Tripredacus

Topic merged.

Yet the GPIO driver caused the most recent crash in the dumps you provided.

A crash caused by a breakpoint can typically only be handled by the developer of the code that included the breakpoint. In general, it is a bad idea to release public code with a breakpoint in it without offering support for it. Now, the file that windbg complains about is the amdgpio2.sys. If this is an unmodified file from AMD, then I would say that this particular version should not be present. Or you can just not install the driver that put that in the system. In other words, you can't do anything if a breakpoint is what crashed the system, especially from binaries with no public symbols.

Especially if any of those SHA-1 signed updates are required to install SHA-2 support on a system. They wouldn't break that update chain would they?

-07 hit a breakpoint. Are you using beta or custom drivers?

Removed link to the APK.

It is a Panduit dp5e, just as in the op. After further research, this model number is just the frame and not for the modules. The one I posted a picture of is the DP5E with Cat6 MiniJack modules installed. You can get this model with punchdown modules or other types.

They should be tied to the profile. Are you logging into a domain, to MS or local? Are you using a cached or temporary profile?

backside picture for reference:

Scrolling on inactive windows is not really an OS feature. You can certainly do it in Windows 7, but I believe it has more to do with how the program is written than what OS it is running on. Maybe Win10 has something that overrides a program's default interaction, making it possible to do an inactive scroll even if it isn't supported? Regarding extra devices... when dealing with computers not in production or corporate environments... I just don't install drivers for stuff I don't use. IME and SoL are ... SOL.

I took a look at a few and they do not use a power supply. It is basically just a metal frame with RJ-45 couplers in it. The backside of the panel is where you connect the lines that connect to your individual wall outlets or what-have-you. Now since there is no shared connection in the panel itself, in order to use it to create a network, you need to use the front ports to connect into something. So on the ones I looked at, the fronts are all connected using short cables to a switch. That switch then connects to "the internet" (there's a bunch of stuff in-between the switch and the internet) Troubleshooting a link can be tricky. I recommend that you use the labels on the panel to match the labels on your ports. So you can easily look at the wall and know which port to look at on the panel. Depending on the complexity of your network, you have these segments: - between PC and wall outlet - between wall outlet and back of the panel (cable goes through wall) - between front of panel to other device (switch) - etc In the three segment arrangement, you can test each easily. I use an old router or some device with a link light and just check each end. Easiest to have to swap out a cable that is not in the wall for obvious reasons. I think over the past 9 years I've had to replace a few patch cables and a couple cables between computer and the wall. Not that the cables necessarily went bad, but maybe they fell out of tolerance. Obviously, your arrangement will vary from the example above. There is no right or wrong way to use a patch panel, and you can even use them without running cables through walls if you wanted to.

Boot the system using a WinPE, live cd or view the disk in another OS. Verify if the file it complains about is actually missing. If the file is actually missing, replace it and then try to boot the disk again. There are situations where a program (or OS) may complain about a file being missing when it is not actually missing. This can happen if the program or OS only knows the location of the required file by way of another file, such as an .ini, .xml, registry entry or environment variable. If that intermediary is missing, changed or corrupted such as to be pointing to the wrong place, then an error like this is possible. There are also situations where an intermediary points to a file, and the file isn't present, but the intermediary isn't active and the file is not supposed to be present. An example of this I've seen is bitlocker when scanning files for encryption will read the reagent.xml file and attempt to follow the paths inside to any files that are present. This fails on systems with WinRE disabled, since the files in the XML are not present and the reagent.xml is not used by anything. So this type of example shows a false positive to a file missing error. Hopefully it will just be a situation where the file it is complaining about is actually missing.

OK, so for a production scenario, the program should be tested in that environment. Not on a VM with 5 disks attached to it. Also the scope defined by op: Does not specifically state what combinations of disks may be present. If the VM example showing 6 disks is because there may be computers with a various amount of disks, not only do you have to find the supported disk sizes but also which Disk # that disk is. So if there is a system with a 120 GB, 200 GB and a 1 TB, you'd need to know which disk # matches to which disk. Is there a possibility of a system with 2 or more of the same disk sizes present? Is there the possibility that a system with a 200 GB and 1 TB disk has the 1 TB disk appear as Disk 0 and the 200 GB is disk 1? Is there the possibility that a system has a card reader that is detected by WinPE as disk 0 and the HDDs as Disk 1 and 2, or the card reader is Disk 1 and the HDDs are Disk 0 and 2? Because in the example code, this is using absolute disk numbering. It is taking for granted that the disk numbers and disk sizes attached to those numbers are expected and makes no consideration for the possibility they are not.

Is it possible that the tool with the lower value is being limited? Perhaps by session, such as only being able to see session >0 ?

Verify disk numbers. The 120 GB and 200 GB disks aren't likely to have the same disk number. In both script, you are using Disk 1.

Asus X509FB-EJ090T For nvidia drivers, know they have set OS version limitations in them, but did not change the text for requirements on their website. You may need to find an older version for your video controller rather than just use the newest on nvidia's website. Asus site only shows Win10 for this model. Need HwIDs for the intel, nvidia graphics. HwID for the touchpad will say who the manufacturer is, Synaptics or Elantec. Be aware that both those companies write drivers using a compat ID, meaning their software can install to the wrong hardware. For card reader, if it is Realtek there are usually only 2 models. I'm fairly certain they don't really have an OS version on their drivers, the drivers for Win7 work in Win10. They are either DEV_5229 or DEV_5289.

What is the model of the notebook?

Maybe it is because he has two accounts? This seems like his original account: https://medium.com/@therealdvorak Or maybe the message is a false error on Medium, such as it isn't redirecting because he changed his name. Or made a new account and had the old one deleted. Twitch used to have a similar problem where if you tried to view a channel that didn't exist (whether the account had ever existed or had not) it would show the same message of "you need a time machine to see this page." Interestingly enough, there is a google search suggestion for Dvorak banned from medium, but if I choose that then nothing relevant is in the results. @submix8c, you're not on twitter anymore? Maybe you can ask him. Eh I see you haven't tweeted in 4 years.

In the future, ask (or wait) for the topic to be moved to the correct section before creating a duplicate thread.

2020 04 (April) And it is a good idea, since they originally were going to release in March. Since Server SKUs get the same build number, it would have resulted in a Server 2019 2003, which would be a disaster to search for since all you'd find would be stuff regarding Server 2003.

The jury is out on whether we can even do anything to stop or change the path of the climate, however it is more important that we can agree that pollution of any sort is bad and we can always do more to cut down on that and make our environment better for each other. E-waste is primarily caused by many things, of which I can think, but these may be limited to the US. - manufacturers creating products with planned obsolescene and/or not following standards, resulting in short lifespans. - manufacturers using designs that are not publicly documented, or keep documentation behind paywalls or subscription plans. - manufacturers that replace whole parts (such as boards) instead of fixing or replacing individual components. - manufacturers that sue repair shops - trades (in general) not seen as important and not taught in schools, especially electronics Going back to the 1990s, there were repair shops all over the place. You could take you electronic gadget to get fixed and it was an actual fix and not just a PCB replacement. Or you could get the service manual and do the work yourself. Even to this day, if you buy some older electronic device, you can find the service manual online and be able to do a repair yourself. With new products, that isn't an option. As things changed, the removal of electronic repair shops, the disappearing of stores to buy components (although most can be found online), the ceasing of schools teaching trades like electronics/repair and likely the fact that costs have come way down on products has made it so people do not have the same attachment to something they once had. It is cheaper to just "buy a new one" instead of trying to find someone to repair it. Companies do replace products if they are under warranty, but they are doing wholesale changes and does not solve the e-waste issue. It is cheaper for a company to just replace a PCB and sell the "bad" one to a recycler than to spend time to diagnose and repair a problem. So in the current day, there is too few options for what to do with broken or unwanted electronics. Pay a recycler to take the thing? Put it out into the garbage? Throw it into the woods or the ocean? We had a ton of electronics years ago and didn't have this waste problem because the products lasted longer and they could be fixed. And fixing something was cheaper than buying a replacement, or cheap enough to make waiting for a repair a better option than buying a new one.

What Channel is that for? I haven't heard anything about a new ISO. Is there a version numbering difference?

I'm having listserv flashbacks!

IMO the easiest way to do this would be to build a custom WinPE. Not sure if it would need any packages. Then in sources you put your two .wim files. And use the startnet.cmd to be where you put your menu with the two options. Each would just call setup.exe /unattend:file.xml and each .xml would specify the .wim location and index. You can use Choice to make the menu.

Sergiaws, might I recommend that when you create topics, make a mention of your vision situation. Since you do not have a lot of posts here, many members may not be aware of this and would hopefully save others from suggesting things us "seeing" people take for granted that may not be helpful to you.