Jump to content

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Yep.  The more often you visit, the more often you prevent what you are trying to achieve.

As already answered, but gone: that is not true in the other test sites mentioned here. I have tested in them a number of times, always different results, with (in 1 case, 7 similar canvas hashes in a test site I hadn;t visited in a year or so). 

In any case, to test in those sites you need to allow javascript, redirections and what have you. Much like when signing into the e-oligopoly. That those sites can see some information when using their sites doesn't mean they can see said info in other sites' logs, sites where most of us wouldn't relax our set up to satisfy our curiosity.

Now, if Maxwell Smart is going after you, that's a different kind of song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 hours ago, dmiranda said:

I'm quite happy with it. They know I enter 5 times (I'd prefer they had seen 5 different browsers, but hey, I don't use a vpn -will try wih TOR), but they have 0% trust on their results.

Noname.png

 

With my (current) setup I get:

spacer.png

But I don't really know what that all means :blink: I presume green would be preferred.

Edited by XPerceniol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note that visits went from 5 to 11. I didn't visit with mypal68 since last time (my first five where all within minutes). I did try a number of times with sp52, differrerent browser, different profile, but it doesn't load there (but maybe the ip, which I hadn't changed, is registered.

@XPerceniol: I reckon your 38% means the probability that they have profiled you correctly. A 0% is that they have no confidence whatsoever.

Edited by dmiranda
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those willing to try Arkenfox, check  https://arkenfox.github.io/gui/  . Make sure to click "expand" on the top row, and use reading lenses. It displays options available for ff119, but most of them work in FF68. To make sure what the differences are, find and check (in arkenfox github's page) the user.js corresponding to ff68. Most of the tweaks in the later do work, in fact, in sp52 too.

Edited by dmiranda
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, dmiranda said:

These are the ones I play with. font.system.whitelist is the one I'm dealing with at the moment. Do not seem to do much, but what is found by different tests sites varies and, more importantly, the hash/fingerprint extracted from the fonts varies within tests, if repeated over time with a hardened set up.

user_pref("browser.display.use_document_fonts", 1); // default, 0 doesn't expose system fonts, 1 uses all or those set in font.system.whitelist (confirm)
user_pref("font.blacklist.underline_offset", ""); // set, original was "FangSong,Gulim,GulimChe,MingLiU,MingLiU-ExtB,MingLiU_HKSCS,MingLiU-HKSCS-ExtB,MS Gothic,MS Mincho,MS PGothic,MS PMincho,MS UI Gothic,PMingLiU,PMingLiU-ExtB,SimHei,SimSun,SimSun-ExtB,Hei,Kai,Apple LiGothic,Apple LiSung,Osaka"

user_pref("font.internaluseonly.changed", true); // not sure what this is, appears on settings when the font.system.whitelist is populated, I believe

user_pref("font.name.monospace.x-western", "FontAwesome"); // many pages, including msfn, use it for buttons and such. I download those fonts manually, and "install" them in system

user_pref("font.size.variable.x-western", 14);

user_pref("font.system.whitelist", "Arial, Batang, Cambria Math, Courier New, Gautami, Georgia, Lucida Console, MS Gothic, MS Mincho, MS PGothic, MS PMincho, MV Boli, Malgun Gothic, Mangal, Meiryo, Meiryo UI, Microsoft Himal\ aya, Microsoft JhengHei, Microsoft JengHei UI, Microsoft YaHei, Microsoft YaHei UI, MingLiU, Noto Sans Buginese, Noto Sans Khmer, Noto Sans Lao, Noto Sans Myanmar, Noto Sans Yi, Nyala, PMingLiU, Plantagenet Cherokee, Raavi, Segoe UI, Shruti, SimSun, Sylfaen, Tahoma, Times New Roman, Tunga, Verdana, Vrinda, Yu Gothic UI, Sans-Serif, FontAwesome"); // [HIDDEN PREF] *-* there a number of standard lists out there. I'll play with these for a while.

user_pref("gfx.downloadable_fonts.enabled", false); // set *-*

user_pref("gfx.downloadable_fonts.woff2.enabled", false); // set *-*

user_pref("gfx.font_rendering.graphite.enabled", false); // set

user_pref("gfx.font_rendering.opentype_svg.enabled", false); // set

user_pref("layout.css.font-loading-api.enabled", false); // set *-* these 5 css.font  entries prevent coveryourtracks tests from completing.

user_pref("layout.css.font-visibility.level", 1); // set *-* 1 system fonts, 2 is 1+user fonts, 3 is whatever is there

user_pref("layout.css.font-visibility.resistFingerprinting", 1); // set *-*

user_pref("layout.css.font-visibility.standard", 1); // set *-*

user_pref("layout.css.font-visibility.trackingprotection", 1); // set *-*

user_pref("svg.disabled", false); // default, otherwise it breaks FB, probably linkedin and YT buttons
 

So I added this to my user.js and its makes things pretty ugly so I'll revert back to my previous setup ... but thank you for your attention @dmiranda ... hehe good thing I know where they buttons are and my memory serves me well as I needed to edit.

spacer.png

spacer.png

Edited by XPerceniol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For MSFN, as in the comments, you need to download FontAwesome 4.7 and install it (drop it, really) into cindows/fonts. see https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1256779

1 hour ago, XPerceniol said:

user_pref("font.name.monospace.x-western", "FontAwesome"); // many pages, including msfn, use it for buttons and such. I download those fonts manually, and "install" them in systemuser_pref("font.size.variable.x-western", 14);

As per other pages (if you don't care toidentify and download the font, you can relax the no donwload fonts rules

user_pref("gfx.downloadable_fonts.enabled", false); // set *-*  -change back to true

user_pref("gfx.downloadable_fonts.woff2.enabled", false); // set *-*    -change back to true

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks again @dmiranda and don't feel compelled to reply on New Years Eve - I know you're busy - whenever you get around to it is just fine :)

All good with FontAwesome 4.7 and I DID run through your user.js and did decide for other sites to take your advice and set to true. So I'm allowing downloadable fonts, then,

user_pref("gfx.downloadable_fonts.enabled", false); // set *-*  -change back to true

user_pref("gfx.downloadable_fonts.woff2.enabled", false); // set *-*    -change back to true

<OT>

I did a little worse surprisingly on that test given to use by the great @Sampei.Nihira (we appreciate you here my good man) and as you can see, that test site thinks I only visited the site 1 time with NM28 when of course that would be 3 times including Mypal68 as I'm now posting from NM28 and that is what the picture depicts.

spacer.png

<OT>

PS: Same IP

Edited by XPerceniol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, XPerceniol said:

did a little worse surprisingly on that test given to use by the great @Sampei.Nihira (we appreciate you here my good man) and as you can see, that test site thinks I only visited the site 1 time with NM28 when of course that would be 3 times including Mypal68 as I'm now posting from NM28 and that is what the picture depicts.

I was surprised and happy to get a 0%, repeatedly, even though my IP was constant. Surprising it runs in NM28. I can;t run it in sp52. But that may be a function of the many tweaks in the profile (pointless to run these kinds of tests in a fresh profile). Interesting it did not recognize you by your IP, though. I take all these tests with a grain of salt, lemon and shot of tequila, anyway. To run them, I have to give them access I don't give any webpage, except my accounts in the e-oligopoly. I suspect they are giving me leeway to feel safe and go visit ok-ru more often, to learn my tastes and send my way their smartest bots to figure out my deepest desires and confess all me crimes, matey. Obviously they don't know the effects that poor distilled rum, and other stuff,  can have on memory.

Edited by dmiranda
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having a PayPal issue that might be related to my MyPal 68.13.0 browser. I used to make PayPal payments on various websites without any issue. But within the past few weeks, I get the following error message after I login and it shifts to my PayPal wallet:

Things don't appear to be working at the moment.
Try Again

The dumb thing is my MyPal 68.13.0 browser is working fine otherwise. And my PayPal account is also working. I can still make PayPal payments on websites if I switch over to my older MyPal 29.2.0 browser. But it's a pain having to switch back and forth between browsers.

Any suggestions? I haven't made any adjustments to my MyPal 68.13.0 browser that I'm aware of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...