escrow-builds/ -
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
jumper replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
. -
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
jumper replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
9.0.289 requires a CPU with SSE support. 9.0.47 and 10+ don't, but 10+ requires XP. FineSSE29 solves the SSE problem on Win9x, but hasn't been tested with NT4. -
KB2839299_2003 derived fltMgr upgrade that it is not...
Multibooter replied to modnar's topic in Windows XP
Thanks for mentioning fltmgr.sys build 6750/KB4493563 in your posts. Build 6750 works OK on my SSE-only Inspiron 7500. The Properties sheet of fltmgr.sys indicates as File Version: 5.2.3790.6750 (srv03_sp2_qfe_escrow.190315-1901), no idea what "escrow" specifically refers to. On my Inspiron 7500 with a Pentium IIi ["SSE-only" = Non-SSE2] I have tested/run OK the following versions of fltmgr.sys: - MS fltmgr.sys v5.1.2600.2180 (WinXP SP2 32bit, 4Aug2004-19Jan2005) - MS fltmgr.sys v5.1.2600.5512 (WinXP SP3 32bit, 13Apr2008) - MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.3959 (Win2003 SP2 32bit, 17Feb2007) - MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.5107 (KB2839229, 7Jan2013) - MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.6750 (KB4493563, 16Mar2019) - MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.6912 (KB4512787, 11Jul2019) The above versions of fltmgr.sys work under both Non-SSE2 and SSE2. I don't use a special installer, just a file-copy after booting into another operating system. Are any additional registry entries necessary? Builds 5512, 5107, 6750 and 6912 seem to work OK under WinXP SP3. "MS fltmgr.sys v5.1.2600.2180 (WinXP SP2 32bit, 4Aug2004-19Jan2005)" is a leftover on my Inspiron 7500 in \$ntservicepackuninstall$\, after the upgrade from WinXP SP2 to SP3. Its timestamp is 4Aug2004 and its file modificaton date is 19Jan2005. The big question now is: which build is the best for WinXP SP3? - Today
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
roytam1 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Notice: upstream pushed a big ICU update, and I may need to further look at the changes to see if any new changes are needed for our old target platforms, currently no ETA for upcoming new builds. -
KB2839299_2003 derived fltMgr upgrade that it is not...
MilkChan replied to modnar's topic in Windows XP
me have some knowledge of modifying Microsoft installer files. I've modified the update.inf file to a single file and removed files from Server 2003, except for fltmgr.sys, because it contains necessary registry entries. https://mega.nz/folder/noJVCRzL#VByCvDGgf7Y4EGTR4f-bmQ -
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
Leokids123 replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
I use English,and it well,it doesn't crash for me. -
https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/15325 (for reference: https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/14923 )
-
Yes, this pertains to readyboot, not ready boost. Ok, I've unchecked the trace session enabled checkbox. What exactly will I lose by not enabling it? I rarely shut down my laptop. I just close the lid and it I guess goes to sleep or something. I open the lid and everything comes back up. Does any of that involve this "readyboot" thing?
-
I've just fired up an old XP PC and have updated the windows root and intermediate certificates but my question is - how does firefox interact with these certs? The PC has FF 39.0 and is throwing up cert errors when I bring up some sites. Does FF use these windows certs, or does it have it's own store? If it has it's own store, is it built into the distribution image when you install it? Can you have FF just update it's own certs without having to update FF itself? Are there cert update packages for FF? Or will it take the windows cert files? (On my win-98 pc at work, running that modded version of FF2, I never have cert issues and I throw a lot of sites at FF, usually have to view them with no style, but they still come up)
-
Looking for IntelliType Pro 1.2 Standalone Installer for Windows Me
ABCDEFG replied to iMic's topic in Windows 9x/ME
I found the Italian version. https://web.archive.org/web/20010810133157/http://msvaus.www.conxion.com:80/download/internkeybdpro/Install/1.2/WinMe/it/itp12ita.EXE and english version of Intelli Point/Type 1.1 https://web.archive.org/web/20040410203216/http://download.microsoft.com/download/internkeybdpro/install/1.1/win98/en-us/itproeng.exe The links for the English version of 1.2 are dead unfortunately. https://web.archive.org/web/20000817033821/http://www.microsoft.com/KEYBOARD/download/pc/install_1.2.htm https://web.archive.org/web/20011117165248*/http://download.microsoft.com:80/download/internkeybdpro/Install/1.2/WinMe/en-us/itp12eng.EXE Version 2.22 should work in win me because it works in win98 https://web.archive.org/web/20050712143156/http://download.microsoft.com/download/3/1/b/31b2ffcf-39b2-4f09-9540-f2d830b50930/ITP2_22EngALLMsi.exe - Yesterday
-
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
reboot12 replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
@Leokids123 I use Polish version WinNT 4.0 You use English right? How force install English SP6a on Polish OS ? I found this: http://dd.bigserwis.pl/updates/WinNT4/NT4 Service Pack 6 pl/Sp6i386pl.exe Exactly same CRC-32: e4ad7cdd -
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
Leokids123 replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
That's because it's the same thing as SP6 except revised,but can you check the winver? If it says Service Pack 6a instead of the Revised one,then you must get english one,That one worked for me... -
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
reboot12 replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
This is english version. I want Polish: I found this: https://archive.org/download/WinNT4.0Workstation_SP6aPOL/WinNT4.0_Workstation_SP1_OEM_Update_SP6a_Polish.iso/SP6A%2FSP6A-PL-I386.EXE but is exactly same as mine: CRC-32: e4ad7cdd -
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
Leokids123 replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
https://archive.org/download/WinNT40SP6aISOEXE/sp6ai386.exe -
KB2839299_2003 derived fltMgr upgrade that it is not...
Multibooter replied to modnar's topic in Windows XP
I have now installed fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.6912 (11Jul2019) on my old 700MHz Inspiron 7500 under WinXP SP3, and everything works fine. Browsers with this old, slow laptop work MUCH less sluggishly under WinXP SP3 than with the original WinXP SP3 build 5512 when JavaScript is turned. I have made this posting with New Moon with fltmgr.sys build 6912 on this old laptop under WinXP SP3, which has now become much more useable. Thanks! Identical versions of fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.6912 (11Jul2019) are contained in KB4512787 and KB4512788. I have not yet decided between the two builds 5107 and 6912 for WinXP. For now I will keep build 6912 installed under WinXP, to see whether any issues come up. -
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
reboot12 replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
Where to download Revised SP6a Polish? What is the name of the file with this service pack? I use this SP6I386.EXE CRC32: E4AD7CDD -
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
Leokids123 replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
I've downloaded the SP6a that has this revised SP6a,which fixes a bug regrading SP6. You probably got the wrong SP6a... -
I've been using the Registry Tweak posted by GrofLuigi to completely disable it since the Windows 7 era and didn't have any problems with that feature after that. From when I last tested, it still works up to Windows 11. To configure manually : Go to the Control Panel ->Administrative Tools ->Computer Management ->In the left panel, open Performance Monitor -> open the "Data Collection Sets" and click on "Startup Event Trace Sessions" -> In the right panel, double-click on "Readyboot" -> In the "Trace Session" tab, you can now uncheck the "Enabled" checkbox As an alternative, you can also set the Maximum Filesize of the Log File to 0 in these setttings (in the "Stop Condition" tab) if you dont want to completely disable the ReadyBoot Service itself.
-
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
reboot12 replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
What is Revised version ??? I have only Service Pack 6a: https://ibb.co/RkX7N2pJ -
KB2839299_2003 derived fltMgr upgrade that it is not...
modnar replied to modnar's topic in Windows XP
Exactly! I'm glad you noticed the difference! That is how much filter manager is important for the system (it's a tree that all mini-filters are branches of) and bloody Microsoft scum put such pile of horse manure into WindowsXP_SP3!!! Outrageous! I'm superglad it works out for you. I'm glad it works well for you too! It's such an important part of the system and really can make a difference. I just don't know how on my multi core and multi partition and multi disk system it can't work right... Sigh. -
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
Leokids123 replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
-
KB2839299_2003 derived fltMgr upgrade that it is not...
MilkChan replied to modnar's topic in Windows XP
KB3045999 There's also fltmgr.sys same version 5.2.3790.5107 (srv03_sp2_qfe.130106-1434) I installed it today as I specified, and saw the difference compared to Windows XP before the update file. It's as you said, but didn't have any problems with the ESU Update version KB4493563. -
Can't. I am in the middle of replacing my 17/18yr old Core2 Quad Q6700 computer with my new gift-to-self (take advantage of seasonal sale pricing). A screaming fast (compared to everything else I have) Intel Core Ultra 7 265. And no, sorry to say, but Supermium will *never* be used on this new computer, sorry, it just isn't. From memory, without screencapping, it's any-and-all input dropdown boxes in the GUI. Text inside the input dropdown is shifted to the left and half of the first letter is not present, buried by the input field border/padding. To be fair, the Supermium I had on the Quad Q6700 "might" have been a version old, not the most recent.