LLXX

I think you should be asking yourself why you want to do this before you ask how.

Done via HTML injection. Common exploit for forums.

1.5MB/s? That's 12 megabit, and you say you're paying for 2.5mbps so I don't see any problem there!

Audacity can do that and a lot more, it's a general-purpose audio editor.

http://hddguru.com/content/en/software/ Free low-level diagnostics and recovery software.

'crack'...? Isn't it free? After looking through some information about it, it seems to be entirely web-based. It's probably just detecting it via some Javascript or the User-agent and refusing to continue, much like hotmail.com seems to not want Javascript disabled. These can easily be gotten around with a few Proxomitron filters. My user-agent currently says: User-Agent: Telnet (compatible; PN-DOS v8.94; MGnX v5.11) If you could provide a few links to the pages which are suppposedly not compatible, I can find where the check is and write the filter to kill it.

But it consumes a rather large amount of resources, moar than previous versions. BTW I think Acrobat 6.xx and newer are too bloated - I prefer 5.x or even 4.x.

WTF, that looks nothing like Vista -or- 98

Get out of here if you don't use Win95/98/ME OS.

If there's no page file then why does it show 276MB under "PF usage"?

Either they reorganised the topic #s or a digit was deleted during posting.

Then do it that way. Many sites specifically tell you to do that instead of just clicking on the link.

Don't forget that these licensing restrictions are mostly going to affect businesses etc. because they mostly need to use fully-legal software (in the US, as I understand it - here, piracy is quite the norm). As for personal uses at home... I doubt M$ isn't going to even try to see if every user's copy is legit, seeing as they withdrew WGA for XP I never really pay attention to software licenses and such, it's my hardware and I do whatever I want with it. M$'s software is just taking space on my hard drive, perhaps I should charge them rent...

Only your brain and experience, at the moment.... Entry point looks like this: call xxxxxxxx add eax xxxxxxxx jmp eax...and is repeated twice.

though you need to be using version 5.50.4948.700 of BROWSEUI.DLL instead of 5.50.4807.2300 to have the latest security benefits for the BROWSEUI.DLL file, LLXX. I no longer use 5.50.4807.2300 of BROWSEUI.DLL file because it has security flaws that are fixed in version 5.50.4948.700. I'll see if I can test out the BROWSE98.EXE patch on my WinME + IE6 SP1 machine, MDGx. eidenk, you need to be using IE6 SP1, NOT IE 5.5 SP2, in order for the BROWSE98.EXE patch to work. If you can clearly show what those 'security benefits' are, I might move to the newer version. Otherwise I'll leave things alone. Remember, I haven't been infected with *any* malware since I installed this 98SE over 6 years ago.

The 'proper' (or, according to English syntax) noun should be "UPX'er". Files packed with UPX should be referred to as "UPX'd". Here: for %a in (*.dll *.exe) do upx %aThat'll UPX all the files in the directory. Of course, you should do this from a DOS boot or alternate Windows install, as it can't compress live files like the kernel and shell. Basically, whether or not you see a speed improvement (or degradation) depends on the ratio of CPU speed to I/O speed. Compressed files will load faster if the I/O from the hard drive is taking the bulk of the time, whereas they'll load slower if the HDD is fast and the only overhead is the decompression. Compressed DLLs cannot be shared between processes, so memory usage increases linearly with the number of running processes using that DLL.

You will always be able to recover the files if the hard drive is in working condition physically and logically. Just connect it to another machine as a secondary (slave) drive and copy anything you want from it.

A user posted a similar situation awhile ago. Likely, WGA is dead for good. Micro$oft was probably getting annoyed at the mass traffic they were getting on their verification servers - all machines that had it installed would connect to the M$ server to check if the machine is running a genuine Windows XP installation. However many million machines running XP with WGA constantly pounding at their servers was a little too much for them to handle...

Instead of Windows XP Pro 64-bit you recieved Vista? You probably got scammed. You can get a newer and better Vista here, free: http://download.windowsvista.com/preview/rc1/en/download.htm

Attach mud to mail... that's what happens when the deliverer drops the mail into a puddle I just tried accessing the mud.mail.yahoo.com domain, it returns error of unknown hostname

I think you should've checked the name first... it looked familiar when I first saw it, and in a bad kind of way.

For some reason I keep thinking Google makes this, probably because of the name...

Fixed.I don't understand why users seem so intent on loading all these anti* programs to 'protect' them, when in fact all they needed to do was disable all the unneeded services and secure IE. A periodic virus scan would be nice, but if you're careful you shouldn't be infected in the first place.

BTW, here's RC1 for comparison purposes: Instructional page: http://download.windowsvista.com/preview/rc1/en/download.htm Direct download (32-bits): http://download.windowsvista.com/preview/rc1/en/x86/iso/vista_5600.16384.060829-2230_x86fre_client-lr1cfre_en_dvd.iso Direct download (64-bits): http://download.windowsvista.com/preview/rc1/en/x64/iso/vista_5600.16384.060829-2230_x64fre_client-lr1cxfre_en_dvd.iso

http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/117/int...gulator2en9.jpg Mine are similar, though the heatsinks are smaller than that. Even if they didn't have a heatsink, the heat gets conducted away by the large amounts of solder and metal on the mobo itself, and don't forget the CPU fan airflow blows past that area with the voltage regulators as well. In contrast, the ATX connector is usually in a very cramped portion of the mobo and doesn't recieve much ventilation.