alsiladka Posted February 9, 2006 Posted February 9, 2006 7 caused so many probs while burning , switched back to 6.BTW , should not this thread be in the SOftwares hangout?
sonu27 Posted March 6, 2006 Author Posted March 6, 2006 6 is the place to be, but there is a new version of 7 out.
hbinded Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 I tried version 7, but it keeps on messing my CD's, so I'm back to ver. 6
convict Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 I user nero 6. I always seem to have used nero for burning dvds. I use alcohol120 to burn disk images. But my nero 6 has lightscribe built into it so I kind of have to use that. I tried nero 7 with no lightscribe options.
Biohead Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 Use Nero 7 - yeh it's full of bloat but it's never burnt me a coaster. Plus i'm too lazy to go back down to 6, i'm used to 7 now.
Scubar Posted May 12, 2006 Posted May 12, 2006 I have found both Sateira CD&DVD to be extremely good also NCH Swift Sound make alot of very good programs. Both companies make extremely small and very efficient programs. I now use Sateira as part of my PE because they are single.exes and do everything i need.
Thunderbolt 2864 Posted May 23, 2006 Posted May 23, 2006 I liked Nero 6, been using it for a while now. The first Nero 7 just messed up my CDs, so I switched back to Nero 6. The last update of Nero 6 was terrible, the stupid window wouldn't close when I finished burning something, so now I'm using Nero 7 again. And I haven't encountered any problems yet.
Hatefulsorrow Posted May 23, 2006 Posted May 23, 2006 I use Nero 6 Portable. Very lite. Only 17 MB and doesnt require an install. It was origanally designed for use off a thumb drive but works very well for a UI. It doesnt have any extras, just the burning app and iso features. No wave editing or start smart, ect.
jbjones Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 (edited) I started with Nero 5.5 and then moved to Nero 6. However, I have also been disapointed at the continuous crap Nero keeps adding to their nice burning application. The worst part being that it installs everything and creates a bunch of unwanted file associations. I even wrote Nero a complaint about that to which they responded that come customers liked the extra features so it would be unfair to them to remove them. Yeah right! I have yet to meet someone who uses the Nero media apps. Seems to me that 90% ("most") of their customers buy Nero for the burning. Some stupid marketing decision going on somewhere up there. In fact that reminds me of a recent article from John C. Dvorak on Creeping Featurism. Smart guy. I never cease to be amused by his articles.Anyway. I guess from now on I'll be going for the free simple apps like CDBurnerXP Pro. Edited June 16, 2006 by jbjones
Guest WebMadman Posted July 9, 2006 Posted July 9, 2006 (edited) Nero 6316 Ultra Edition and ImgBurn... Edited July 9, 2006 by WebMadman
Former Big Iron Guy Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 I went to Nero 5 when it came OEM'd with personal external CD reader burners. Liked it lots better than CD Creator 4 & then 5 that the company had on my company laptop. Was happy, mostly when I went to the DVD burner with 6 OEM. then the DL burner with Lightscribe when I bought the full 6 package and then upgraded to 6.6,xxx. I looked at the bloat and such with Nero 7, 8 and 9, and I'll stay at 6.6 until I can't do something with it, on a consistent basis.I also use ISO Buster for the more esoteric things that are easier that way.I just wish the mfg's would realize that if it is a pig, you can dress it up and put lipstick on it, but it is still a pig. <Semi-Rant state=on>The only difference in the word processing and spreadsheet stuff I do now, as opposed to what I did in the 8 bit era is that I have faster printers (laser and inkjet) as opposed to daisy wheel and dot matrix, so I get prettier and faster output. The basics are the same..... The price sure isn't, and the total feature set has mushroomed and ballooned well beyond *all* reasonable expectations. (Blame marketing!). In some ways, I could do as much or more with my 64K 4Mhz CP/M machine than I can with my 2.66GHz 4GB XP Pro box. Sure didn't need to have *all* those seldom or never used features added to the mix......<Semi-Rant state=off>I don't need all those fancy bells and whistles added in. If I want to do some of the stuff Nero thinks I should do, instead I pull out the real thing like Adobe Premier......-F.B.I.G.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now