Dave-H

Off topic again, but there's no sign of the new Edge here today, it wasn't included in the Patch Tuesday updates as I thought it might be. It's probably updated using the normal app update mechanism though, so there's still time, although it didn't appear on a manual update check on the Microsoft Store.

Two updates this month, KB4484243 and KB4484236. Several minutes of scanning on Microsoft Update again, but it found them eventually. No problems with either of them. Strangely, the second update only updates a file called "graph.exe", which doesn't seem to exist on my system!

OK, so what did he mean by "I'm positive that Chrome 360 is based on a newer version of Chromium solely on the fact that it is the only XP browser that can load the new YouTube desing (sic)." I assume the last word should have been "design"!

Well, I look forward to Patch Tuesday then, can't wait to see if the new Edge looks any different. I don't use it on Windows 10 anyway, I use Firefox.

So Extreme Explorer 360 is the only XP browser that displays the new YouTube GUI on older hardware, and that's what @Windows 2000 meant?

What new design is that? YouTube looks exactly the same to me on Firefox 52 ESR on Windows XP as it does on Firefox 72 on Windows 10. Should I be seeing something different on Windows 10?

It doesn't look very old to me, the fact that it (presumably) has a touch screen rather than hardware buttons would bear that out.

No problem, I'm sure that the mods will see that there's actually no problem with the post you accidentally reported. Hopefully they will read this as well and realize what happened!

Off-topic, but is the Chromium version of Edge actually deployed in the latest version of Windows 10 (1909)? If so, I haven't seen any difference, so I guess the UI is exactly the same as before.

No problem I've found it now! Still seems to be perfectly OK here, both videos play fine, and it looks exactly the same as all other channels.

Sorry, I can't find that Instagram account to check it. Just to confirm, is it called "alexii__._ dance"? The formatting looks a bit odd.

Not seeing that here, everything seems to be working normally.

I had to do exactly that as the offline files sync suddenly stopped working between my main machine when running Windows 10 and my Netbook when running XP. Re-enabling SMB 1 on the Windows 10 installation sorted it out straight away. I hope MS don't eventually permanently disable it.

Yes, seems to be fine now here too! Thanks.

Thanks, glad I'm not the only one!

I'm now getting a nag banner popping up on MSFN all the time, on Firefox 52.9ESR/Windows XP and Firefox 71/Windows 10 asking me to switch off my ad blocker on the site and/or register and donate. As I already have my ad blocker (AdBlock+) disabled on MSFN, and I am a "Platinum Sponsor", I'm a bit puzzled by this! I think it started when the New Year started, does something on MSFN need to be updated?

Thanks for that, yes confirmed working fine here now on a system that it wasn't working on before, so I guess the problem was pointed out to their webmasters and was fixed!

Happy New Year to you too! Surely you would be better off asking this in the Windows 7 forum? There's already one thread at least.

@Goodmaneuver's suggestion looks fine to me!

@dencorso This discussion is now way off the original topic. The thread title really should be changed at least, which AFAIK can still be done by the OP editing the first post.

LOL, pedantic as always!

You're not called "The Finder" for nothing Jaclaz! I'm really amazed that the forum hasn't had the Christmas logo since 2015. Shows just how unobservant I am!

D-oh! Yes of course! The only lines I actually have ">nul" at the end of are - MODE CON CODEPAGE PREPARE=((850) C:\WIN-98\COMMAND\EGA.CPI) >nul MODE CON CODEPAGE SELECT=850 >nul IIRC that's to stop them printing the output to the screen, but of course they are still active.

Oh right, thanks Jaclaz. I've always used the ">nul" trick which I read about donkey's years ago. I always assumed that putting anything at the beginning of the line would possibly actually disable it, like putting "REM" or ";". I'll give that a try as it would look a bit more elegant. What's actually the downside of redirecting to NUL, does it waste memory or something?