boooggy Posted June 25, 2005 Posted June 25, 2005 i say 10 is a little better cause it has mp3 encoder .
XPero Posted June 25, 2005 Posted June 25, 2005 10 for me:- MP3 encoder- Better GUI- Media library has been improved "for those who live in the media lybrary" (like me)
atomizer Posted June 25, 2005 Posted June 25, 2005 can't stand either (bloatware/spyware/lousy security).Media Player Classic
Scubar Posted June 26, 2005 Posted June 26, 2005 Agreed with atomizer both very lousy products, and both extremely annoying by adding 50000000 entries in the context menus. grrrr
Lost Soul Posted June 26, 2005 Posted June 26, 2005 i say wmp 10 is better then 9,, but id rather use winamp
Jeremy Posted June 26, 2005 Posted June 26, 2005 can't stand either (bloatware/spyware/lousy security).Media Player Classic<{POST_SNAPBACK}>I second that.
Jeremy Posted June 27, 2005 Posted June 27, 2005 But can you manage 20GB of music with mpc?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>I don't use MPC for music. I use 1By1. Purely MP3 for me. Anyway, I see you're referring to WMP's ability to "catalog" all kinds of music. If you like all that extra functionality, power to you. I don't give a crap about different solumns listing the length, bitrate, genre, date of modification, etc. As long as it plays my music when I double click the file, that's terrific. Cheers.
suryad Posted July 1, 2005 Posted July 1, 2005 I use WMP 10 for HD content. Also to use for divx, xvid movies. Use Winamp lite only for listening to music.
Carmon Posted July 1, 2005 Posted July 1, 2005 WMP10 for me i dont have any problems with it and dusnt take foreva to load so ill say wmp10
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now