michael_25cm Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 How many SPs are there and do I need install all of them?
K_O_ Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 I've noticed that the Service Pack 3 files are creeping through with someupdates though so their's definately one on it's way...
cluberti Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 We generally call updates that are released post-service pack as labeled as the next service pack's files. For instance, you can find security updates for Windows 2000 that are listed as SP5, even though there never was an SP5 (even after the post-SP4 rollup). It's nonclemature, and makes tracking patches easier (amongst other things). While I think there's likely to be an SP3 for XP in late '07 or into '08, I'm not betting the farm on it either now that Vista is RTM .
Lost Soul Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 I've noticed that the Service Pack 3 files are creeping through with someupdates though so their's definately one on it's way...thats a fake, sp3 wont be out until around 2008
Jeremy Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 thats a fake, sp3 wont be out until around 2008If at all.
K_O_ Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 (edited) I've noticed that the Service Pack 3 files are creeping through with someupdates though so their's definately one on it's way...thats a fake, sp3 wont be out until around 2008It's not fake, i'll post the file here for you to download...Run the sigverif program on your system & validate for yourself thatthe file IS indeed digitally signed by Microsoft..There you go smart guy, DOWNLOAD & check it yourself with sigverif..Tell me it's a fake now..& I never said it was Sp3, just that Sp3 files are creeping throughwith updates, think about it... Edited December 1, 2006 by K_O_
Jeremy Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 K_O_, take a chill pill. No one is calling you a liar, try not to interpret things so harshly. It's not official from Microsoft and things can be and have been faked before.
IcemanND Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 the patches since SP2 have resource dll's in them that are labeled SP3. You can check the registry for the installed date of hotfixes they are listed under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Updates\Windows XP\SP3\Last I heard SP3 was not being released until the end of next year.
footballking3420 Posted December 2, 2006 Posted December 2, 2006 (edited) Service Pack 3 won't be released at all from what I've read. It kept getting pushed back further and further. [ No, that's against the rules. ] Edited December 2, 2006 by gamehead200
Puggsley Posted December 2, 2006 Posted December 2, 2006 Most updated files since sp2 have been tagged as sp3 because when it is released they will be included.
bledd Posted December 2, 2006 Posted December 2, 2006 I've noticed that the Service Pack 3 files are creeping through with someupdates though so their's definately one on it's way...thats a fake, sp3 wont be out until around 2008check system32 folder you probably have this 'fake' file too
gamehead200 Posted December 2, 2006 Posted December 2, 2006 I've noticed that the Service Pack 3 files are creeping through with someupdates though so their's definately one on it's way...thats a fake, sp3 wont be out until around 2008check system32 folder you probably have this 'fake' file too None of you seem to have read the entire thread.We generally call updates that are released post-service pack as labeled as the next service pack's files. For instance, you can find security updates for Windows 2000 that are listed as SP5, even though there never was an SP5 (even after the post-SP4 rollup). It's nonclemature, and makes tracking patches easier (amongst other things). While I think there's likely to be an SP3 for XP in late '07 or into '08, I'm not betting the farm on it either now that Vista is RTMI have the same file. It is NOT fake.
Jeremy Posted December 2, 2006 Posted December 2, 2006 None of you seem to have read the entire thread.Hehehe, I was wondering why Bledd made that response when Cluberti's post was not too far up the page. It's not fake and it's explained right there. But it's not like I really needed to say that, right?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now