NotHereToPlayGames Posted Sunday at 08:18 PM Posted Sunday at 08:18 PM 1 minute ago, Saxon said: But I too think it's the old Chrome 109 (?) with the added new features to render some modern sites upon the old engine. Highly HIGHLY improbable. We either need to NAIL THIS COFFIN SHUT or we need to PROVE this CONSPIRACY once and for all. Let's all of us take a step back and come up with some sort of D#MN PROOF. Twitch PROVES NOTHING. Let's start thinking outside the box that we have all buried ourself in. I've already "seen enough" to see THIS IS MISINFORMATION !!! But the "west side story gang" is always always always going to stick together and "go down with the ship". 1
Dave-H Posted Sunday at 10:21 PM Posted Sunday at 10:21 PM 2 hours ago, Saxon said: As I stated above, the site rendering engine had to be left intact. It's what they do in other forks, only something that is missing is replaced, redirected. And Supermium already includes fixed DWrite.dll , so no reason to dig the sire rendering part. But I too think it's the old Chrome 109 (?) with the added new features to render some modern sites upon the old engine. So how do you explain the result at https://chromiumchecker.com/? That site would be pretty much discredited if it couldn't detect an old Chromium version masquerading as a newer one! 2
Saxon Posted Sunday at 10:25 PM Posted Sunday at 10:25 PM 10 hours ago, Dave-H said: So how do you explain the result at https://chromiumchecker.com/? That site would be pretty much discredited if it couldn't detect an old Chromium version masquerading as a newer one! Win32SS is a well known master of stubs/redirects. How else the Ex. Kernel works? I'm not saying he did it in this case, just to be clear. But that and/or similar sites are easy to fool with stubs. 4
Saxon Posted Sunday at 10:32 PM Posted Sunday at 10:32 PM (edited) 13 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: Highly HIGHLY improbable. We either need to NAIL THIS COFFIN SHUT or we need to PROVE this CONSPIRACY once and for all. Let's all of us take a step back and come up with some sort of D#MN PROOF. Twitch PROVES NOTHING. Let's start thinking outside the box that we have all buried ourself in. I've already "seen enough" to see THIS IS MISINFORMATION !!! But the "west side story gang" is always always always going to stick together and "go down with the ship". When someone writes too much in such manner, it's demagogy. The Supermium author already confessed it has nothing to do with DirectWrite. like you tried to insert/inject. "I developed a method to ensure that the "experimental" web feature support could be used only on specific sites, but I thought this would not be problem this early in 132 ESR's life. With that in mind, twitch.tv should be defaulted to use it, but other sites should be untouched, to avoid breaking other websites such as British Gas." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1279#issuecomment-2760133080 Why "experimental" web features are needed on the allegedly new engine, and as we saw with proof, Twitch works on Chrome 110 from 3 years ago, but you provide no proof. Edited Sunday at 10:34 PM by Saxon 4
Dave-H Posted Sunday at 10:49 PM Posted Sunday at 10:49 PM 23 minutes ago, Saxon said: Win32SS is a well known master of stubs/redirects. How else the Ex. Kernel works? I'm not saying he did it in this case, just to be clear. But that and/or similar sites are easy to fool with stubs. If that really is the case, then they are completely useless. 1
Klemper Posted Sunday at 10:51 PM Posted Sunday at 10:51 PM 13 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: But the "west side story gang" is always always always going to stick together and "go down with the ship". Excuse me, I'm not familiar with your shenanigans, whose ship do you mean? The developer's? Well, he reads the topic here, alright. As soon as I wrote the sandbox issue got closed, it almost immediately reverted to "open", but still no answer, either to the missiing sandbox, or Dave's question, for days now. 2
D.Draker Posted Monday at 04:13 AM Posted Monday at 04:13 AM On 3/23/2025 at 6:10 PM, NotHereToPlayGames said: Disabeled chromecast and the UDP ports that it opens. Apart from misspellings, this is simply not true, would I call it "misinformation"? At this point no, I *of course* probably should, but I'm not as harsh as you. Please provide your claim with the source, or ask your restless lemmings upvoters to do it for you. Thanks. 3
D.Draker Posted Monday at 04:35 AM Posted Monday at 04:35 AM Can someone check whether Twitch works on Chrome360 v.86? In contrast to @Klemper, I have no Twitch account, and I deleted v.86 seven years ago. 1
NotHereToPlayGames Posted Monday at 06:31 AM Posted Monday at 06:31 AM (edited) 2 hours ago, D.Draker said: Apart from misspellings, this is simply not true, would I call it "misinformation"? At this point no, I *of course* probably should, but I'm not as harsh as you. Please provide your claim with the source, or ask your restless lemmings upvoters to do it for you. Thanks. re: --test-type chrome flag https://github.com/GoogleChrome/chrome-launcher/issues/24 https://github.com/GoogleChrome/chrome-launcher/blob/main/docs/chrome-flags-for-tools.md I do not get the Chromecast UDP in *any* of my browsers! But I can confirm that I just *disabled* the --test-type flag but I still do *NOT* get the Chromecast UDP! Would require additional testing which time alludes me at the moment. Only tested in Official Ungoogled as of this morning. No time to test further. Edited Monday at 06:59 AM by NotHereToPlayGames
NotHereToPlayGames Posted Monday at 07:13 AM Posted Monday at 07:13 AM Disproving CONSPIRACIES is a DEATH TRAP. I'm done with the "conspiracy" of Supermium not being the engine it claims to be. H#LL, we're still trying to prove who killed JFK or whether we really landed on the moon or not. Some CONSPIRACIES will NEVER be proven - this one is NOT WORTH ANY MORE OF MY TIME. You guys are, of course, obligated/entitled to define how your time is allocated. 1
Skorpios Posted Monday at 07:37 AM Posted Monday at 07:37 AM 3 hours ago, D.Draker said: Can someone check whether Twitch works on Chrome360 v.86? In contrast to @Klemper, I have no Twitch account, and I deleted v.86 seven years ago. It's working but my doorstop is struggling... I don't have an account but can watch free videos. EE360 13.5.1030.0 Chrome 86.0.4240.198 Thinkpad A31 with XP Pro SP3 P4 1.6 GHz 1.25 MB DDR RAM Radeon 7500 16 MB RAM 2
D.Draker Posted Monday at 03:37 PM Posted Monday at 03:37 PM 19 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: re: --test-type chrome flag https://github.com/GoogleChrome/chrome-launcher/issues/24 https://github.com/GoogleChrome/chrome-launcher/blob/main/docs/chrome-flags-for-tools.md Member, you provided no source to backup your false claim regarding this. No cited article tells that flag disables UDP casting. Besides, it's NOT official, it's some dude over the internet, and even he never wrote what you falsely claimed. We already had a similar user which is now called "Guest". Let's focus on this. 3
D.Draker Posted Monday at 03:40 PM Posted Monday at 03:40 PM 18 hours ago, Skorpios said: It's working but my doorstop is struggling... I don't have an account but can watch free videos. EE360 13.5.1030.0 Chrome 86.0.4240.198 Thinkpad A31 with XP Pro SP3 P4 1.6 GHz 1.25 MB DDR RAM Radeon 7500 16 MB RAM Thank you very much for the testings! What happens if you just click on "log in"? Supermium gets an error, as they wrote. 3
Skorpios Posted Monday at 06:22 PM Posted Monday at 06:22 PM (edited) 4 hours ago, D.Draker said: Thank you very much for the testings! What happens if you just click on "log in"? Supermium gets an error, as they wrote. Clicking "Log In": nothing, no response at all, no error message Clicking "Sign Up": same as above Changing theme and language is working. Same thing with Incognito window. UPDATE Supermium 122, Thorium 122 AND even MP68... Edited Monday at 08:10 PM by Skorpios
Saxon Posted Monday at 07:10 PM Posted Monday at 07:10 PM On 3/29/2025 at 8:05 PM, Klemper said: No smoke without fire! The first suggestion in the searches, Supermium and the word virus after it, "Is not just a bug, (Supermium) causes overflow in Operating system. it crashed and YouTube request relog 2 times (be careful). I completely uninstalled it (Supermium)" No answer from the Developer for almost a week. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1281 https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/buffer-overflow "Modern buffer overflow attacks often incorporate advanced obfuscation techniques to bypass detection and exploit vulnerabilities in real-time systems. Types of buffer overflow attacks. Techniques to exploit buffer overflow vulnerabilities vary based on the operating system (OS) and programming language." https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/buffer-overflow 2
Recommended Posts