March 1, 200719 yr ok guys...since now Retail/RTM versions are out now...i m starting a new topic for System Rating of your PC Generated By Vista....Remember this time only post scores of your RTM ( final release ) version..not any RC or Beta releases...Plz also write a little note about your overclocked settings if you have overclocked your system...it will be best if you post both ratings...i mean for Default clock of your CPU and Overclocked settings...Good Luck! Here is mine..Overclocked - [ AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 2.0 GHz to 2.7 GHz ]Default clock - [AMD Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2.0 GHz ]Same score as above..only Processor score is 3.9any suggetions to improve this topic will be appreciated.ThnxAMIT
March 1, 200719 yr How do I save my score as a .jpg to post?I've tried to rightclick & highlight to save what I see to no avail.
March 1, 200719 yr How do I save my score as a .jpg to post?I've tried to rightclick & highlight to save what I see to no avail.Use Print Screen / Prt Scr button and paste into Paint & save as *.jpg or whatever U want...Sorry to say, I m using RC2.I m also using AMD Athlon64 3200+ @2.0GHz and it scores 4.0
March 3, 200719 yr How do I save my score as a .jpg to post?I've tried to rightclick & highlight to save what I see to no avail.Thanks, here's my score on an HP dv9225, AMD 2.0 GHZ, 2 gig of RAM, nVidia GeForce Go 7600 256 MB video running Vista Ultimate 64 bit:
March 5, 200719 yr Wow Amd then had done a greater job than Intel, my intel 1.86 duo core 2 with 4GB's of ram and 512 memory of ATi radeon only gave me a 4.1 compared to the 4.6 that "ButchN's" PC got. interesting to c
March 6, 200719 yr OK, I have an AMD Opteron 185 (2.6Mhz) overclocked to 3.15 with watercooling, it goes to 2.99 stable with air and stock voltage. Running 2GB Corsair mem, ATI X1950 pro, Sata 1 RAID 0. It's funny because it gives me the same scores no matter if I'm at stock or OCd.Score of 5.5 with the proc being the slowest. 5.9 on RAID and GPU. This is off and old Asus AV8 AGP with X1950 AGP. Memory is 3200, 184 pin DDR 400 running at 333 becuase all memslots on MB are filled. Edited March 6, 200719 yr by ssgatbliss
March 6, 200719 yr Here's mine....Had this PC together for about a month now.... Edited March 6, 200719 yr by jmjm003
March 6, 200719 yr If only I could afford a faster processor... If I were running raid hard disk would easily be 5.9...And ssgatbliss, please re-upload your entire picture, I would like to see that please.... Edited March 6, 200719 yr by war59312
March 6, 200719 yr My laptop is not very good, but seems happy with vista.Processor - 4.6Memory (RAM) - 4.5Graphics - 3.1Gaming Graphics - 3.1Primary HD - 4.7Spec: Intel Core Duo T2250, 160GB HD, 1GB Ram, Intel 945 onboard graphics.My HTPC is much betterProcessor - 4.2Memory - 4.9Graphics - 5.9Gaming Graphics - 4.6Primary HD - 5.2Spec : Pentium 4 3.0GHZ hyperthreading, 2GB Ram, 160GB SATA, Geforce 7600GS AGP graphics.
March 7, 200719 yr Toshiba A100 laptop intel core 2 duo 1.6ghz, 1 gig ram, 80gb hdd my pc gets a 4.5 which is a athlon 3800+ x2 64bit, 1 gig ram, geforce 7900gs, sata 2 160 gb hddEDIT:Not over clocked Edited March 7, 200719 yr by Drakx
March 8, 200719 yr So does anyone know if these #'s actually mean anything?I mean, what is good & what is "bad"?
Create an account or sign in to comment