Dave-H

Yes it is. Almost every time I run it it updates to a new version, when I checked just now it updated from 13.4.21 to 14.4.19. It's still apparently working fine though, the only thing I have to do when it updates is to disable the DbxSvc (DbxSvc.exe) service, which is not compatible with XP, but this does not seem to affect functionality in any way, and I only disable it to avoid the error messages about it in the event log.

It was pretty slow on both my XP installations, but not that bad!

If you load the Windows/Microsoft Update page in IE8, on the left is a "Review your update history" link to view the installed updates. They're also recorded in the Windows Event Viewer System log, although there is more than one entry for each one there. From heinoganda's list, for me KB3192321 was already installed earlier, and KB3197835 was not installed as I don't have IIS running. That leaves seven, plus three for Office.

Yes I got mine eventually, ten updates in my case (three for Office). Both my XP machines took a huge amount of time scanning for updates, much longer than they normally do, but all installed OK eventually.

No sign of any yellow shield here yet. I got my Windows 8.1 updates yesterday, and my partner's Windows 7 laptop has got them today. I'll wait a while longer and see what happens.

You'll have a job if there is, as everything seems to be rolled up into one big single update now!

Sadly it looks as if using that option on QuickMirror will not solve the problem. With it or any of its variants set, it checks every file really slowly every time I run the mirror, even though the log says it hasn't changed any of them! This is taking nearly as long as actually copying them would, and it's doing it every single time too, not just twice a year! I can only assume this is because it's checking the content of all the files every time, which is always going to be really slow. Unless there is any other workaround, I guess I'm just going to have to accept that it will have to do a full copy twice a year after the clocks change.

Thanks again, I'll change the QuickMirror settings and hopefully I then won't have to re-copy the entire contents of my archive drive twice a year! I just needed reassurance that changing that setting wouldn't have any obvious other disadvantages. Windows Offline Files is there in Windows XP (but only the Professional version I think, not the Home version). It's a way of keeping selected files on one computer synchronised with files on another computer, mainly useful to synchronise files between a portable computer and a fixed desktop, at least that what I use it for! It means I can have a lot of my archive files with me when I go away with my netbook, and I just re-sync before I go away to make sure it's up to date with what's on the desktop. I very rarely if ever make changes to the files on the netbook while I'm away, but if I did those changes should carry back over to the versions on the desktop the next time I sync. Unfortunately it obviously gets thrown when the clocks change as one of the drives it's synchronising is a FAT32 drive and the other is NTFS. It wouldn't be an issue except that it takes so long to re-synchronise everything, even with the two computers directly connected together with an Ethernet cable!

Thanks jaclaz! My backup software is QuickMirror, and I've now done what I should have done in the first place and checked its settings! Do you think the option I have highlighted here will fix the problem, and will it cause any others?! It has always been set to the "date, time and size" default before, which has caused the issue of course! This may well fix the backup problem, but I can't see any way of doing something similar with Windows Offline Files. I've just finished re-synchronising the XP side of my netbook with the XP side of my main computer, and it took about ten hours as every file had to be replaced!

Not sure where to put this as it isn't really OS specific, but I mainly use XP so that's why it's here! We changed from UTC+1 to UTC last weekend here in the UK, and a recurring annoying problem which I always forget about cropped up. I back up my system archive very regularly, and the source drive is FAT32 as I want to use it natively with Windows 98SE. The destination backup drive is NTFS, as it has to be able to cope with files larger than 4GB, such as system image backups. Of course every time the clocks change every single file has to be re-copied across because their time stamps have changed, which takes ages and is a real PITA. I know why this happens, it's because FAT32 and NTFS handle timestamps differently, but is there any way around this? Also I synchronise some of the archive to my netbook, which is all NTFS drives, using the Windows Offline Files system. The same thing happens here, every file has to be copied, including unchanged ones that are several gigabytes, and it takes hours and hours! Is there really no answer to this other than converting my archive drive to NTFS or just putting up with it twice a year?!

There is a version 14 package, which included updates for all the dlls but didn't include any installation files, and a version 15, which just updated kexbases.dll. I think that the version 11 package was the last to include any installation files.

Glad you found BlueScreenView useful, Nirsoft's programs are always good, I've got several of them and I'm always amazed that they're free! AFAIK it doesn't collect any personal information.

Understood, thanks!

Doesn't clearing the tick on "Automatically restart" in the Startup and Recovery section of the Advanced System Properties tab do that, or is this something different?

Well it may well be that Avast was the culprit, only time will tell. The minidump files should be in C:\WINNT\Minidump if your system paths are standard. The names include the dates they were generated. Their contents won't tell you anything without the debugger.

Amen!

Do the BSODs say what caused them? Very often (but not always) they say which file (usually a driver) caused the crash. Nirsoft's BlueScreenView will allow you to examine the BSODs and it often tells you what the faulting module was even if the initial blue screen didn't. For even more information, install the Windows Debugger and that will extract information from the minidump file that should have been created, tell you exactly what modules were involved, and suggest a cause. It's a bit hard to find a standalone version of that as it's part of the Windows SDK, but if you PM me I can help.

All seems OK here too, touch wood!

Well I finally got it working! It appears that it didn't like the custom path I was using for the installation. It worked fine if I installed into the default path, and indeed it seemed every other path I tried, except the one I usually use! I think it was something to do with the fact that I'd moved the cache into there, and it finally came good when I manually deleted all the user files relating to it, losing all my settings, and started completely from scratch. It does seem to be fussier about the install location now, although it does still allow you to change it, like the fact that it won't now install into a folder that's not empty, as I mentioned before, which it always used to with no problem. All seems OK now though thanks, I just hope I won't have to go through this every time I update, it used to be really straightforward!

Does this new version of Java work OK for anyone else on XP? It doesn't seem to for me. It installs fine, the only difference I noticed is that it now won't install into a folder that's not empty, which it would before if you specified a non-default folder, but it won't work for me in any browser. I just get "detecting Java" on the Oracle test pages and that's it, it never seems to go any further, and I've tried a few other test pages and it ends up locking up the browser. Anyone actually got it working?

I must say that I agree with that to some extent. There is an argument that MS should get as much telemetry back as possible from XP systems so they know that there are loads of them still in use out there. Every time I have an application freeze or crash, or a system BSOD crash, I always make a point of sending the information to MS on principle for that very reason! The downside of that of course is that drawing attention to the fact that a lot of people are still using XP systems might encourage MS to start deliberately blocking things like the WES09 and POSReady 2009 updates. Frankly I don't think that's likely though. @niko32 Looking at my MRT log, there is no record of any telemetry being sent by MRT.exe until August 10th 2016, when the final XP compatible version was served by Windows Update, and my log goes back to 2005.

Surely as MSRT 5.39.12900 is the last one issued for XP, this shouldn't be a concern unless you run it manually. It already ran once when it was first downloaded, so if it does do anything naughty, the damage is already done! It's not going to ever run by itself.........................is it?

Hmm, yes I think I'm onto a loser here I'm afraid! Thanks for the suggestion Stephen but I've decided to uninstall Google Chrome Frame. I think the chances of it restoring full functionality to IE8 are pretty poor now, and having two installations of Chrome on my machine has caused other complications, like their determination to share the same profile! It's not the end of the world if some sites don't work in IE8 any more as there are still plenty of alternatives of course. I would like to fix the Windows Help and Support Center window malfunctioning more, but as I guess it's also IE8 in a different skin that's not going to now be easy or maybe even possible either. It is strange that pages that actually still work in IE8 will not now open in the Help and Support Center. I will have to do some more investigation on that! Thanks again, these things are always worth trying, if only for fun! Cheers, Dave.

Thanks Stephen, I must say I had never heard of Google Chrome Frame! I'm giving it a try, and it seems to have installed OK, but doesn't seem to work. To work automatically it seems to need a header code put into the website, and I bet you won't find many that now have it as the system has been abandoned for two years. Microsoft would certainly have never included it on any of their pages! You're supposed to be able to force its use if the code is not there by putting "cf:" (without the quotes) in front of the URL, but I can't get that to work either. It either immediately says it can't display the page ("Most likely cause: Some content or files on this webpage require a program that you don't have installed"), or it sits forever with "connecting" on the tab with a progress circle rotating. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? Google Chrome Frame seems to install a complete (rather old) installation of Google Chrome. I already have the last XP version of Google Chrome (49) installed, in a different folder obviously. Could they be clashing? Thanks, Dave.

Switching off styling brings back a garbled display, so I'm sure you're right, the CSS isn't working. Well this doesn't look too promising!