29 minutes ago, Anbima said:

It doesn't work for me.
I have entered the PAC script.
Should the tick be green? I can't confirm anything.
What am I doing wrong?

 

... For me it must be "*.example.com". Then it works.

No. What about that here:

53 minutes ago, Anbima said:

It doesn't work for me.

For me. it works as it should.

53 minutes ago, Anbima said:

Should the tick be green? I can't confirm anything.

No. No green. Just insert the PAC script code! You won't get any confirmation messages.

53 minutes ago, Anbima said:

What am I doing wrong?

I really don't know what you are doing. All a bit strange.

53 minutes ago, Anbima said:

.. For me it must be "*.example.com". Then it works.

"example.com" is completely sufficient and exactly corresponds to the URL which you wanted to load.

Edited May 21, 20242 yr by AstroSkipper
Correction

9 minutes ago, AstroSkipper said:

exactly corresponds to the URL which you wanted to load

I actually think what he's trying to do is for
   one.example.com
   two.example.com
   three.example.com
   www.example.com

and what you are proposing will only work for
   example.com

10 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

I actually think what he's trying to do is for
   one.example.com
   two.example.com
   three.example.com
   www.example.com

and what you are proposing will only work for
   example.com

@Anbima didn't say anything about that. If one doesn't make clear announcements, one can't expect to get exactly the information one needs. We are not clairvoyants.  If the PAC script contains a different URL than the one you want to call up, you don't have to be surprised that it doesn't work.

18 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

one.example.com
   two.example.com
   three.example.com
   www.example.com

and what you are proposing will only work for
   example.com

Yes, that is the problem.
With "*." all third-level domains are recorded.
Can several different domains be entered in the IF query, or do I have to make a separate query for each domain?

16 minutes ago, Anbima said:

Can several different domains be entered in the IF query, or do I have to make a separate query for each domain?

I had to create for each domain a separate, new IF query otherwise it wouldn't have worked in my installation.

Edited May 21, 20242 yr by AstroSkipper
Update of content

You can shorten it a little:
if (shExpMatch(host, "*.example.com")|shExpMatch(host, "*.google.*")|shExpMatch(host, "*.wetter.com")) {

But it is very confusing.

However, I have noticed that it sometimes causes problems if the website integrates external content that does not have SSL.
In this case, the external website must also be recorded.
I'm thinking about running all pages via the proxy after all :-)

However, the following sentence from the developer unsettles me:
Be aware and careful! Use a direct connection when you don't want any mistakes made.

Is the proxy not secure, or what does this mean?

22 minutes ago, Anbima said:

However, the following sentence from the developer unsettles me:

Which developer do you mean? Please, be a bit more precise! If you mean the extension developer, I assume he warns the user not to misconfigure the Proxy Switcher extension and not to use unsecure web proxies.

22 minutes ago, Anbima said:

Is the proxy not secure, or what does this mean?

Which proxy do you mean? If you mean ProxHTTPSProxy, this local proxy is as secure as Windows XP and direct connection is.

Edited May 21, 20242 yr by AstroSkipper

That should be the developer, right?
https://github.com/wheever/ProxHTTPSProxyMII

Do you always use the proxy, or only occasionally?
Do you trust it?

15 hours ago, Anbima said:

That should be the developer, right?
https://github.com/wheever/ProxHTTPSProxyMII
Do you trust it?

All @heinoganda's, @Thomas S.'s, @cmalex's proxy versions and also my packages of ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu are based on whenever's ProxHTTPSProxyMII. All of them can be considered secure, of course. Or do you think I would offer here unsecure proxy packages?  And first of all, credits to the original developer whenever.

Edited May 22, 20242 yr by AstroSkipper
Update of content

5 hours ago, Anbima said:

Do you always use the proxy, or only occasionally?

There is no need to use ProxHTTPSProxy for all internet connections, even in Windows XP. Mypal 68, 360Chrome, Thorium, Supermium and all @roytam1's browser editions are capable of the TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols. However, the proxy is actually only needed for those programmes which are not capable of these protocols but need them in these days. Same applies to WU/MU, for example. Therefore, I use ProxHTTPSProxy only occasionally when really needed. And such cases happen, of course. Which sites do you need this proxy in 360Chrome for? Which sites appear to be unsafe for you in 360Chrme? 

Edited May 22, 20242 yr by AstroSkipper
Update of content

There are more and more sites for which 360Chrome does not support the protocols.
You have to register on the following page.
And this data would then be transmitted unprotected.
https://teccat.carparts-cat.com/

Or is there another solution?

Personally, I would now just use Thorium or Supermium to access such sites on XP if security there was an issue for me.

 

50 minutes ago, Anbima said:

There are more and more sites for which 360Chrome does not support the protocols.

The only example you gave is a website where the user has to register. You said: "...more and more sites...". So please list here examples of websites which appear unsecure in 360Chrome and do not need any registering! Thanks 

50 minutes ago, Dave-H said:

Personally, I would now just use Thorium or Supermium to access such sites on XP if security there was an issue for me.

I have tested Supermium and it needs so much memory, which is not available.
Does Thorium need less memory?

20 minutes ago, AstroSkipper said:

The only example you gave is a website where the user has to register. You said: "...more and more sites...". So please list here examples of websites which appear unsecure in 360Chrome and do not need any registering! Thanks 

For pages that I only want to view, it doesn't matter whether they are encrypted or not.
I only have concerns when I have to log in or enter data, as is the case with the example mentioned.

With https://www.deepl.com/translator for example, I don't care whether it is encrypted or not.